<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dallas Cowboys Times &#187; Film Study/Stat Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/film-studystats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com</link>
	<description>Unrivaled Dallas Cowboys Info 24/7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should the Cowboys Make a Run at G Carl Nicks?</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl Nicks will be the top free agent guard on the market this offseason.  Should Dallas jump on him?


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think'>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</a> <small>Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats'>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</a> <small>Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In the past week or so, I have written extensively on the Cowboys' offensive line.  In my last post (a look at some <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/">interesting offensive statistics</a></strong> from 2011), I hit you with these numbers:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn’t start in 2012, although he probably will.</strong></li>
</ul>
It is pretty clear the interior line is in disarray in Dallas, and something needs to be done to fix it.  I suggested <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-where-should-doug-free-play/">moving Doug Free to right guard</a></strong> and drafting a right tackle in the first round (with Tyron Smith obviously kicking to the left side).  There are some pros and cons to that plan, but I like it because it instantly upgrades two spots.

Others have suggested the Cowboys might make a run at impending <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4689477/could-cowboys-make-play-for-carl-nicks?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">free agent guard Carl Nicks</a>, though.  Although Jerry Jones has refrained from signing big-money free agents since Jason Garrett has taken over as head coach, this is one I actually believe the 'Boys should jump all over.  Here's why.

Nicks will command a hefty contract, but guards are continually underpaid in the NFL.  He won't garner nearly as much money as an elite left tackle, but his impact (for Dallas, especially) isn't that much less than his tackle counterpart.  We saw how much a weak interior line can affect an offense in 2011.  Don't let it happen again in 2012.

Nicks was the No. 2 ranked guard by <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>, yielding only eight pressures all season.  He had the second-highest pass blocking efficiency in the NFL, allowing a sack, hit or pressure on just 1.4% of pass plays.  Nicks is a dominant run blocker as well.  Saints running backs averaged a ridiculous 5.96 yards-per-carry when Nicks was at the point-of-attack this season.  Compare those numbers with the Cowboys' interior linemen (above).  Dallas backs averaged less than four yards per carry when running behind Holland in 2011, and he's a player whose run blocking I praised as solid.

Personally, I don't think the acquisition of Nicks means the team should automatically forget about switching Free's position.  A tackle-to-guard transition might not seem as appealing with Nicks in town, but an offensive line of Smith, Nicks, Kosier (who can play center), Free, and a rookie right tackle looks pretty damn good to me.  Throw in Holland and Phil Costa as backups, and you're all set.

Either way, Nicks is a player who the Cowboys should seriously consider.  He will demand a pretty penny, but guards are repeatedly undervalued.  He's a player on whom to break the bank this offseason.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is an elite quarterback, the Cowboys' running backs need to improve in pass pro, Montrae Holland played very well in 2011, and Phil Costa shouldn't start in 2012


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/how-dallas-cowboys-player-rankings-should-affect-2011-draft-prep/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Player and position rankings for the Dallas Cowboys in 2010,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-skill-position-grades-through-week-7/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7'>Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7</a> <small>Grades for Tony Romo, DeMarco Murray, Miles Austin and others...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

I am going to begin my 2012 Draft coverage early this year, and you can expect it to be superb. . .<strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/draft/">as per usual</a></strong>.  Between those articles you can also expect to find stat analysis of the Cowboys 2011 season.  Below, I have pasted some interesting numbers from both <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/signature.php?tab=signature&amp;pos=qbr" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a> and my own Excel spreadsheets.  Similar defensive statistics to come.

<strong style="color: #000080;">Tony Romo</strong>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo finished the season fourth in the NFL in passer rating at 102.5, behind only Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees and Tom Brady.  That includes a 104.4 rating in the fourth quarter. . .not bad for a "choke artist." </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Taking away drops, spikes and throw aways, Romo's completion percentage was 73.5%. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>On deep passes of 20+ yards, Romo completed 54.8% of his attempts.  That was second in the league to Aaron Rodgers, but only 11.9% of Romo's passes traveled that long--good for only 13th in the league.  He threw 13 touchdowns and only two picks on deep throws.  I've been saying for years the <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tony-romo-directional-passing-why-dallas-should-throw-deep-more-often/">Cowboys would benefit immensely from more deep passes</a>. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo was under pressure on 30.7% of dropbacks, which was 13th highest in league, but completed 56.7% of his passes in these situations.  That was second-best in the NFL to only Drew Brees<span style="color: #000080;">.</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Dez Bryant, Miles Austin and Laurent Robinson</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys quarterbacks had a 110.8 passer rating when throwing to Dez Bryant, which was the 16th-highest of any receiver in the NFL.  Romo threw three of his interceptions when targeting Bryant.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>I have seen some criticisms of Miles Austin lately, even from "expert" Dallas-area writers.  Don't listen to it.  Austin's only problem has been staying healthy, as Romo posted a 117.8 rating when throwing to Austin, including zero interceptions.  That rating is good for 11th among all receivers.  Austin is an elite wide receiver who will have a monster 2012 season if he stays on the field.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Puzzling to me are Austin's drops.  After a 2010 season in which he struggled with dropping passes, Austin let four more get through his hands this season.  That isn't an enormous amount, but it was 8.5% of catchable passes and good for just 37th in the NFL.  I think this is a small sample size at work, though, as just one less drop would shoot Austin up to 23rd.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Meanwhile, Bryant tallied only one drop all season--second-best in the NFL of any receiver who played 25% of his team's snaps.  Only Golden Tate caught every pass possible.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Laurent Robinson caught 58.8% of deep passes (20+ yards) thrown his way, good for third in NFL.  Austin was 10th at 50.0%, and Bryant 29th at 36.8%.  These numbers are misleading, as Robinson is very rarely the first read on plays.  If he is thrown to, chances are he's fairly open.  Bryant gets balls in double-coverage, and so we'd expect his deep catch rate to be lower.  Larry Fitzgerald, for example, was just 24th in the NFL at 41.2%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Robinson tallied 2.18 yards per route--the top number on the Cowboys.</strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones were both solid at avoiding defenders in 2011, tallying 3.01 and 2.98 yards-after-contact/attempt.  Those rates were 10th and 11th in the league.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray had 36.8% of his yardage come on runs of 15+ yards, which was the 12th-highest rate in the NFL.  Jones was 31st at 26.4%.  Again, this stat can be misleading.  While you always want big plays, a really high "big run rate" can be an indicator that a running back will regress to the mean the following season, rushing for fewer big plays and seeing a decrease in both total yards and yards per attempt.  Murray and Jones are both breakaway players, and I'd expect both of them to be around 35% in any given season.  As an example of how much these numbers can fluctuate, consider that Jones saw 44.0% of his yards come on big plays in 2009, compared to just 15.3% last season.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones were 24th and 26th, respectively, in catch rate at 89.7% and 89.2%</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones both need to improve in pass protection.  Jones allowed a pressure, hit or sack on 6.3% of snaps he was in pass pro.  This was just the 41st-best mark in the NFL.  Murray's 9.7% number came in at 62nd in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Jason Witten dropped 3.61% of balls thrown his way (three total), good for 10th in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>13.5% of Witten's snaps came in the slot.  That was just the 17th-highest percentage for tight ends, and the rate was well behind the top 10 (all of whom played 25+% snaps in slot). </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten was 12th in yards per route at 1.69.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten blocked on only 9.4% of pass plays, well below his rate in past seasons.  He was 18th in the NFL with 3.9% of snaps resulting in a pressure, hit or sack.  Martellus Bennett was 17th, with 3.8% of his snaps resulting in some sort of pressure.  It confirms the notion that Witten and Bennett are similar in pass protection (although Bennett is far superior as a run blocker).  Bennett blocked on 20.1% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Offensive Line</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The entire offensive line was 14th overall in pass blocking efficiency, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on 18.5% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Tyron Smith was the league's 14th most efficient tackle in terms of pass protection, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on just 4.0% of pass plays.  Free was 48th with 6.3%.  He also allowed 10 sacks, which was sixth-worst in the NFL. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn't start in 2012, although he probably will. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Bill Nagy allowed pressure on 4.1% of pass plays, good for 41st in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyzing the Top Tier Offensive Tackles in 2012 NFL Draft</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scouting reports on Matt Kalil, Jonathan Martin and Riley Reiff


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/dallas-cowboys-draft-usc-ot-tyron-smith-no-9-overall/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Initial reactions to the Cowboys selecting USC offensive tackle Tyron...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-potential-draft-pick-in-2011-anthony-castonzo-ot-boston-college/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Scouting report on Boston College offensive tackle Anthony Castonzo, including...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Justin Shoemaker

<em>Editor's Note: A few days ago, we had an article published in the Dallas Observer which argued <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2012/01/cowboys-giants-recap.php" target="_blank">why Doug Free should be moved to guard</a></strong>.  In addition to his contract being a sunk cost and rookie right tackle Tyron Smith being ready to make the switch to the left side, there will also (likely) be a top tier offensive tackle available for Dallas with the 14th overall selection.  While the team needs all the help it can get on defense, selecting an OT in the first round would instantly upgrade two positions.  DCT contributor Justin Shoemaker took some time to analyze the top three offensive tackle prospects in the 2012 NFL Draft.</em>

<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Matt Kalil (USC)</strong></span>

- sole reason Tyron Smith played right tackle for USC

-incredible footwork and very nimble for a  6’7'' guy. . .has the size to dominate in the power running game but the quickness to get out on counters, tosses and screens

- very comparable to Joe Thomas and Jake Long. . .has tools to be All-Pro

- unless Dallas moves up, he will be out of reach (likely No. 2 overall)

- Note from Jonathan: When I began studying Tyron Smith last year, I just assumed he was a left tackle.  After a couple plays I realized the player I was reviewing was white, so I had a pretty good idea I wasn't watching Smith.  I kept watching, though, because that player (Kalil) was absolutely dominant.  I can say I wholeheartedly believe Kalil is the top offensive tackle prospect I have seen. . .ever.  He's superior to Thomas and Long, in my opinions, and he will be an All-Pro for a decade.

<strong><span style="color: #a93022;">Jonathan Martin (Stanford)</span></strong>

- has protected Andrew Luck, but may have looked better than reality due to Luck's quick release (in much the same way Peyton Manning has made his average line look elite)

- surprisingly better in run blocking than pass protection

- versatile enough to play RT or LT; can set the edge, but still has agility to get to second level

- can play aggressively and with an attitude at times, but then becomes defensive and gives up too much ground to the pass rusher.

- seems to struggle when matched up on nine-technique players or 3-4 outside linebackers; thrives against "power" seven or five-technique rushers

- still has plenty of room to improve technique; would be instant upgrade over Free, even at right tackle

<span style="color: #ffcc00;"><strong>Riley Reiff (Iowa)</strong></span>

-typical Big 10 lineman, which means everyone loves the run blocking ability. . .will have more knocks on his pass protection

-can get a little stiff and awkward in both run blocking and pass protection; not a natural athlete like Kalil or Martin

-great awareness of the pocket and pushing the defender beyond it; will let defenders rush themselves out of play

-could be beast in various run blocking schemes, but may not fit as well for the Cowboys if they plan to incorporate more "finesse" runs with Murray and Jones

- no quit attitude until the whistle blows, play contagious to teammates (he's a Marc Colombo with skill)

-very much like fellow Hawkeye Bryan Bulaga,

- probably not enough value at No. 14

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 17: How Dallas Can Win the NFC East</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas in Week 17


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup'>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</a> <small>The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In addition to my article for the Times on <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/how-dallas-should-attack-giants-pass-defense/" target="_blank">how Dallas can beat Cover 2 Man Under</a></strong> this weekend in the Meadowlands, I also did a piece for the <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">Dallas Observer</a></strong>.  Head over there to check out my <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas</a>. </strong>Along with more analysis of the coverage which irritated Dallas in Week 14, I add a full game plan for the 'Boys.  Here are some of the highlights:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Don't blitz often.  Eli Manning's passer rating against the blitz is very comparable to that when four or less defenders rush him, but the Cowboys do not have the talent in the secondary to deal with a blitz that fails.  The team should be in the business of playing aggressively while still allowing for a chance to win the game late, and yielding quick scores due to unsuccessful blitz attempts won't help.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The 'Boys should mimic the Giants' Week 14 game plan by playing a lot of Cover 2 Man Under.  By keeping everything in front of them, the defense can maximize their chances of halting Hakeem Nicks and Victor Cruz and force either a tight end or a running back to beat them.  Although Brandon Jacobs wore down Dallas in the teams' last meeting, Ahmad Bradshaw is the more likely of the two to give Dallas fits this week.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Giants pass a lot out of double-tight formations, so the Cowboys cannot sell out to defend the run when they see the look.  The G-Men used a double-tight set 34 times in Week 14, so the 'Boys better be ready for it.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Cowboys, on the other hand, do tip their play calls via their formation, personnel package, or down-and-distance.  Jason Garrett could benefit from being a bit less predictable this week.  Garrett's predictability could be utilized to get the ball downfield with play action. But since 2009, Dallas quarterbacks have thrown for 20-plus yards on only 8.7 percent of play-action passes. And in two-plus years of passes, Garrett has called a play-action pass only eight times with 1-4 yards-to-go for a first down -- the situations when faking a run would actually work. Instead, he's called for a play-action look on 11 plays with 20-plus yards-to-go, when showing a running play is either an obvious decoy or hopeless.</strong></li>
</ul>
For additional analysis, <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">head over to the Observer</a></strong> and leave your comments there.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Grading the 'Boys"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the remainder of the season


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-defensive-linelinebackers/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Sean Lee has played better than Jay Ratliff, and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-times-final-2010-player-position-rankings/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Victor Butler and Martellus Bennett over Dez Bryant? Orlando Scandrick...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Believe it or not, the Dallas Cowboys are going to see a dramatic downgrade at guard with the loss of Montrae Holland to a torn biceps.  I have been critical of Holland in the past, providing him with a C+ grade in my <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/01/grading-the-boys-in-2010-part-vii-offensive-line/" target="_blank">2010 Offensive Line Grades</a></strong>.  Holland is not an incredible athlete and can appear slow-footed at times, often struggling with quick defensive tackles.  Nonetheless, he outplayed every Cowboys offensive linemen not named Tyron Smith in 2011.  Here is why. . .

Holland participated in 641 snaps this season, 361 of which were in pass protection.  He yielded eight pressures, one hit and two sacks in those snaps, good for a pressure rate of 2.21%.  While not at an elite level, that rate is still quite good.  As a comparison, right guard Kyle Kosier has a pressure rate of 2.85% this season.  That falls right in line with his pressure rate of 2.82% from 2010, providing a statistically significant sample size.  You can see the overall 2010 numbers below.

[caption id="attachment_8652" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="  "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-8652" title="2010 OL Pass Pro" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1-300x192.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="192" /></a>[/caption]

Many of you know I often praise Kosier's pass protection ability, and Holland has been superior to the veteran in 2011.  To get a broader sense of Holland's 2011 success, I took a look at the numbers of some of the top-graded guards (and middle tier guards) on <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>.

[caption id="attachment_9372" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9372" title="Guard Pressure Rates 2011" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011-300x158.png" alt="" width="300" height="158" /></a>[/caption]

You can see Holland's pressure rate, although not elite, was well above-average.  The #32 and #33 ranked guards at PFF surrendered pressure rates up to 46% higher than Holland's.  On top of that, I would grade Holland as the Cowboys' second-best run blocker all season if I was turning in my grades today.  I would provide him with a 'B' in both run blocking and pass protection, and that run blocking grade will undoubtedly be higher than all non-rookie offensive linemen in Big D.

Whether Derrick Dockery or Kevin Kowalski replaces Holland, the Cowboys will see a decline in production.  Holland was having a really strong 2011 campaign. . .and one which was being overlooked even by me.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking Cowboys&#8217; Improvements Over Last Decade</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using EPA to track the historic performance of the Dallas Cowboys


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/rob-ryans-defensive-fronts-the-46-psycho-and-cloud/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing Rob Ryan's defensive fronts, including the "46," "Psycho," and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/03/rob-ryans-zone-blitzes-how-teams-attack-fire-zones-and-how-dallas-can-respond/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>The title says it all....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/11/predictability-remains-in-jason-garretts-play-calling/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling'>Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling</a> <small>Analyzing predictability within Jason Garrett's play-calling and how the Cowboys...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Over at <strong><a href="http://wp.advancednflstats.com/yearstatvisualization.php" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a></strong>, a new feature has taken the world (my world) by storm.  If you click on the link, you can see the offensive and defensive "Expected Points Added" (a metric used to grade each play of a football game--a touchdown obviously has an EPA of six, while a 1st and Goal at the one-yard line is very close that number).  By tracking EPA, you can determine which teams are playing well, even if it is not reflected in their record, and which have simply been lucky.  For us here at DCT, we can take a look at the improvements of the Cowboys over the past decade.  Click on the link above to check out the graphs, or just scroll below.

[caption id="attachment_9304" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9304" title="DAL EPA per game" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-300x216.png" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a>[/caption]

In the first graph, you can see the Cowboys' historic offensive performance as compared to their defensive efficiency.  A few notes:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Since Jason Garrett has taken over as the offensive coordinator, the Cowboys have had well above-average offensive efficiency in every year except for 2008. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Their best season over the last decade, as you might guess, was in 2007.  This season has fallen right in line with 2006 and 2009. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Somewhat surprisingly, the best defenses in Dallas were in the first part of the 2000s.  Since Garrett has been in town, the Cowboys have been below-average on defense, in terms of EPA, every year.</strong></li>
</ul>
[caption id="attachment_9305" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9305" title="DAL EPA per game offense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense-300x105.png" alt="" width="300" height="105" /></a>[/caption]

Above, you can track the Cowboys' offensive improvements over the last 10+ years.  The most important aspect of this graph, in my view, is the fact that offensive performance is leveling out under Garrett.  Yes, the offense has been really solid during Garrett's tenure, but we see the team was moving in that direction since 2002.  There are two ways to look at this. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>The first is that Garrett is overrated as an offensive coordinator because the offense improved for multiple years since 2002 and their play has been stagnant since Garrett took over.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The other way to view the graph is that the Cowboys were bound to improve since their horrible 2002 campaign, and Garrett's ability to keep the offense around the 5.0 EPA/G mark is a testament to his ability. </strong></li>
</ul>
I think we are seeing more of the second explanation than the first.  If the Cowboys were consistently ranked No. 1 in offense each year, we wouldn't say Garrett has shown an inability to improve as a coordinator.  When teams are playing at either a very high or very low level, we are sure to see their play regress to the mean.  This is one reason why it should be a coach's dream to take over a 1-15 team.  Even if the coach does absolutely nothing right, the team will likely win more games the following season, and the coach will be viewed as "improving" his squad.  The fact that the offensive EPA has "leveled out" with Garrett here is a good thing.

Onto the defense. . .

[caption id="attachment_9306" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9306" title="DAL EPA per game defense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense-300x100.png" alt="" width="300" height="100" /></a>[/caption]

This is where the Cowboys need to improve to become a Championship-caliber football team.  Still, the "decline" in defensive production since the early part of the decade is not as drastic as it seems.  The Cowboys have become a far better offensive football team over the last five years because they have been able to throw the ball well.  In the early part of the 2000s, that wasn't the case.  The team opted to shorten games under head coach Bill Parcells, and that resulted in a superior EPA/G as compared to the current defense.

It is not the job of a coach to maximize offensive or defensive EPA, however, but rather to create the largest gap between their team and the opposition.  EPA is not an efficiency stat as we are using it here, so the "superior" EPA/G displayed by the early-2000s Cowboys does not <em>necessarily </em>represent a better defensive football team.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Film Obervations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14 loss to the Giants


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/assessing-football-strategy-is-running-the-football-often-necessary/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing the merits of short kickoffs, rushing the ball often,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/another-epic-collapse-thoughts-on-cowboys-week-14-loss-to-giants/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants'>Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants</a> <small>Why the Cowboys should have let the Giants score late,...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

One of my favorite things to do when I watch the Cowboys' games at home is track the team's win probability throughout the night using <a href="http://live.advancednflstats.com/index.php?gameid1=2011121113" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>' win probability charts.  Using a model which takes the down-and-distance, score, and time into account, ANS is able to determine the probability of a team winning a game at any point in time.  This information doesn't stem from estimates, but rather years of NFL data.

It is always fascinating to see how certain plays can influence a team's chances of winning.  Punts, for example, often result in a fairly significant drop in win probability because giving away possession is generally detrimental to a team.  Near the beginning of games, it takes a huge play to swing win probability in a major way.  A 4th and Goal defensive stop while up six points with 45 minutes to play might result in a big bump in win probability, but that same play would be much larger--perhaps from around 50% to 100%--if the play was the final one of the game.

Using the graph from Sunday night's game, I thought it would be fun to take a look at which plays affected the Cowboys' win probability most significantly.  Below, you can see the chart, along with 10 plays (or short sequences) which I have labeled as the most important. . .

[caption id="attachment_9270" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="CLICK TO ENLARGE "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9270 " title="Cowboys Giants Week 14 Win Probability" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability-300x191.png" alt="" width="300" height="191" /></a>[/caption]

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 1: 64-yard pass to Hakeem Nicks on 3rd and 7 at NYG 32; 53:44 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP (win probability) drops from 42 to 25 (-17%)</strong></li>
</ul>
A 17% drop in win probability in the middle of the first quarter is a big one.  This wouldn't have been much higher even if Nicks scored.  Poor coverage by Alan Ball.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 2: 26-yard gain by Felix Jones on 1st and 10 at NYG 42; 48:19 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 42 to 52 (+10%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The touchdown pass to John Phillips put Dallas on top, but Jones and a subsequent defensive holding penalty put the 'Boys in position to score.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 3: Felix Jones fumbles on 1st and 10 and ball recovered by NYG at DAL 14; 31:38 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 57 to 38 (-19%)</strong></li>
</ul>
This had the potential to be devastating to Dallas but they made the best of the situation by holding New York to a field goal and kicking one of their own before halftime.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 4: 47-yard touchdown pass to Mario Manningham on 3rd and 5 at DAL 47; 19:39 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 70 to 45 (-25%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Yielding a 47-yard score on a crucial 3rd down due to a broken coverage is heartbreaking.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 5: 74-yard pass to Laurent Robinson on 3rd and 10 at DAL 20; 13:17 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 38 to 66 (+28%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Other than the blocked field goal to end the game, this pass to Robinson was the most important one of the contest for Dallas.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 6: 15-yard completion to Mario Manningham on 4th and 3 at DAL 37; 8:24 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 78 to 56 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Here, you can see how game situation affects win probability.  The pass was only 15 yards long, but it came on a crucial 4th and 3 with just over eight minutes left to play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 7: Sean Lee interception on 3rd and 9 at DAL 21; 6:50 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 62 to 89 (+27%)</strong></li>
</ul>
I actually thought this would be more valuable to Dallas, but the fact that it came on a difficult 3rd and 9 (when New York's chances of converting were low) likely affected the jump in WP.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 8: Cowboys' three-and-out; 2:20 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 88 to 67 (-21%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Romo's infamous incompletion to Austin hurt Dallas in a big way.  If you assume Romo hits that pass 90% of the time and Dallas' wins 99% of games following a completion, the actual dip in WP would be closer to -31%.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 9: Holding on Abram Elam and 18-yard completion to Jake Ballard on 1st and 10 at DAL 19; 1:21 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 49 to 27 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The holding penalty on Elam has been overlooked.  DeMarcus Ware's offside penalty was also costly, but the full extent of it isn't factored into the WP chart because the errant snap and loss by the Giants isn't reflected in the play-by-play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 10: Blocked FG; 0:06 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 44 to &lt;1 (-43%)</strong></li>
</ul>
And the Cowboys' playoff chances drop from potentially around 90% with a win to now around 40% .

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Watch (Game Preview)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-review-romo-at-fault/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Thoughts on the Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with the New...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/cowboys-must-capitalize-on-takeaways/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why the Cowboys must capitalize when they force turnovers, and...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it (everyone, I'm assuming), I had an article published on The New York Times' football blog <em>The Fifth Down </em>titled <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/keys-to-defeating-dallas-from-a-cowboys-writer/" target="_blank">Keys to Defeating Dallas, From a Cowboys Writer</a></strong>.  You can (and should) click on the link to read it.

Before I receive the inevitable backlash for writing such blasphemous content, let me point out that this article is not much different than my traditional "DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas" weekly post.  Instead of explaining what Dallas needs to do for a win, however, I simply flipped the script.  "Protect Doug Free" would have been sound advice for Dallas this week, and you will find a corresponding "Attack Doug Free" bullet point in my New York Times piece.

You can find all of my thoughts on the Week 14 matchup in that post.  Here, I wanted to take a look at the broader picture, assessing both the Cowboys' and Giants' odds of making the playoffs after the contest.  There are a number of ways to do that.  In this article, I will conduct a schedule analysis, estimating the odds of each team winning their remaining games and determining how that relates to the subsequent importance of this particular matchup for each squad.

In the beginning of the season, the importance of the strength of a team's schedule is very overblown, and for a variety of reasons.  First, when comparing the schedules of two division opponents, the 14 games which are not head-to-head contain just two dissimilarities, i.e. the Giants and Cowboys had just two opponents which differed.  Secondly, the constant talent flux in the NFL makes preseason predictions in regards to a team's strength of schedule almost useless.  Who wold have thought the Raiders, Bengals, Bills, Lions, etc. would not be "easy wins" in 2011?  Lastly, the overall strength of a schedule tends to even out over the course of a 16-game season.  Simply put, preseason strength of schedule sucks as a method by which to analyze a team's playoff hopes.

By Week 14, however, a team's remaining schedule has a huge influence in their odds of making the playoffs.  Over the course of four games, it is certainly possible to have three or four strong/weak opponents, meaning the schedule doesn't necessarily have time to "even out."  Plus, we already know the relative strength of each NFL team, so estimating each team's win probability for a single game is far easier.

With all of that said, let's take a look at the Giants' and Cowboys' remaining schedules, along with the probability they win each game. . .

[caption id="attachment_9257" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9257" title="Dallas Cowboys New York Giants 2011 WP" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP-300x164.png" alt="" width="300" height="164" /></a>[/caption]

While the probabilities I used are "just" estimates, they are well-researched, solid estimates using advanced statistics gathered from <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/team-rankings-week-fourteen.html" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>.  Using their Generic Win Probability (the odds a team will win a game against a league-average opponent at a neutral site), we can estimate the chances of Dallas and New York winning each remaining game by combining the teams' GWP and factoring in home field advantage.  Thus, while I am "guessing" the odds of wins for the teams in their remaining contests, those probabilities are likely not too far from reality.

If we give each team a win total that directly correlates with their probabilities, i.e. the Cowboys' 54% chance of winning this week's matchup equates to ".54 wins," you can see the Cowboys' theoretical win total for the rest of the 2011 season is 2.37, while the Giants' is 2.40.  That difference is obviously not statistically significant, meaning the small errors which are undoubtedly contained within my win probability projections are surely enough to "make up for" this difference.

In other words, the Cowboys and Giants can be expected to win the same number of games moving forward.  Note that this conclusion does not mean the teams <em>will</em> win the same number of games, but rather that their chances of doing so are the most likely of all possible outcomes.

So what does this all mean for their playoff chances?  The incredible similarity between the teams and their win probability moving forward means that each's respective chances of making the playoffs, even after we factor in the schedule, are roughly the same as if they were both of league-average quality.

Think of it this way: if a team of the same quality of the Colts was 7-5 (like Dallas) and one with a talent level comparable to that of Green Bay was 6-6 (like New York), we'd still expect Green Bay's odds of making the playoffs to be greater due to their far higher win probability in each game.  The role of chance in that situation is less powerful than in the case of the 'Boys and G-Men.

In the latter comparison, we have two teams whose win probabilities for the remainder of the season are roughly equal.  This means that the chances of the Giants making the playoffs, taking their one-game deficit into account, are roughly the same as if we flipped a coin to determine the outcome of each contest.  Perform 10,000 coin flip simulations to allow the numbers to regress to the mean, and you will be left with each team's playoff chances.

Luckily, we have computers which can simulate seasons, so we don't need to waste time flipping a coin.  Over at <a href="http://files.nfl-forecast.com/archives/120" target="_blank">NFL-Forecast.com</a>, they have determined each team's chances of making the playoffs based on thousands of simulations with the GWP provided by Advanced NFL Stats.  If you head over there, you will see the odds of Dallas winning the NFC East are around 64%, with their overall playoff chances adding up to nearly 69% (meaning there is little chance they earn a Wild Card spot).  The Giants' odds are 35% to win the division and 36% to make the playoffs.

In terms of particular scenarios, the Cowboys will win the division if they beat the Giants in both of the clubs' remaining games.  If the Giants perform the same task, they will win the division as long as they do not lose both of their other two games <em>or</em> the Cowboys do not win both of their other games.  Simply put, if one squad wins both head-to-head games, they are effectively the NFC East champs.

If the more probable splitting of head-to-head games occurs, the Cowboys are in with one more win.  Let me break it down for you.  If the teams split and the Cowboys lose to Philly and beat Tampa Bay, for example, they would finish 9-7 and possess the same record as the Giants if they beat both the Redskins and Jets. Then, intricate tiebreakers would come into play.  As shown on <a href="http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures" target="_blank">NFL.com</a>, those are:
<ol>
	<li>Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference</li>
</ol>
The first tiebreaker would obviously end in a tie following a split.  If the Cowboys lose to either the Eagles and Bucs (and the Giants win against the 'Skins and Jets), the teams would finish 9-7 and both have a division record of 3-3, meaning the third tiebreaker would be a factor.  In common games (all but two, remember), the Giants and Cowboys would again be tied at 9-5 (including their head-to-head split).  Thus, the <em>fourth</em> tiebreaker is needed.  Here, the Cowboys have the advantage, as they will have a superior conference record following a split, no matter how the other games shake out.

Let's recap. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are in the playoffs.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Giants sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are almost assuredly in the playoffs.  They would miss out if they lose both remaining games and the Cowboys win both.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the teams split, the Cowboys are in if they win one of their other games.  If the Cowboys lose both of those games, the Giants are in if they win both of their remaining contests.</strong></li>
</ul>
For Dallas, all of the math equates to one simple conclusion: win this week, and you will almost certainly be NFC East champs.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Jason Garrett&#8217;s Late-Game Clock Management</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Jason Garrett deserves even more blame than he is receiving for his late-game clock management 


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/why-jason-garrett-was-wrong-to-run-late-vs-new-england/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why calling three straight runs in the fourth quarter against...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command'>Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command</a> <small>The title is self-explanatory. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/more-on-jason-garretts-decision-to-run-late-vs-pats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Responding to some reader comments on Jason Garrett's late-game play-calling...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it, I published a rather <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/">harsh criticism of Jason Garrett</a></strong> last night, explaining why his lack of courage is a hindrance to the Dallas Cowboys.  As long as Garrett is punting on 4th and 1 at the opponent's 35-yard line or displaying atrocious (if there was a word that was worse, I would us that) clock management skills, this team will cease to capitalize on their potential.

After time to contemplate the value of his decision to not call a timeout late in the fourth quarter of Sunday's loss, Garrett must surely see the error of his ways, right?  Nope.  <a href="http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/_/id/7317155/dallas-cowboys-jason-garrett-explains-late-game-clock-management-loss-arizona-cardinals" target="_blank">Said Garrett</a>:
<blockquote>We very well could have taken a timeout there. We felt like we were in field-goal range. We have yard lines that we use as guidelines before the game. We felt like we were in range at that point.  Tony had them on the line of scrimmage quickly, so we went ahead and clocked it and used that as a timeout. You see so many situations where you have negative plays in those situations. We felt like we were in (Dan Bailey's) range to give him a chance to kick the game-winner. . .We felt pretty good about where we were. Once you get to that 30-yard line we felt like that was a pretty good opportunity for us.</blockquote>
You cannot be serious, Jason.  There were 23 seconds left on the clock when the Cowboys obtained a first down at the Cardinals' 31-yard line, so Garrett's insinuation that the offense clocked the ball "quickly" is erroneous.  On top of that, spiking the ball "as a timeout" is the entire reason no one in their right mind can understand what was going through your own yesterday.

With two timeouts in hand, how in the world do you not use one with 23 seconds on the clock?  Even if you decide you do not want to try to advance the ball down the field, why not at least give yourself the option?  If you (mistakenly) want to settle for a 49-yard field goal attempt, why not run Romo to the middle of the field, let the clock run down, then attempt the field goal with your kicker in a better spot?

Of course, the no-brainer coaching decision is to immediately call timeout and work harder to get the ball downfield.  Instead, Garrett coached scared, disregarding the numbers in favor of not risking a big loss.  But what are "the numbers"?  Let's see. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>On average, a kicker has a <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/11/just-for-kicks.html" target="_blank">65% chance of converting</a> a 49-yard field goal try.
</strong></li>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys gained six more yards, those odds increase to 75%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys had passed the football, there chances of giving up a sack (based on season averages) were 4.0%.  In reality, they were lower because this wasn't a "normal" game situation and Romo would be more willing to throw the ball away at the first sign of trouble than on, say, a 1st and 10 in the first quarter.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>A loss of six yards would equate to a field goal try on which kickers have displayed around 50% accuracy. </strong></li>
</ul>
For Garrett's decision to let the clock tick down to be correct, we would have to assume the Cowboys' offense has less than a 6% chance of gaining six yards on a passing play.  Anyone think that is the case?  Me neither.

One of the major mistakes Garrett made was in his binary thinking regarding field goals.  Brian Burke of Advanced NFL Stats<a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/unicorns-tooth-fairy-cowboys-and-field.html" target="_blank"> pointed that out</a>, discussing Garrett's black-and-white ideas:
<blockquote>Also, note Garrett's conception of "field goal range." He has a yard line established before the game. That kind of thinking assumes a yes-or-no, black-and-white idea of a field goal attempt. Either you're in range or you're not. If we're in "range", and the kicker misses, well, that's his fault. This is a failure to think in probabilistic terms.</blockquote>
The sort of false dichotomy Garrett displayed with his thinking shows he either does not understand statistics at a fundamental level, or he understands them and coaches to limit the blame which could be placed upon him after defeat, instead exposing his players to it.  I think it is the latter.  Unfortunately for Dallas, cowards don't win Super Bowls.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tony Romo Directional Passing: Why Dallas Should Throw Deep More Often</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/film-studystats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com</link>
	<description>Unrivaled Dallas Cowboys Info 24/7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys Times &#187; Film Study/Stat Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/film-studystats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com</link>
	<description>Unrivaled Dallas Cowboys Info 24/7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should the Cowboys Make a Run at G Carl Nicks?</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl Nicks will be the top free agent guard on the market this offseason.  Should Dallas jump on him?


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think'>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</a> <small>Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats'>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</a> <small>Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In the past week or so, I have written extensively on the Cowboys' offensive line.  In my last post (a look at some <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/">interesting offensive statistics</a></strong> from 2011), I hit you with these numbers:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn’t start in 2012, although he probably will.</strong></li>
</ul>
It is pretty clear the interior line is in disarray in Dallas, and something needs to be done to fix it.  I suggested <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-where-should-doug-free-play/">moving Doug Free to right guard</a></strong> and drafting a right tackle in the first round (with Tyron Smith obviously kicking to the left side).  There are some pros and cons to that plan, but I like it because it instantly upgrades two spots.

Others have suggested the Cowboys might make a run at impending <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4689477/could-cowboys-make-play-for-carl-nicks?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">free agent guard Carl Nicks</a>, though.  Although Jerry Jones has refrained from signing big-money free agents since Jason Garrett has taken over as head coach, this is one I actually believe the 'Boys should jump all over.  Here's why.

Nicks will command a hefty contract, but guards are continually underpaid in the NFL.  He won't garner nearly as much money as an elite left tackle, but his impact (for Dallas, especially) isn't that much less than his tackle counterpart.  We saw how much a weak interior line can affect an offense in 2011.  Don't let it happen again in 2012.

Nicks was the No. 2 ranked guard by <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>, yielding only eight pressures all season.  He had the second-highest pass blocking efficiency in the NFL, allowing a sack, hit or pressure on just 1.4% of pass plays.  Nicks is a dominant run blocker as well.  Saints running backs averaged a ridiculous 5.96 yards-per-carry when Nicks was at the point-of-attack this season.  Compare those numbers with the Cowboys' interior linemen (above).  Dallas backs averaged less than four yards per carry when running behind Holland in 2011, and he's a player whose run blocking I praised as solid.

Personally, I don't think the acquisition of Nicks means the team should automatically forget about switching Free's position.  A tackle-to-guard transition might not seem as appealing with Nicks in town, but an offensive line of Smith, Nicks, Kosier (who can play center), Free, and a rookie right tackle looks pretty damn good to me.  Throw in Holland and Phil Costa as backups, and you're all set.

Either way, Nicks is a player who the Cowboys should seriously consider.  He will demand a pretty penny, but guards are repeatedly undervalued.  He's a player on whom to break the bank this offseason.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is an elite quarterback, the Cowboys' running backs need to improve in pass pro, Montrae Holland played very well in 2011, and Phil Costa shouldn't start in 2012


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/how-dallas-cowboys-player-rankings-should-affect-2011-draft-prep/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Player and position rankings for the Dallas Cowboys in 2010,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-skill-position-grades-through-week-7/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7'>Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7</a> <small>Grades for Tony Romo, DeMarco Murray, Miles Austin and others...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

I am going to begin my 2012 Draft coverage early this year, and you can expect it to be superb. . .<strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/draft/">as per usual</a></strong>.  Between those articles you can also expect to find stat analysis of the Cowboys 2011 season.  Below, I have pasted some interesting numbers from both <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/signature.php?tab=signature&amp;pos=qbr" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a> and my own Excel spreadsheets.  Similar defensive statistics to come.

<strong style="color: #000080;">Tony Romo</strong>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo finished the season fourth in the NFL in passer rating at 102.5, behind only Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees and Tom Brady.  That includes a 104.4 rating in the fourth quarter. . .not bad for a "choke artist." </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Taking away drops, spikes and throw aways, Romo's completion percentage was 73.5%. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>On deep passes of 20+ yards, Romo completed 54.8% of his attempts.  That was second in the league to Aaron Rodgers, but only 11.9% of Romo's passes traveled that long--good for only 13th in the league.  He threw 13 touchdowns and only two picks on deep throws.  I've been saying for years the <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tony-romo-directional-passing-why-dallas-should-throw-deep-more-often/">Cowboys would benefit immensely from more deep passes</a>. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo was under pressure on 30.7% of dropbacks, which was 13th highest in league, but completed 56.7% of his passes in these situations.  That was second-best in the NFL to only Drew Brees<span style="color: #000080;">.</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Dez Bryant, Miles Austin and Laurent Robinson</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys quarterbacks had a 110.8 passer rating when throwing to Dez Bryant, which was the 16th-highest of any receiver in the NFL.  Romo threw three of his interceptions when targeting Bryant.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>I have seen some criticisms of Miles Austin lately, even from "expert" Dallas-area writers.  Don't listen to it.  Austin's only problem has been staying healthy, as Romo posted a 117.8 rating when throwing to Austin, including zero interceptions.  That rating is good for 11th among all receivers.  Austin is an elite wide receiver who will have a monster 2012 season if he stays on the field.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Puzzling to me are Austin's drops.  After a 2010 season in which he struggled with dropping passes, Austin let four more get through his hands this season.  That isn't an enormous amount, but it was 8.5% of catchable passes and good for just 37th in the NFL.  I think this is a small sample size at work, though, as just one less drop would shoot Austin up to 23rd.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Meanwhile, Bryant tallied only one drop all season--second-best in the NFL of any receiver who played 25% of his team's snaps.  Only Golden Tate caught every pass possible.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Laurent Robinson caught 58.8% of deep passes (20+ yards) thrown his way, good for third in NFL.  Austin was 10th at 50.0%, and Bryant 29th at 36.8%.  These numbers are misleading, as Robinson is very rarely the first read on plays.  If he is thrown to, chances are he's fairly open.  Bryant gets balls in double-coverage, and so we'd expect his deep catch rate to be lower.  Larry Fitzgerald, for example, was just 24th in the NFL at 41.2%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Robinson tallied 2.18 yards per route--the top number on the Cowboys.</strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones were both solid at avoiding defenders in 2011, tallying 3.01 and 2.98 yards-after-contact/attempt.  Those rates were 10th and 11th in the league.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray had 36.8% of his yardage come on runs of 15+ yards, which was the 12th-highest rate in the NFL.  Jones was 31st at 26.4%.  Again, this stat can be misleading.  While you always want big plays, a really high "big run rate" can be an indicator that a running back will regress to the mean the following season, rushing for fewer big plays and seeing a decrease in both total yards and yards per attempt.  Murray and Jones are both breakaway players, and I'd expect both of them to be around 35% in any given season.  As an example of how much these numbers can fluctuate, consider that Jones saw 44.0% of his yards come on big plays in 2009, compared to just 15.3% last season.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones were 24th and 26th, respectively, in catch rate at 89.7% and 89.2%</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones both need to improve in pass protection.  Jones allowed a pressure, hit or sack on 6.3% of snaps he was in pass pro.  This was just the 41st-best mark in the NFL.  Murray's 9.7% number came in at 62nd in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Jason Witten dropped 3.61% of balls thrown his way (three total), good for 10th in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>13.5% of Witten's snaps came in the slot.  That was just the 17th-highest percentage for tight ends, and the rate was well behind the top 10 (all of whom played 25+% snaps in slot). </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten was 12th in yards per route at 1.69.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten blocked on only 9.4% of pass plays, well below his rate in past seasons.  He was 18th in the NFL with 3.9% of snaps resulting in a pressure, hit or sack.  Martellus Bennett was 17th, with 3.8% of his snaps resulting in some sort of pressure.  It confirms the notion that Witten and Bennett are similar in pass protection (although Bennett is far superior as a run blocker).  Bennett blocked on 20.1% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Offensive Line</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The entire offensive line was 14th overall in pass blocking efficiency, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on 18.5% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Tyron Smith was the league's 14th most efficient tackle in terms of pass protection, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on just 4.0% of pass plays.  Free was 48th with 6.3%.  He also allowed 10 sacks, which was sixth-worst in the NFL. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn't start in 2012, although he probably will. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Bill Nagy allowed pressure on 4.1% of pass plays, good for 41st in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyzing the Top Tier Offensive Tackles in 2012 NFL Draft</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scouting reports on Matt Kalil, Jonathan Martin and Riley Reiff


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/dallas-cowboys-draft-usc-ot-tyron-smith-no-9-overall/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Initial reactions to the Cowboys selecting USC offensive tackle Tyron...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-potential-draft-pick-in-2011-anthony-castonzo-ot-boston-college/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Scouting report on Boston College offensive tackle Anthony Castonzo, including...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Justin Shoemaker

<em>Editor's Note: A few days ago, we had an article published in the Dallas Observer which argued <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2012/01/cowboys-giants-recap.php" target="_blank">why Doug Free should be moved to guard</a></strong>.  In addition to his contract being a sunk cost and rookie right tackle Tyron Smith being ready to make the switch to the left side, there will also (likely) be a top tier offensive tackle available for Dallas with the 14th overall selection.  While the team needs all the help it can get on defense, selecting an OT in the first round would instantly upgrade two positions.  DCT contributor Justin Shoemaker took some time to analyze the top three offensive tackle prospects in the 2012 NFL Draft.</em>

<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Matt Kalil (USC)</strong></span>

- sole reason Tyron Smith played right tackle for USC

-incredible footwork and very nimble for a  6’7'' guy. . .has the size to dominate in the power running game but the quickness to get out on counters, tosses and screens

- very comparable to Joe Thomas and Jake Long. . .has tools to be All-Pro

- unless Dallas moves up, he will be out of reach (likely No. 2 overall)

- Note from Jonathan: When I began studying Tyron Smith last year, I just assumed he was a left tackle.  After a couple plays I realized the player I was reviewing was white, so I had a pretty good idea I wasn't watching Smith.  I kept watching, though, because that player (Kalil) was absolutely dominant.  I can say I wholeheartedly believe Kalil is the top offensive tackle prospect I have seen. . .ever.  He's superior to Thomas and Long, in my opinions, and he will be an All-Pro for a decade.

<strong><span style="color: #a93022;">Jonathan Martin (Stanford)</span></strong>

- has protected Andrew Luck, but may have looked better than reality due to Luck's quick release (in much the same way Peyton Manning has made his average line look elite)

- surprisingly better in run blocking than pass protection

- versatile enough to play RT or LT; can set the edge, but still has agility to get to second level

- can play aggressively and with an attitude at times, but then becomes defensive and gives up too much ground to the pass rusher.

- seems to struggle when matched up on nine-technique players or 3-4 outside linebackers; thrives against "power" seven or five-technique rushers

- still has plenty of room to improve technique; would be instant upgrade over Free, even at right tackle

<span style="color: #ffcc00;"><strong>Riley Reiff (Iowa)</strong></span>

-typical Big 10 lineman, which means everyone loves the run blocking ability. . .will have more knocks on his pass protection

-can get a little stiff and awkward in both run blocking and pass protection; not a natural athlete like Kalil or Martin

-great awareness of the pocket and pushing the defender beyond it; will let defenders rush themselves out of play

-could be beast in various run blocking schemes, but may not fit as well for the Cowboys if they plan to incorporate more "finesse" runs with Murray and Jones

- no quit attitude until the whistle blows, play contagious to teammates (he's a Marc Colombo with skill)

-very much like fellow Hawkeye Bryan Bulaga,

- probably not enough value at No. 14

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 17: How Dallas Can Win the NFC East</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas in Week 17


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup'>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</a> <small>The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In addition to my article for the Times on <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/how-dallas-should-attack-giants-pass-defense/" target="_blank">how Dallas can beat Cover 2 Man Under</a></strong> this weekend in the Meadowlands, I also did a piece for the <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">Dallas Observer</a></strong>.  Head over there to check out my <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas</a>. </strong>Along with more analysis of the coverage which irritated Dallas in Week 14, I add a full game plan for the 'Boys.  Here are some of the highlights:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Don't blitz often.  Eli Manning's passer rating against the blitz is very comparable to that when four or less defenders rush him, but the Cowboys do not have the talent in the secondary to deal with a blitz that fails.  The team should be in the business of playing aggressively while still allowing for a chance to win the game late, and yielding quick scores due to unsuccessful blitz attempts won't help.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The 'Boys should mimic the Giants' Week 14 game plan by playing a lot of Cover 2 Man Under.  By keeping everything in front of them, the defense can maximize their chances of halting Hakeem Nicks and Victor Cruz and force either a tight end or a running back to beat them.  Although Brandon Jacobs wore down Dallas in the teams' last meeting, Ahmad Bradshaw is the more likely of the two to give Dallas fits this week.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Giants pass a lot out of double-tight formations, so the Cowboys cannot sell out to defend the run when they see the look.  The G-Men used a double-tight set 34 times in Week 14, so the 'Boys better be ready for it.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Cowboys, on the other hand, do tip their play calls via their formation, personnel package, or down-and-distance.  Jason Garrett could benefit from being a bit less predictable this week.  Garrett's predictability could be utilized to get the ball downfield with play action. But since 2009, Dallas quarterbacks have thrown for 20-plus yards on only 8.7 percent of play-action passes. And in two-plus years of passes, Garrett has called a play-action pass only eight times with 1-4 yards-to-go for a first down -- the situations when faking a run would actually work. Instead, he's called for a play-action look on 11 plays with 20-plus yards-to-go, when showing a running play is either an obvious decoy or hopeless.</strong></li>
</ul>
For additional analysis, <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">head over to the Observer</a></strong> and leave your comments there.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Grading the 'Boys"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the remainder of the season


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-defensive-linelinebackers/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Sean Lee has played better than Jay Ratliff, and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-times-final-2010-player-position-rankings/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Victor Butler and Martellus Bennett over Dez Bryant? Orlando Scandrick...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Believe it or not, the Dallas Cowboys are going to see a dramatic downgrade at guard with the loss of Montrae Holland to a torn biceps.  I have been critical of Holland in the past, providing him with a C+ grade in my <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/01/grading-the-boys-in-2010-part-vii-offensive-line/" target="_blank">2010 Offensive Line Grades</a></strong>.  Holland is not an incredible athlete and can appear slow-footed at times, often struggling with quick defensive tackles.  Nonetheless, he outplayed every Cowboys offensive linemen not named Tyron Smith in 2011.  Here is why. . .

Holland participated in 641 snaps this season, 361 of which were in pass protection.  He yielded eight pressures, one hit and two sacks in those snaps, good for a pressure rate of 2.21%.  While not at an elite level, that rate is still quite good.  As a comparison, right guard Kyle Kosier has a pressure rate of 2.85% this season.  That falls right in line with his pressure rate of 2.82% from 2010, providing a statistically significant sample size.  You can see the overall 2010 numbers below.

[caption id="attachment_8652" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="  "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-8652" title="2010 OL Pass Pro" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1-300x192.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="192" /></a>[/caption]

Many of you know I often praise Kosier's pass protection ability, and Holland has been superior to the veteran in 2011.  To get a broader sense of Holland's 2011 success, I took a look at the numbers of some of the top-graded guards (and middle tier guards) on <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>.

[caption id="attachment_9372" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9372" title="Guard Pressure Rates 2011" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011-300x158.png" alt="" width="300" height="158" /></a>[/caption]

You can see Holland's pressure rate, although not elite, was well above-average.  The #32 and #33 ranked guards at PFF surrendered pressure rates up to 46% higher than Holland's.  On top of that, I would grade Holland as the Cowboys' second-best run blocker all season if I was turning in my grades today.  I would provide him with a 'B' in both run blocking and pass protection, and that run blocking grade will undoubtedly be higher than all non-rookie offensive linemen in Big D.

Whether Derrick Dockery or Kevin Kowalski replaces Holland, the Cowboys will see a decline in production.  Holland was having a really strong 2011 campaign. . .and one which was being overlooked even by me.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking Cowboys&#8217; Improvements Over Last Decade</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using EPA to track the historic performance of the Dallas Cowboys


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/rob-ryans-defensive-fronts-the-46-psycho-and-cloud/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing Rob Ryan's defensive fronts, including the "46," "Psycho," and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/03/rob-ryans-zone-blitzes-how-teams-attack-fire-zones-and-how-dallas-can-respond/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>The title says it all....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/11/predictability-remains-in-jason-garretts-play-calling/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling'>Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling</a> <small>Analyzing predictability within Jason Garrett's play-calling and how the Cowboys...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Over at <strong><a href="http://wp.advancednflstats.com/yearstatvisualization.php" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a></strong>, a new feature has taken the world (my world) by storm.  If you click on the link, you can see the offensive and defensive "Expected Points Added" (a metric used to grade each play of a football game--a touchdown obviously has an EPA of six, while a 1st and Goal at the one-yard line is very close that number).  By tracking EPA, you can determine which teams are playing well, even if it is not reflected in their record, and which have simply been lucky.  For us here at DCT, we can take a look at the improvements of the Cowboys over the past decade.  Click on the link above to check out the graphs, or just scroll below.

[caption id="attachment_9304" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9304" title="DAL EPA per game" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-300x216.png" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a>[/caption]

In the first graph, you can see the Cowboys' historic offensive performance as compared to their defensive efficiency.  A few notes:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Since Jason Garrett has taken over as the offensive coordinator, the Cowboys have had well above-average offensive efficiency in every year except for 2008. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Their best season over the last decade, as you might guess, was in 2007.  This season has fallen right in line with 2006 and 2009. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Somewhat surprisingly, the best defenses in Dallas were in the first part of the 2000s.  Since Garrett has been in town, the Cowboys have been below-average on defense, in terms of EPA, every year.</strong></li>
</ul>
[caption id="attachment_9305" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9305" title="DAL EPA per game offense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense-300x105.png" alt="" width="300" height="105" /></a>[/caption]

Above, you can track the Cowboys' offensive improvements over the last 10+ years.  The most important aspect of this graph, in my view, is the fact that offensive performance is leveling out under Garrett.  Yes, the offense has been really solid during Garrett's tenure, but we see the team was moving in that direction since 2002.  There are two ways to look at this. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>The first is that Garrett is overrated as an offensive coordinator because the offense improved for multiple years since 2002 and their play has been stagnant since Garrett took over.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The other way to view the graph is that the Cowboys were bound to improve since their horrible 2002 campaign, and Garrett's ability to keep the offense around the 5.0 EPA/G mark is a testament to his ability. </strong></li>
</ul>
I think we are seeing more of the second explanation than the first.  If the Cowboys were consistently ranked No. 1 in offense each year, we wouldn't say Garrett has shown an inability to improve as a coordinator.  When teams are playing at either a very high or very low level, we are sure to see their play regress to the mean.  This is one reason why it should be a coach's dream to take over a 1-15 team.  Even if the coach does absolutely nothing right, the team will likely win more games the following season, and the coach will be viewed as "improving" his squad.  The fact that the offensive EPA has "leveled out" with Garrett here is a good thing.

Onto the defense. . .

[caption id="attachment_9306" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9306" title="DAL EPA per game defense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense-300x100.png" alt="" width="300" height="100" /></a>[/caption]

This is where the Cowboys need to improve to become a Championship-caliber football team.  Still, the "decline" in defensive production since the early part of the decade is not as drastic as it seems.  The Cowboys have become a far better offensive football team over the last five years because they have been able to throw the ball well.  In the early part of the 2000s, that wasn't the case.  The team opted to shorten games under head coach Bill Parcells, and that resulted in a superior EPA/G as compared to the current defense.

It is not the job of a coach to maximize offensive or defensive EPA, however, but rather to create the largest gap between their team and the opposition.  EPA is not an efficiency stat as we are using it here, so the "superior" EPA/G displayed by the early-2000s Cowboys does not <em>necessarily </em>represent a better defensive football team.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Film Obervations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14 loss to the Giants


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/assessing-football-strategy-is-running-the-football-often-necessary/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing the merits of short kickoffs, rushing the ball often,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/another-epic-collapse-thoughts-on-cowboys-week-14-loss-to-giants/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants'>Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants</a> <small>Why the Cowboys should have let the Giants score late,...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

One of my favorite things to do when I watch the Cowboys' games at home is track the team's win probability throughout the night using <a href="http://live.advancednflstats.com/index.php?gameid1=2011121113" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>' win probability charts.  Using a model which takes the down-and-distance, score, and time into account, ANS is able to determine the probability of a team winning a game at any point in time.  This information doesn't stem from estimates, but rather years of NFL data.

It is always fascinating to see how certain plays can influence a team's chances of winning.  Punts, for example, often result in a fairly significant drop in win probability because giving away possession is generally detrimental to a team.  Near the beginning of games, it takes a huge play to swing win probability in a major way.  A 4th and Goal defensive stop while up six points with 45 minutes to play might result in a big bump in win probability, but that same play would be much larger--perhaps from around 50% to 100%--if the play was the final one of the game.

Using the graph from Sunday night's game, I thought it would be fun to take a look at which plays affected the Cowboys' win probability most significantly.  Below, you can see the chart, along with 10 plays (or short sequences) which I have labeled as the most important. . .

[caption id="attachment_9270" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="CLICK TO ENLARGE "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9270 " title="Cowboys Giants Week 14 Win Probability" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability-300x191.png" alt="" width="300" height="191" /></a>[/caption]

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 1: 64-yard pass to Hakeem Nicks on 3rd and 7 at NYG 32; 53:44 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP (win probability) drops from 42 to 25 (-17%)</strong></li>
</ul>
A 17% drop in win probability in the middle of the first quarter is a big one.  This wouldn't have been much higher even if Nicks scored.  Poor coverage by Alan Ball.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 2: 26-yard gain by Felix Jones on 1st and 10 at NYG 42; 48:19 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 42 to 52 (+10%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The touchdown pass to John Phillips put Dallas on top, but Jones and a subsequent defensive holding penalty put the 'Boys in position to score.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 3: Felix Jones fumbles on 1st and 10 and ball recovered by NYG at DAL 14; 31:38 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 57 to 38 (-19%)</strong></li>
</ul>
This had the potential to be devastating to Dallas but they made the best of the situation by holding New York to a field goal and kicking one of their own before halftime.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 4: 47-yard touchdown pass to Mario Manningham on 3rd and 5 at DAL 47; 19:39 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 70 to 45 (-25%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Yielding a 47-yard score on a crucial 3rd down due to a broken coverage is heartbreaking.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 5: 74-yard pass to Laurent Robinson on 3rd and 10 at DAL 20; 13:17 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 38 to 66 (+28%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Other than the blocked field goal to end the game, this pass to Robinson was the most important one of the contest for Dallas.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 6: 15-yard completion to Mario Manningham on 4th and 3 at DAL 37; 8:24 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 78 to 56 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Here, you can see how game situation affects win probability.  The pass was only 15 yards long, but it came on a crucial 4th and 3 with just over eight minutes left to play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 7: Sean Lee interception on 3rd and 9 at DAL 21; 6:50 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 62 to 89 (+27%)</strong></li>
</ul>
I actually thought this would be more valuable to Dallas, but the fact that it came on a difficult 3rd and 9 (when New York's chances of converting were low) likely affected the jump in WP.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 8: Cowboys' three-and-out; 2:20 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 88 to 67 (-21%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Romo's infamous incompletion to Austin hurt Dallas in a big way.  If you assume Romo hits that pass 90% of the time and Dallas' wins 99% of games following a completion, the actual dip in WP would be closer to -31%.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 9: Holding on Abram Elam and 18-yard completion to Jake Ballard on 1st and 10 at DAL 19; 1:21 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 49 to 27 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The holding penalty on Elam has been overlooked.  DeMarcus Ware's offside penalty was also costly, but the full extent of it isn't factored into the WP chart because the errant snap and loss by the Giants isn't reflected in the play-by-play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 10: Blocked FG; 0:06 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 44 to &lt;1 (-43%)</strong></li>
</ul>
And the Cowboys' playoff chances drop from potentially around 90% with a win to now around 40% .

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Watch (Game Preview)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-review-romo-at-fault/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Thoughts on the Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with the New...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/cowboys-must-capitalize-on-takeaways/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why the Cowboys must capitalize when they force turnovers, and...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it (everyone, I'm assuming), I had an article published on The New York Times' football blog <em>The Fifth Down </em>titled <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/keys-to-defeating-dallas-from-a-cowboys-writer/" target="_blank">Keys to Defeating Dallas, From a Cowboys Writer</a></strong>.  You can (and should) click on the link to read it.

Before I receive the inevitable backlash for writing such blasphemous content, let me point out that this article is not much different than my traditional "DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas" weekly post.  Instead of explaining what Dallas needs to do for a win, however, I simply flipped the script.  "Protect Doug Free" would have been sound advice for Dallas this week, and you will find a corresponding "Attack Doug Free" bullet point in my New York Times piece.

You can find all of my thoughts on the Week 14 matchup in that post.  Here, I wanted to take a look at the broader picture, assessing both the Cowboys' and Giants' odds of making the playoffs after the contest.  There are a number of ways to do that.  In this article, I will conduct a schedule analysis, estimating the odds of each team winning their remaining games and determining how that relates to the subsequent importance of this particular matchup for each squad.

In the beginning of the season, the importance of the strength of a team's schedule is very overblown, and for a variety of reasons.  First, when comparing the schedules of two division opponents, the 14 games which are not head-to-head contain just two dissimilarities, i.e. the Giants and Cowboys had just two opponents which differed.  Secondly, the constant talent flux in the NFL makes preseason predictions in regards to a team's strength of schedule almost useless.  Who wold have thought the Raiders, Bengals, Bills, Lions, etc. would not be "easy wins" in 2011?  Lastly, the overall strength of a schedule tends to even out over the course of a 16-game season.  Simply put, preseason strength of schedule sucks as a method by which to analyze a team's playoff hopes.

By Week 14, however, a team's remaining schedule has a huge influence in their odds of making the playoffs.  Over the course of four games, it is certainly possible to have three or four strong/weak opponents, meaning the schedule doesn't necessarily have time to "even out."  Plus, we already know the relative strength of each NFL team, so estimating each team's win probability for a single game is far easier.

With all of that said, let's take a look at the Giants' and Cowboys' remaining schedules, along with the probability they win each game. . .

[caption id="attachment_9257" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9257" title="Dallas Cowboys New York Giants 2011 WP" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP-300x164.png" alt="" width="300" height="164" /></a>[/caption]

While the probabilities I used are "just" estimates, they are well-researched, solid estimates using advanced statistics gathered from <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/team-rankings-week-fourteen.html" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>.  Using their Generic Win Probability (the odds a team will win a game against a league-average opponent at a neutral site), we can estimate the chances of Dallas and New York winning each remaining game by combining the teams' GWP and factoring in home field advantage.  Thus, while I am "guessing" the odds of wins for the teams in their remaining contests, those probabilities are likely not too far from reality.

If we give each team a win total that directly correlates with their probabilities, i.e. the Cowboys' 54% chance of winning this week's matchup equates to ".54 wins," you can see the Cowboys' theoretical win total for the rest of the 2011 season is 2.37, while the Giants' is 2.40.  That difference is obviously not statistically significant, meaning the small errors which are undoubtedly contained within my win probability projections are surely enough to "make up for" this difference.

In other words, the Cowboys and Giants can be expected to win the same number of games moving forward.  Note that this conclusion does not mean the teams <em>will</em> win the same number of games, but rather that their chances of doing so are the most likely of all possible outcomes.

So what does this all mean for their playoff chances?  The incredible similarity between the teams and their win probability moving forward means that each's respective chances of making the playoffs, even after we factor in the schedule, are roughly the same as if they were both of league-average quality.

Think of it this way: if a team of the same quality of the Colts was 7-5 (like Dallas) and one with a talent level comparable to that of Green Bay was 6-6 (like New York), we'd still expect Green Bay's odds of making the playoffs to be greater due to their far higher win probability in each game.  The role of chance in that situation is less powerful than in the case of the 'Boys and G-Men.

In the latter comparison, we have two teams whose win probabilities for the remainder of the season are roughly equal.  This means that the chances of the Giants making the playoffs, taking their one-game deficit into account, are roughly the same as if we flipped a coin to determine the outcome of each contest.  Perform 10,000 coin flip simulations to allow the numbers to regress to the mean, and you will be left with each team's playoff chances.

Luckily, we have computers which can simulate seasons, so we don't need to waste time flipping a coin.  Over at <a href="http://files.nfl-forecast.com/archives/120" target="_blank">NFL-Forecast.com</a>, they have determined each team's chances of making the playoffs based on thousands of simulations with the GWP provided by Advanced NFL Stats.  If you head over there, you will see the odds of Dallas winning the NFC East are around 64%, with their overall playoff chances adding up to nearly 69% (meaning there is little chance they earn a Wild Card spot).  The Giants' odds are 35% to win the division and 36% to make the playoffs.

In terms of particular scenarios, the Cowboys will win the division if they beat the Giants in both of the clubs' remaining games.  If the Giants perform the same task, they will win the division as long as they do not lose both of their other two games <em>or</em> the Cowboys do not win both of their other games.  Simply put, if one squad wins both head-to-head games, they are effectively the NFC East champs.

If the more probable splitting of head-to-head games occurs, the Cowboys are in with one more win.  Let me break it down for you.  If the teams split and the Cowboys lose to Philly and beat Tampa Bay, for example, they would finish 9-7 and possess the same record as the Giants if they beat both the Redskins and Jets. Then, intricate tiebreakers would come into play.  As shown on <a href="http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures" target="_blank">NFL.com</a>, those are:
<ol>
	<li>Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference</li>
</ol>
The first tiebreaker would obviously end in a tie following a split.  If the Cowboys lose to either the Eagles and Bucs (and the Giants win against the 'Skins and Jets), the teams would finish 9-7 and both have a division record of 3-3, meaning the third tiebreaker would be a factor.  In common games (all but two, remember), the Giants and Cowboys would again be tied at 9-5 (including their head-to-head split).  Thus, the <em>fourth</em> tiebreaker is needed.  Here, the Cowboys have the advantage, as they will have a superior conference record following a split, no matter how the other games shake out.

Let's recap. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are in the playoffs.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Giants sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are almost assuredly in the playoffs.  They would miss out if they lose both remaining games and the Cowboys win both.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the teams split, the Cowboys are in if they win one of their other games.  If the Cowboys lose both of those games, the Giants are in if they win both of their remaining contests.</strong></li>
</ul>
For Dallas, all of the math equates to one simple conclusion: win this week, and you will almost certainly be NFC East champs.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Jason Garrett&#8217;s Late-Game Clock Management</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Jason Garrett deserves even more blame than he is receiving for his late-game clock management 


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/why-jason-garrett-was-wrong-to-run-late-vs-new-england/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why calling three straight runs in the fourth quarter against...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command'>Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command</a> <small>The title is self-explanatory. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/more-on-jason-garretts-decision-to-run-late-vs-pats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Responding to some reader comments on Jason Garrett's late-game play-calling...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it, I published a rather <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/">harsh criticism of Jason Garrett</a></strong> last night, explaining why his lack of courage is a hindrance to the Dallas Cowboys.  As long as Garrett is punting on 4th and 1 at the opponent's 35-yard line or displaying atrocious (if there was a word that was worse, I would us that) clock management skills, this team will cease to capitalize on their potential.

After time to contemplate the value of his decision to not call a timeout late in the fourth quarter of Sunday's loss, Garrett must surely see the error of his ways, right?  Nope.  <a href="http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/_/id/7317155/dallas-cowboys-jason-garrett-explains-late-game-clock-management-loss-arizona-cardinals" target="_blank">Said Garrett</a>:
<blockquote>We very well could have taken a timeout there. We felt like we were in field-goal range. We have yard lines that we use as guidelines before the game. We felt like we were in range at that point.  Tony had them on the line of scrimmage quickly, so we went ahead and clocked it and used that as a timeout. You see so many situations where you have negative plays in those situations. We felt like we were in (Dan Bailey's) range to give him a chance to kick the game-winner. . .We felt pretty good about where we were. Once you get to that 30-yard line we felt like that was a pretty good opportunity for us.</blockquote>
You cannot be serious, Jason.  There were 23 seconds left on the clock when the Cowboys obtained a first down at the Cardinals' 31-yard line, so Garrett's insinuation that the offense clocked the ball "quickly" is erroneous.  On top of that, spiking the ball "as a timeout" is the entire reason no one in their right mind can understand what was going through your own yesterday.

With two timeouts in hand, how in the world do you not use one with 23 seconds on the clock?  Even if you decide you do not want to try to advance the ball down the field, why not at least give yourself the option?  If you (mistakenly) want to settle for a 49-yard field goal attempt, why not run Romo to the middle of the field, let the clock run down, then attempt the field goal with your kicker in a better spot?

Of course, the no-brainer coaching decision is to immediately call timeout and work harder to get the ball downfield.  Instead, Garrett coached scared, disregarding the numbers in favor of not risking a big loss.  But what are "the numbers"?  Let's see. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>On average, a kicker has a <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/11/just-for-kicks.html" target="_blank">65% chance of converting</a> a 49-yard field goal try.
</strong></li>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys gained six more yards, those odds increase to 75%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys had passed the football, there chances of giving up a sack (based on season averages) were 4.0%.  In reality, they were lower because this wasn't a "normal" game situation and Romo would be more willing to throw the ball away at the first sign of trouble than on, say, a 1st and 10 in the first quarter.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>A loss of six yards would equate to a field goal try on which kickers have displayed around 50% accuracy. </strong></li>
</ul>
For Garrett's decision to let the clock tick down to be correct, we would have to assume the Cowboys' offense has less than a 6% chance of gaining six yards on a passing play.  Anyone think that is the case?  Me neither.

One of the major mistakes Garrett made was in his binary thinking regarding field goals.  Brian Burke of Advanced NFL Stats<a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/unicorns-tooth-fairy-cowboys-and-field.html" target="_blank"> pointed that out</a>, discussing Garrett's black-and-white ideas:
<blockquote>Also, note Garrett's conception of "field goal range." He has a yard line established before the game. That kind of thinking assumes a yes-or-no, black-and-white idea of a field goal attempt. Either you're in range or you're not. If we're in "range", and the kicker misses, well, that's his fault. This is a failure to think in probabilistic terms.</blockquote>
The sort of false dichotomy Garrett displayed with his thinking shows he either does not understand statistics at a fundamental level, or he understands them and coaches to limit the blame which could be placed upon him after defeat, instead exposing his players to it.  I think it is the latter.  Unfortunately for Dallas, cowards don't win Super Bowls.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tony Romo Directional Passing: Why Dallas Should Throw Deep More Often</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl Nicks will be the top free agent guard on the market this offseason.  Should Dallas jump on him?


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think'>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</a> <small>Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats'>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</a> <small>Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In the past week or so, I have written extensively on the Cowboys' offensive line.  In my last post (a look at some <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/">interesting offensive statistics</a></strong> from 2011), I hit you with these numbers:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn’t start in 2012, although he probably will.</strong></li>
</ul>
It is pretty clear the interior line is in disarray in Dallas, and something needs to be done to fix it.  I suggested <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-where-should-doug-free-play/">moving Doug Free to right guard</a></strong> and drafting a right tackle in the first round (with Tyron Smith obviously kicking to the left side).  There are some pros and cons to that plan, but I like it because it instantly upgrades two spots.

Others have suggested the Cowboys might make a run at impending <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4689477/could-cowboys-make-play-for-carl-nicks?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">free agent guard Carl Nicks</a>, though.  Although Jerry Jones has refrained from signing big-money free agents since Jason Garrett has taken over as head coach, this is one I actually believe the 'Boys should jump all over.  Here's why.

Nicks will command a hefty contract, but guards are continually underpaid in the NFL.  He won't garner nearly as much money as an elite left tackle, but his impact (for Dallas, especially) isn't that much less than his tackle counterpart.  We saw how much a weak interior line can affect an offense in 2011.  Don't let it happen again in 2012.

Nicks was the No. 2 ranked guard by <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>, yielding only eight pressures all season.  He had the second-highest pass blocking efficiency in the NFL, allowing a sack, hit or pressure on just 1.4% of pass plays.  Nicks is a dominant run blocker as well.  Saints running backs averaged a ridiculous 5.96 yards-per-carry when Nicks was at the point-of-attack this season.  Compare those numbers with the Cowboys' interior linemen (above).  Dallas backs averaged less than four yards per carry when running behind Holland in 2011, and he's a player whose run blocking I praised as solid.

Personally, I don't think the acquisition of Nicks means the team should automatically forget about switching Free's position.  A tackle-to-guard transition might not seem as appealing with Nicks in town, but an offensive line of Smith, Nicks, Kosier (who can play center), Free, and a rookie right tackle looks pretty damn good to me.  Throw in Holland and Phil Costa as backups, and you're all set.

Either way, Nicks is a player who the Cowboys should seriously consider.  He will demand a pretty penny, but guards are repeatedly undervalued.  He's a player on whom to break the bank this offseason.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys Times &#187; Film Study/Stat Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/film-studystats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com</link>
	<description>Unrivaled Dallas Cowboys Info 24/7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should the Cowboys Make a Run at G Carl Nicks?</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl Nicks will be the top free agent guard on the market this offseason.  Should Dallas jump on him?


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think'>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</a> <small>Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats'>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</a> <small>Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In the past week or so, I have written extensively on the Cowboys' offensive line.  In my last post (a look at some <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/">interesting offensive statistics</a></strong> from 2011), I hit you with these numbers:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn’t start in 2012, although he probably will.</strong></li>
</ul>
It is pretty clear the interior line is in disarray in Dallas, and something needs to be done to fix it.  I suggested <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-where-should-doug-free-play/">moving Doug Free to right guard</a></strong> and drafting a right tackle in the first round (with Tyron Smith obviously kicking to the left side).  There are some pros and cons to that plan, but I like it because it instantly upgrades two spots.

Others have suggested the Cowboys might make a run at impending <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4689477/could-cowboys-make-play-for-carl-nicks?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">free agent guard Carl Nicks</a>, though.  Although Jerry Jones has refrained from signing big-money free agents since Jason Garrett has taken over as head coach, this is one I actually believe the 'Boys should jump all over.  Here's why.

Nicks will command a hefty contract, but guards are continually underpaid in the NFL.  He won't garner nearly as much money as an elite left tackle, but his impact (for Dallas, especially) isn't that much less than his tackle counterpart.  We saw how much a weak interior line can affect an offense in 2011.  Don't let it happen again in 2012.

Nicks was the No. 2 ranked guard by <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>, yielding only eight pressures all season.  He had the second-highest pass blocking efficiency in the NFL, allowing a sack, hit or pressure on just 1.4% of pass plays.  Nicks is a dominant run blocker as well.  Saints running backs averaged a ridiculous 5.96 yards-per-carry when Nicks was at the point-of-attack this season.  Compare those numbers with the Cowboys' interior linemen (above).  Dallas backs averaged less than four yards per carry when running behind Holland in 2011, and he's a player whose run blocking I praised as solid.

Personally, I don't think the acquisition of Nicks means the team should automatically forget about switching Free's position.  A tackle-to-guard transition might not seem as appealing with Nicks in town, but an offensive line of Smith, Nicks, Kosier (who can play center), Free, and a rookie right tackle looks pretty damn good to me.  Throw in Holland and Phil Costa as backups, and you're all set.

Either way, Nicks is a player who the Cowboys should seriously consider.  He will demand a pretty penny, but guards are repeatedly undervalued.  He's a player on whom to break the bank this offseason.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is an elite quarterback, the Cowboys' running backs need to improve in pass pro, Montrae Holland played very well in 2011, and Phil Costa shouldn't start in 2012


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/how-dallas-cowboys-player-rankings-should-affect-2011-draft-prep/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Player and position rankings for the Dallas Cowboys in 2010,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-skill-position-grades-through-week-7/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7'>Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7</a> <small>Grades for Tony Romo, DeMarco Murray, Miles Austin and others...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

I am going to begin my 2012 Draft coverage early this year, and you can expect it to be superb. . .<strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/draft/">as per usual</a></strong>.  Between those articles you can also expect to find stat analysis of the Cowboys 2011 season.  Below, I have pasted some interesting numbers from both <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/signature.php?tab=signature&amp;pos=qbr" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a> and my own Excel spreadsheets.  Similar defensive statistics to come.

<strong style="color: #000080;">Tony Romo</strong>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo finished the season fourth in the NFL in passer rating at 102.5, behind only Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees and Tom Brady.  That includes a 104.4 rating in the fourth quarter. . .not bad for a "choke artist." </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Taking away drops, spikes and throw aways, Romo's completion percentage was 73.5%. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>On deep passes of 20+ yards, Romo completed 54.8% of his attempts.  That was second in the league to Aaron Rodgers, but only 11.9% of Romo's passes traveled that long--good for only 13th in the league.  He threw 13 touchdowns and only two picks on deep throws.  I've been saying for years the <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tony-romo-directional-passing-why-dallas-should-throw-deep-more-often/">Cowboys would benefit immensely from more deep passes</a>. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo was under pressure on 30.7% of dropbacks, which was 13th highest in league, but completed 56.7% of his passes in these situations.  That was second-best in the NFL to only Drew Brees<span style="color: #000080;">.</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Dez Bryant, Miles Austin and Laurent Robinson</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys quarterbacks had a 110.8 passer rating when throwing to Dez Bryant, which was the 16th-highest of any receiver in the NFL.  Romo threw three of his interceptions when targeting Bryant.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>I have seen some criticisms of Miles Austin lately, even from "expert" Dallas-area writers.  Don't listen to it.  Austin's only problem has been staying healthy, as Romo posted a 117.8 rating when throwing to Austin, including zero interceptions.  That rating is good for 11th among all receivers.  Austin is an elite wide receiver who will have a monster 2012 season if he stays on the field.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Puzzling to me are Austin's drops.  After a 2010 season in which he struggled with dropping passes, Austin let four more get through his hands this season.  That isn't an enormous amount, but it was 8.5% of catchable passes and good for just 37th in the NFL.  I think this is a small sample size at work, though, as just one less drop would shoot Austin up to 23rd.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Meanwhile, Bryant tallied only one drop all season--second-best in the NFL of any receiver who played 25% of his team's snaps.  Only Golden Tate caught every pass possible.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Laurent Robinson caught 58.8% of deep passes (20+ yards) thrown his way, good for third in NFL.  Austin was 10th at 50.0%, and Bryant 29th at 36.8%.  These numbers are misleading, as Robinson is very rarely the first read on plays.  If he is thrown to, chances are he's fairly open.  Bryant gets balls in double-coverage, and so we'd expect his deep catch rate to be lower.  Larry Fitzgerald, for example, was just 24th in the NFL at 41.2%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Robinson tallied 2.18 yards per route--the top number on the Cowboys.</strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones were both solid at avoiding defenders in 2011, tallying 3.01 and 2.98 yards-after-contact/attempt.  Those rates were 10th and 11th in the league.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray had 36.8% of his yardage come on runs of 15+ yards, which was the 12th-highest rate in the NFL.  Jones was 31st at 26.4%.  Again, this stat can be misleading.  While you always want big plays, a really high "big run rate" can be an indicator that a running back will regress to the mean the following season, rushing for fewer big plays and seeing a decrease in both total yards and yards per attempt.  Murray and Jones are both breakaway players, and I'd expect both of them to be around 35% in any given season.  As an example of how much these numbers can fluctuate, consider that Jones saw 44.0% of his yards come on big plays in 2009, compared to just 15.3% last season.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones were 24th and 26th, respectively, in catch rate at 89.7% and 89.2%</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones both need to improve in pass protection.  Jones allowed a pressure, hit or sack on 6.3% of snaps he was in pass pro.  This was just the 41st-best mark in the NFL.  Murray's 9.7% number came in at 62nd in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Jason Witten dropped 3.61% of balls thrown his way (three total), good for 10th in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>13.5% of Witten's snaps came in the slot.  That was just the 17th-highest percentage for tight ends, and the rate was well behind the top 10 (all of whom played 25+% snaps in slot). </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten was 12th in yards per route at 1.69.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten blocked on only 9.4% of pass plays, well below his rate in past seasons.  He was 18th in the NFL with 3.9% of snaps resulting in a pressure, hit or sack.  Martellus Bennett was 17th, with 3.8% of his snaps resulting in some sort of pressure.  It confirms the notion that Witten and Bennett are similar in pass protection (although Bennett is far superior as a run blocker).  Bennett blocked on 20.1% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Offensive Line</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The entire offensive line was 14th overall in pass blocking efficiency, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on 18.5% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Tyron Smith was the league's 14th most efficient tackle in terms of pass protection, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on just 4.0% of pass plays.  Free was 48th with 6.3%.  He also allowed 10 sacks, which was sixth-worst in the NFL. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn't start in 2012, although he probably will. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Bill Nagy allowed pressure on 4.1% of pass plays, good for 41st in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyzing the Top Tier Offensive Tackles in 2012 NFL Draft</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scouting reports on Matt Kalil, Jonathan Martin and Riley Reiff


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/dallas-cowboys-draft-usc-ot-tyron-smith-no-9-overall/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Initial reactions to the Cowboys selecting USC offensive tackle Tyron...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-potential-draft-pick-in-2011-anthony-castonzo-ot-boston-college/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Scouting report on Boston College offensive tackle Anthony Castonzo, including...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Justin Shoemaker

<em>Editor's Note: A few days ago, we had an article published in the Dallas Observer which argued <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2012/01/cowboys-giants-recap.php" target="_blank">why Doug Free should be moved to guard</a></strong>.  In addition to his contract being a sunk cost and rookie right tackle Tyron Smith being ready to make the switch to the left side, there will also (likely) be a top tier offensive tackle available for Dallas with the 14th overall selection.  While the team needs all the help it can get on defense, selecting an OT in the first round would instantly upgrade two positions.  DCT contributor Justin Shoemaker took some time to analyze the top three offensive tackle prospects in the 2012 NFL Draft.</em>

<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Matt Kalil (USC)</strong></span>

- sole reason Tyron Smith played right tackle for USC

-incredible footwork and very nimble for a  6’7'' guy. . .has the size to dominate in the power running game but the quickness to get out on counters, tosses and screens

- very comparable to Joe Thomas and Jake Long. . .has tools to be All-Pro

- unless Dallas moves up, he will be out of reach (likely No. 2 overall)

- Note from Jonathan: When I began studying Tyron Smith last year, I just assumed he was a left tackle.  After a couple plays I realized the player I was reviewing was white, so I had a pretty good idea I wasn't watching Smith.  I kept watching, though, because that player (Kalil) was absolutely dominant.  I can say I wholeheartedly believe Kalil is the top offensive tackle prospect I have seen. . .ever.  He's superior to Thomas and Long, in my opinions, and he will be an All-Pro for a decade.

<strong><span style="color: #a93022;">Jonathan Martin (Stanford)</span></strong>

- has protected Andrew Luck, but may have looked better than reality due to Luck's quick release (in much the same way Peyton Manning has made his average line look elite)

- surprisingly better in run blocking than pass protection

- versatile enough to play RT or LT; can set the edge, but still has agility to get to second level

- can play aggressively and with an attitude at times, but then becomes defensive and gives up too much ground to the pass rusher.

- seems to struggle when matched up on nine-technique players or 3-4 outside linebackers; thrives against "power" seven or five-technique rushers

- still has plenty of room to improve technique; would be instant upgrade over Free, even at right tackle

<span style="color: #ffcc00;"><strong>Riley Reiff (Iowa)</strong></span>

-typical Big 10 lineman, which means everyone loves the run blocking ability. . .will have more knocks on his pass protection

-can get a little stiff and awkward in both run blocking and pass protection; not a natural athlete like Kalil or Martin

-great awareness of the pocket and pushing the defender beyond it; will let defenders rush themselves out of play

-could be beast in various run blocking schemes, but may not fit as well for the Cowboys if they plan to incorporate more "finesse" runs with Murray and Jones

- no quit attitude until the whistle blows, play contagious to teammates (he's a Marc Colombo with skill)

-very much like fellow Hawkeye Bryan Bulaga,

- probably not enough value at No. 14

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 17: How Dallas Can Win the NFC East</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas in Week 17


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup'>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</a> <small>The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In addition to my article for the Times on <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/how-dallas-should-attack-giants-pass-defense/" target="_blank">how Dallas can beat Cover 2 Man Under</a></strong> this weekend in the Meadowlands, I also did a piece for the <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">Dallas Observer</a></strong>.  Head over there to check out my <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas</a>. </strong>Along with more analysis of the coverage which irritated Dallas in Week 14, I add a full game plan for the 'Boys.  Here are some of the highlights:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Don't blitz often.  Eli Manning's passer rating against the blitz is very comparable to that when four or less defenders rush him, but the Cowboys do not have the talent in the secondary to deal with a blitz that fails.  The team should be in the business of playing aggressively while still allowing for a chance to win the game late, and yielding quick scores due to unsuccessful blitz attempts won't help.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The 'Boys should mimic the Giants' Week 14 game plan by playing a lot of Cover 2 Man Under.  By keeping everything in front of them, the defense can maximize their chances of halting Hakeem Nicks and Victor Cruz and force either a tight end or a running back to beat them.  Although Brandon Jacobs wore down Dallas in the teams' last meeting, Ahmad Bradshaw is the more likely of the two to give Dallas fits this week.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Giants pass a lot out of double-tight formations, so the Cowboys cannot sell out to defend the run when they see the look.  The G-Men used a double-tight set 34 times in Week 14, so the 'Boys better be ready for it.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Cowboys, on the other hand, do tip their play calls via their formation, personnel package, or down-and-distance.  Jason Garrett could benefit from being a bit less predictable this week.  Garrett's predictability could be utilized to get the ball downfield with play action. But since 2009, Dallas quarterbacks have thrown for 20-plus yards on only 8.7 percent of play-action passes. And in two-plus years of passes, Garrett has called a play-action pass only eight times with 1-4 yards-to-go for a first down -- the situations when faking a run would actually work. Instead, he's called for a play-action look on 11 plays with 20-plus yards-to-go, when showing a running play is either an obvious decoy or hopeless.</strong></li>
</ul>
For additional analysis, <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">head over to the Observer</a></strong> and leave your comments there.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Grading the 'Boys"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the remainder of the season


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-defensive-linelinebackers/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Sean Lee has played better than Jay Ratliff, and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-times-final-2010-player-position-rankings/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Victor Butler and Martellus Bennett over Dez Bryant? Orlando Scandrick...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Believe it or not, the Dallas Cowboys are going to see a dramatic downgrade at guard with the loss of Montrae Holland to a torn biceps.  I have been critical of Holland in the past, providing him with a C+ grade in my <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/01/grading-the-boys-in-2010-part-vii-offensive-line/" target="_blank">2010 Offensive Line Grades</a></strong>.  Holland is not an incredible athlete and can appear slow-footed at times, often struggling with quick defensive tackles.  Nonetheless, he outplayed every Cowboys offensive linemen not named Tyron Smith in 2011.  Here is why. . .

Holland participated in 641 snaps this season, 361 of which were in pass protection.  He yielded eight pressures, one hit and two sacks in those snaps, good for a pressure rate of 2.21%.  While not at an elite level, that rate is still quite good.  As a comparison, right guard Kyle Kosier has a pressure rate of 2.85% this season.  That falls right in line with his pressure rate of 2.82% from 2010, providing a statistically significant sample size.  You can see the overall 2010 numbers below.

[caption id="attachment_8652" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="  "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-8652" title="2010 OL Pass Pro" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1-300x192.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="192" /></a>[/caption]

Many of you know I often praise Kosier's pass protection ability, and Holland has been superior to the veteran in 2011.  To get a broader sense of Holland's 2011 success, I took a look at the numbers of some of the top-graded guards (and middle tier guards) on <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>.

[caption id="attachment_9372" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9372" title="Guard Pressure Rates 2011" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011-300x158.png" alt="" width="300" height="158" /></a>[/caption]

You can see Holland's pressure rate, although not elite, was well above-average.  The #32 and #33 ranked guards at PFF surrendered pressure rates up to 46% higher than Holland's.  On top of that, I would grade Holland as the Cowboys' second-best run blocker all season if I was turning in my grades today.  I would provide him with a 'B' in both run blocking and pass protection, and that run blocking grade will undoubtedly be higher than all non-rookie offensive linemen in Big D.

Whether Derrick Dockery or Kevin Kowalski replaces Holland, the Cowboys will see a decline in production.  Holland was having a really strong 2011 campaign. . .and one which was being overlooked even by me.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking Cowboys&#8217; Improvements Over Last Decade</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using EPA to track the historic performance of the Dallas Cowboys


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/rob-ryans-defensive-fronts-the-46-psycho-and-cloud/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing Rob Ryan's defensive fronts, including the "46," "Psycho," and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/03/rob-ryans-zone-blitzes-how-teams-attack-fire-zones-and-how-dallas-can-respond/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>The title says it all....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/11/predictability-remains-in-jason-garretts-play-calling/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling'>Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling</a> <small>Analyzing predictability within Jason Garrett's play-calling and how the Cowboys...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Over at <strong><a href="http://wp.advancednflstats.com/yearstatvisualization.php" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a></strong>, a new feature has taken the world (my world) by storm.  If you click on the link, you can see the offensive and defensive "Expected Points Added" (a metric used to grade each play of a football game--a touchdown obviously has an EPA of six, while a 1st and Goal at the one-yard line is very close that number).  By tracking EPA, you can determine which teams are playing well, even if it is not reflected in their record, and which have simply been lucky.  For us here at DCT, we can take a look at the improvements of the Cowboys over the past decade.  Click on the link above to check out the graphs, or just scroll below.

[caption id="attachment_9304" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9304" title="DAL EPA per game" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-300x216.png" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a>[/caption]

In the first graph, you can see the Cowboys' historic offensive performance as compared to their defensive efficiency.  A few notes:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Since Jason Garrett has taken over as the offensive coordinator, the Cowboys have had well above-average offensive efficiency in every year except for 2008. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Their best season over the last decade, as you might guess, was in 2007.  This season has fallen right in line with 2006 and 2009. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Somewhat surprisingly, the best defenses in Dallas were in the first part of the 2000s.  Since Garrett has been in town, the Cowboys have been below-average on defense, in terms of EPA, every year.</strong></li>
</ul>
[caption id="attachment_9305" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9305" title="DAL EPA per game offense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense-300x105.png" alt="" width="300" height="105" /></a>[/caption]

Above, you can track the Cowboys' offensive improvements over the last 10+ years.  The most important aspect of this graph, in my view, is the fact that offensive performance is leveling out under Garrett.  Yes, the offense has been really solid during Garrett's tenure, but we see the team was moving in that direction since 2002.  There are two ways to look at this. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>The first is that Garrett is overrated as an offensive coordinator because the offense improved for multiple years since 2002 and their play has been stagnant since Garrett took over.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The other way to view the graph is that the Cowboys were bound to improve since their horrible 2002 campaign, and Garrett's ability to keep the offense around the 5.0 EPA/G mark is a testament to his ability. </strong></li>
</ul>
I think we are seeing more of the second explanation than the first.  If the Cowboys were consistently ranked No. 1 in offense each year, we wouldn't say Garrett has shown an inability to improve as a coordinator.  When teams are playing at either a very high or very low level, we are sure to see their play regress to the mean.  This is one reason why it should be a coach's dream to take over a 1-15 team.  Even if the coach does absolutely nothing right, the team will likely win more games the following season, and the coach will be viewed as "improving" his squad.  The fact that the offensive EPA has "leveled out" with Garrett here is a good thing.

Onto the defense. . .

[caption id="attachment_9306" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9306" title="DAL EPA per game defense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense-300x100.png" alt="" width="300" height="100" /></a>[/caption]

This is where the Cowboys need to improve to become a Championship-caliber football team.  Still, the "decline" in defensive production since the early part of the decade is not as drastic as it seems.  The Cowboys have become a far better offensive football team over the last five years because they have been able to throw the ball well.  In the early part of the 2000s, that wasn't the case.  The team opted to shorten games under head coach Bill Parcells, and that resulted in a superior EPA/G as compared to the current defense.

It is not the job of a coach to maximize offensive or defensive EPA, however, but rather to create the largest gap between their team and the opposition.  EPA is not an efficiency stat as we are using it here, so the "superior" EPA/G displayed by the early-2000s Cowboys does not <em>necessarily </em>represent a better defensive football team.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Film Obervations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14 loss to the Giants


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/assessing-football-strategy-is-running-the-football-often-necessary/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing the merits of short kickoffs, rushing the ball often,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/another-epic-collapse-thoughts-on-cowboys-week-14-loss-to-giants/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants'>Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants</a> <small>Why the Cowboys should have let the Giants score late,...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

One of my favorite things to do when I watch the Cowboys' games at home is track the team's win probability throughout the night using <a href="http://live.advancednflstats.com/index.php?gameid1=2011121113" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>' win probability charts.  Using a model which takes the down-and-distance, score, and time into account, ANS is able to determine the probability of a team winning a game at any point in time.  This information doesn't stem from estimates, but rather years of NFL data.

It is always fascinating to see how certain plays can influence a team's chances of winning.  Punts, for example, often result in a fairly significant drop in win probability because giving away possession is generally detrimental to a team.  Near the beginning of games, it takes a huge play to swing win probability in a major way.  A 4th and Goal defensive stop while up six points with 45 minutes to play might result in a big bump in win probability, but that same play would be much larger--perhaps from around 50% to 100%--if the play was the final one of the game.

Using the graph from Sunday night's game, I thought it would be fun to take a look at which plays affected the Cowboys' win probability most significantly.  Below, you can see the chart, along with 10 plays (or short sequences) which I have labeled as the most important. . .

[caption id="attachment_9270" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="CLICK TO ENLARGE "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9270 " title="Cowboys Giants Week 14 Win Probability" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability-300x191.png" alt="" width="300" height="191" /></a>[/caption]

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 1: 64-yard pass to Hakeem Nicks on 3rd and 7 at NYG 32; 53:44 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP (win probability) drops from 42 to 25 (-17%)</strong></li>
</ul>
A 17% drop in win probability in the middle of the first quarter is a big one.  This wouldn't have been much higher even if Nicks scored.  Poor coverage by Alan Ball.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 2: 26-yard gain by Felix Jones on 1st and 10 at NYG 42; 48:19 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 42 to 52 (+10%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The touchdown pass to John Phillips put Dallas on top, but Jones and a subsequent defensive holding penalty put the 'Boys in position to score.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 3: Felix Jones fumbles on 1st and 10 and ball recovered by NYG at DAL 14; 31:38 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 57 to 38 (-19%)</strong></li>
</ul>
This had the potential to be devastating to Dallas but they made the best of the situation by holding New York to a field goal and kicking one of their own before halftime.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 4: 47-yard touchdown pass to Mario Manningham on 3rd and 5 at DAL 47; 19:39 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 70 to 45 (-25%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Yielding a 47-yard score on a crucial 3rd down due to a broken coverage is heartbreaking.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 5: 74-yard pass to Laurent Robinson on 3rd and 10 at DAL 20; 13:17 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 38 to 66 (+28%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Other than the blocked field goal to end the game, this pass to Robinson was the most important one of the contest for Dallas.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 6: 15-yard completion to Mario Manningham on 4th and 3 at DAL 37; 8:24 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 78 to 56 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Here, you can see how game situation affects win probability.  The pass was only 15 yards long, but it came on a crucial 4th and 3 with just over eight minutes left to play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 7: Sean Lee interception on 3rd and 9 at DAL 21; 6:50 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 62 to 89 (+27%)</strong></li>
</ul>
I actually thought this would be more valuable to Dallas, but the fact that it came on a difficult 3rd and 9 (when New York's chances of converting were low) likely affected the jump in WP.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 8: Cowboys' three-and-out; 2:20 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 88 to 67 (-21%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Romo's infamous incompletion to Austin hurt Dallas in a big way.  If you assume Romo hits that pass 90% of the time and Dallas' wins 99% of games following a completion, the actual dip in WP would be closer to -31%.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 9: Holding on Abram Elam and 18-yard completion to Jake Ballard on 1st and 10 at DAL 19; 1:21 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 49 to 27 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The holding penalty on Elam has been overlooked.  DeMarcus Ware's offside penalty was also costly, but the full extent of it isn't factored into the WP chart because the errant snap and loss by the Giants isn't reflected in the play-by-play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 10: Blocked FG; 0:06 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 44 to &lt;1 (-43%)</strong></li>
</ul>
And the Cowboys' playoff chances drop from potentially around 90% with a win to now around 40% .

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Watch (Game Preview)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-review-romo-at-fault/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Thoughts on the Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with the New...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/cowboys-must-capitalize-on-takeaways/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why the Cowboys must capitalize when they force turnovers, and...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it (everyone, I'm assuming), I had an article published on The New York Times' football blog <em>The Fifth Down </em>titled <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/keys-to-defeating-dallas-from-a-cowboys-writer/" target="_blank">Keys to Defeating Dallas, From a Cowboys Writer</a></strong>.  You can (and should) click on the link to read it.

Before I receive the inevitable backlash for writing such blasphemous content, let me point out that this article is not much different than my traditional "DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas" weekly post.  Instead of explaining what Dallas needs to do for a win, however, I simply flipped the script.  "Protect Doug Free" would have been sound advice for Dallas this week, and you will find a corresponding "Attack Doug Free" bullet point in my New York Times piece.

You can find all of my thoughts on the Week 14 matchup in that post.  Here, I wanted to take a look at the broader picture, assessing both the Cowboys' and Giants' odds of making the playoffs after the contest.  There are a number of ways to do that.  In this article, I will conduct a schedule analysis, estimating the odds of each team winning their remaining games and determining how that relates to the subsequent importance of this particular matchup for each squad.

In the beginning of the season, the importance of the strength of a team's schedule is very overblown, and for a variety of reasons.  First, when comparing the schedules of two division opponents, the 14 games which are not head-to-head contain just two dissimilarities, i.e. the Giants and Cowboys had just two opponents which differed.  Secondly, the constant talent flux in the NFL makes preseason predictions in regards to a team's strength of schedule almost useless.  Who wold have thought the Raiders, Bengals, Bills, Lions, etc. would not be "easy wins" in 2011?  Lastly, the overall strength of a schedule tends to even out over the course of a 16-game season.  Simply put, preseason strength of schedule sucks as a method by which to analyze a team's playoff hopes.

By Week 14, however, a team's remaining schedule has a huge influence in their odds of making the playoffs.  Over the course of four games, it is certainly possible to have three or four strong/weak opponents, meaning the schedule doesn't necessarily have time to "even out."  Plus, we already know the relative strength of each NFL team, so estimating each team's win probability for a single game is far easier.

With all of that said, let's take a look at the Giants' and Cowboys' remaining schedules, along with the probability they win each game. . .

[caption id="attachment_9257" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9257" title="Dallas Cowboys New York Giants 2011 WP" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP-300x164.png" alt="" width="300" height="164" /></a>[/caption]

While the probabilities I used are "just" estimates, they are well-researched, solid estimates using advanced statistics gathered from <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/team-rankings-week-fourteen.html" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>.  Using their Generic Win Probability (the odds a team will win a game against a league-average opponent at a neutral site), we can estimate the chances of Dallas and New York winning each remaining game by combining the teams' GWP and factoring in home field advantage.  Thus, while I am "guessing" the odds of wins for the teams in their remaining contests, those probabilities are likely not too far from reality.

If we give each team a win total that directly correlates with their probabilities, i.e. the Cowboys' 54% chance of winning this week's matchup equates to ".54 wins," you can see the Cowboys' theoretical win total for the rest of the 2011 season is 2.37, while the Giants' is 2.40.  That difference is obviously not statistically significant, meaning the small errors which are undoubtedly contained within my win probability projections are surely enough to "make up for" this difference.

In other words, the Cowboys and Giants can be expected to win the same number of games moving forward.  Note that this conclusion does not mean the teams <em>will</em> win the same number of games, but rather that their chances of doing so are the most likely of all possible outcomes.

So what does this all mean for their playoff chances?  The incredible similarity between the teams and their win probability moving forward means that each's respective chances of making the playoffs, even after we factor in the schedule, are roughly the same as if they were both of league-average quality.

Think of it this way: if a team of the same quality of the Colts was 7-5 (like Dallas) and one with a talent level comparable to that of Green Bay was 6-6 (like New York), we'd still expect Green Bay's odds of making the playoffs to be greater due to their far higher win probability in each game.  The role of chance in that situation is less powerful than in the case of the 'Boys and G-Men.

In the latter comparison, we have two teams whose win probabilities for the remainder of the season are roughly equal.  This means that the chances of the Giants making the playoffs, taking their one-game deficit into account, are roughly the same as if we flipped a coin to determine the outcome of each contest.  Perform 10,000 coin flip simulations to allow the numbers to regress to the mean, and you will be left with each team's playoff chances.

Luckily, we have computers which can simulate seasons, so we don't need to waste time flipping a coin.  Over at <a href="http://files.nfl-forecast.com/archives/120" target="_blank">NFL-Forecast.com</a>, they have determined each team's chances of making the playoffs based on thousands of simulations with the GWP provided by Advanced NFL Stats.  If you head over there, you will see the odds of Dallas winning the NFC East are around 64%, with their overall playoff chances adding up to nearly 69% (meaning there is little chance they earn a Wild Card spot).  The Giants' odds are 35% to win the division and 36% to make the playoffs.

In terms of particular scenarios, the Cowboys will win the division if they beat the Giants in both of the clubs' remaining games.  If the Giants perform the same task, they will win the division as long as they do not lose both of their other two games <em>or</em> the Cowboys do not win both of their other games.  Simply put, if one squad wins both head-to-head games, they are effectively the NFC East champs.

If the more probable splitting of head-to-head games occurs, the Cowboys are in with one more win.  Let me break it down for you.  If the teams split and the Cowboys lose to Philly and beat Tampa Bay, for example, they would finish 9-7 and possess the same record as the Giants if they beat both the Redskins and Jets. Then, intricate tiebreakers would come into play.  As shown on <a href="http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures" target="_blank">NFL.com</a>, those are:
<ol>
	<li>Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference</li>
</ol>
The first tiebreaker would obviously end in a tie following a split.  If the Cowboys lose to either the Eagles and Bucs (and the Giants win against the 'Skins and Jets), the teams would finish 9-7 and both have a division record of 3-3, meaning the third tiebreaker would be a factor.  In common games (all but two, remember), the Giants and Cowboys would again be tied at 9-5 (including their head-to-head split).  Thus, the <em>fourth</em> tiebreaker is needed.  Here, the Cowboys have the advantage, as they will have a superior conference record following a split, no matter how the other games shake out.

Let's recap. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are in the playoffs.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Giants sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are almost assuredly in the playoffs.  They would miss out if they lose both remaining games and the Cowboys win both.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the teams split, the Cowboys are in if they win one of their other games.  If the Cowboys lose both of those games, the Giants are in if they win both of their remaining contests.</strong></li>
</ul>
For Dallas, all of the math equates to one simple conclusion: win this week, and you will almost certainly be NFC East champs.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Jason Garrett&#8217;s Late-Game Clock Management</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Jason Garrett deserves even more blame than he is receiving for his late-game clock management 


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/why-jason-garrett-was-wrong-to-run-late-vs-new-england/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why calling three straight runs in the fourth quarter against...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command'>Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command</a> <small>The title is self-explanatory. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/more-on-jason-garretts-decision-to-run-late-vs-pats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Responding to some reader comments on Jason Garrett's late-game play-calling...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it, I published a rather <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/">harsh criticism of Jason Garrett</a></strong> last night, explaining why his lack of courage is a hindrance to the Dallas Cowboys.  As long as Garrett is punting on 4th and 1 at the opponent's 35-yard line or displaying atrocious (if there was a word that was worse, I would us that) clock management skills, this team will cease to capitalize on their potential.

After time to contemplate the value of his decision to not call a timeout late in the fourth quarter of Sunday's loss, Garrett must surely see the error of his ways, right?  Nope.  <a href="http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/_/id/7317155/dallas-cowboys-jason-garrett-explains-late-game-clock-management-loss-arizona-cardinals" target="_blank">Said Garrett</a>:
<blockquote>We very well could have taken a timeout there. We felt like we were in field-goal range. We have yard lines that we use as guidelines before the game. We felt like we were in range at that point.  Tony had them on the line of scrimmage quickly, so we went ahead and clocked it and used that as a timeout. You see so many situations where you have negative plays in those situations. We felt like we were in (Dan Bailey's) range to give him a chance to kick the game-winner. . .We felt pretty good about where we were. Once you get to that 30-yard line we felt like that was a pretty good opportunity for us.</blockquote>
You cannot be serious, Jason.  There were 23 seconds left on the clock when the Cowboys obtained a first down at the Cardinals' 31-yard line, so Garrett's insinuation that the offense clocked the ball "quickly" is erroneous.  On top of that, spiking the ball "as a timeout" is the entire reason no one in their right mind can understand what was going through your own yesterday.

With two timeouts in hand, how in the world do you not use one with 23 seconds on the clock?  Even if you decide you do not want to try to advance the ball down the field, why not at least give yourself the option?  If you (mistakenly) want to settle for a 49-yard field goal attempt, why not run Romo to the middle of the field, let the clock run down, then attempt the field goal with your kicker in a better spot?

Of course, the no-brainer coaching decision is to immediately call timeout and work harder to get the ball downfield.  Instead, Garrett coached scared, disregarding the numbers in favor of not risking a big loss.  But what are "the numbers"?  Let's see. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>On average, a kicker has a <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/11/just-for-kicks.html" target="_blank">65% chance of converting</a> a 49-yard field goal try.
</strong></li>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys gained six more yards, those odds increase to 75%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys had passed the football, there chances of giving up a sack (based on season averages) were 4.0%.  In reality, they were lower because this wasn't a "normal" game situation and Romo would be more willing to throw the ball away at the first sign of trouble than on, say, a 1st and 10 in the first quarter.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>A loss of six yards would equate to a field goal try on which kickers have displayed around 50% accuracy. </strong></li>
</ul>
For Garrett's decision to let the clock tick down to be correct, we would have to assume the Cowboys' offense has less than a 6% chance of gaining six yards on a passing play.  Anyone think that is the case?  Me neither.

One of the major mistakes Garrett made was in his binary thinking regarding field goals.  Brian Burke of Advanced NFL Stats<a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/unicorns-tooth-fairy-cowboys-and-field.html" target="_blank"> pointed that out</a>, discussing Garrett's black-and-white ideas:
<blockquote>Also, note Garrett's conception of "field goal range." He has a yard line established before the game. That kind of thinking assumes a yes-or-no, black-and-white idea of a field goal attempt. Either you're in range or you're not. If we're in "range", and the kicker misses, well, that's his fault. This is a failure to think in probabilistic terms.</blockquote>
The sort of false dichotomy Garrett displayed with his thinking shows he either does not understand statistics at a fundamental level, or he understands them and coaches to limit the blame which could be placed upon him after defeat, instead exposing his players to it.  I think it is the latter.  Unfortunately for Dallas, cowards don't win Super Bowls.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tony Romo Directional Passing: Why Dallas Should Throw Deep More Often</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is an elite quarterback, the Cowboys' running backs need to improve in pass pro, Montrae Holland played very well in 2011, and Phil Costa shouldn't start in 2012


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/how-dallas-cowboys-player-rankings-should-affect-2011-draft-prep/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Player and position rankings for the Dallas Cowboys in 2010,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-skill-position-grades-through-week-7/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7'>Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7</a> <small>Grades for Tony Romo, DeMarco Murray, Miles Austin and others...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

I am going to begin my 2012 Draft coverage early this year, and you can expect it to be superb. . .<strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/draft/">as per usual</a></strong>.  Between those articles you can also expect to find stat analysis of the Cowboys 2011 season.  Below, I have pasted some interesting numbers from both <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/signature.php?tab=signature&amp;pos=qbr" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a> and my own Excel spreadsheets.  Similar defensive statistics to come.

<strong style="color: #000080;">Tony Romo</strong>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo finished the season fourth in the NFL in passer rating at 102.5, behind only Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees and Tom Brady.  That includes a 104.4 rating in the fourth quarter. . .not bad for a "choke artist." </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Taking away drops, spikes and throw aways, Romo's completion percentage was 73.5%. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>On deep passes of 20+ yards, Romo completed 54.8% of his attempts.  That was second in the league to Aaron Rodgers, but only 11.9% of Romo's passes traveled that long--good for only 13th in the league.  He threw 13 touchdowns and only two picks on deep throws.  I've been saying for years the <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tony-romo-directional-passing-why-dallas-should-throw-deep-more-often/">Cowboys would benefit immensely from more deep passes</a>. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo was under pressure on 30.7% of dropbacks, which was 13th highest in league, but completed 56.7% of his passes in these situations.  That was second-best in the NFL to only Drew Brees<span style="color: #000080;">.</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Dez Bryant, Miles Austin and Laurent Robinson</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys quarterbacks had a 110.8 passer rating when throwing to Dez Bryant, which was the 16th-highest of any receiver in the NFL.  Romo threw three of his interceptions when targeting Bryant.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>I have seen some criticisms of Miles Austin lately, even from "expert" Dallas-area writers.  Don't listen to it.  Austin's only problem has been staying healthy, as Romo posted a 117.8 rating when throwing to Austin, including zero interceptions.  That rating is good for 11th among all receivers.  Austin is an elite wide receiver who will have a monster 2012 season if he stays on the field.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Puzzling to me are Austin's drops.  After a 2010 season in which he struggled with dropping passes, Austin let four more get through his hands this season.  That isn't an enormous amount, but it was 8.5% of catchable passes and good for just 37th in the NFL.  I think this is a small sample size at work, though, as just one less drop would shoot Austin up to 23rd.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Meanwhile, Bryant tallied only one drop all season--second-best in the NFL of any receiver who played 25% of his team's snaps.  Only Golden Tate caught every pass possible.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Laurent Robinson caught 58.8% of deep passes (20+ yards) thrown his way, good for third in NFL.  Austin was 10th at 50.0%, and Bryant 29th at 36.8%.  These numbers are misleading, as Robinson is very rarely the first read on plays.  If he is thrown to, chances are he's fairly open.  Bryant gets balls in double-coverage, and so we'd expect his deep catch rate to be lower.  Larry Fitzgerald, for example, was just 24th in the NFL at 41.2%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Robinson tallied 2.18 yards per route--the top number on the Cowboys.</strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones were both solid at avoiding defenders in 2011, tallying 3.01 and 2.98 yards-after-contact/attempt.  Those rates were 10th and 11th in the league.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray had 36.8% of his yardage come on runs of 15+ yards, which was the 12th-highest rate in the NFL.  Jones was 31st at 26.4%.  Again, this stat can be misleading.  While you always want big plays, a really high "big run rate" can be an indicator that a running back will regress to the mean the following season, rushing for fewer big plays and seeing a decrease in both total yards and yards per attempt.  Murray and Jones are both breakaway players, and I'd expect both of them to be around 35% in any given season.  As an example of how much these numbers can fluctuate, consider that Jones saw 44.0% of his yards come on big plays in 2009, compared to just 15.3% last season.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones were 24th and 26th, respectively, in catch rate at 89.7% and 89.2%</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones both need to improve in pass protection.  Jones allowed a pressure, hit or sack on 6.3% of snaps he was in pass pro.  This was just the 41st-best mark in the NFL.  Murray's 9.7% number came in at 62nd in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Jason Witten dropped 3.61% of balls thrown his way (three total), good for 10th in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>13.5% of Witten's snaps came in the slot.  That was just the 17th-highest percentage for tight ends, and the rate was well behind the top 10 (all of whom played 25+% snaps in slot). </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten was 12th in yards per route at 1.69.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten blocked on only 9.4% of pass plays, well below his rate in past seasons.  He was 18th in the NFL with 3.9% of snaps resulting in a pressure, hit or sack.  Martellus Bennett was 17th, with 3.8% of his snaps resulting in some sort of pressure.  It confirms the notion that Witten and Bennett are similar in pass protection (although Bennett is far superior as a run blocker).  Bennett blocked on 20.1% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Offensive Line</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The entire offensive line was 14th overall in pass blocking efficiency, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on 18.5% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Tyron Smith was the league's 14th most efficient tackle in terms of pass protection, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on just 4.0% of pass plays.  Free was 48th with 6.3%.  He also allowed 10 sacks, which was sixth-worst in the NFL. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn't start in 2012, although he probably will. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Bill Nagy allowed pressure on 4.1% of pass plays, good for 41st in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys Times &#187; Film Study/Stat Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/film-studystats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com</link>
	<description>Unrivaled Dallas Cowboys Info 24/7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should the Cowboys Make a Run at G Carl Nicks?</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl Nicks will be the top free agent guard on the market this offseason.  Should Dallas jump on him?


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think'>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</a> <small>Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats'>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</a> <small>Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In the past week or so, I have written extensively on the Cowboys' offensive line.  In my last post (a look at some <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/">interesting offensive statistics</a></strong> from 2011), I hit you with these numbers:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn’t start in 2012, although he probably will.</strong></li>
</ul>
It is pretty clear the interior line is in disarray in Dallas, and something needs to be done to fix it.  I suggested <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-where-should-doug-free-play/">moving Doug Free to right guard</a></strong> and drafting a right tackle in the first round (with Tyron Smith obviously kicking to the left side).  There are some pros and cons to that plan, but I like it because it instantly upgrades two spots.

Others have suggested the Cowboys might make a run at impending <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4689477/could-cowboys-make-play-for-carl-nicks?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">free agent guard Carl Nicks</a>, though.  Although Jerry Jones has refrained from signing big-money free agents since Jason Garrett has taken over as head coach, this is one I actually believe the 'Boys should jump all over.  Here's why.

Nicks will command a hefty contract, but guards are continually underpaid in the NFL.  He won't garner nearly as much money as an elite left tackle, but his impact (for Dallas, especially) isn't that much less than his tackle counterpart.  We saw how much a weak interior line can affect an offense in 2011.  Don't let it happen again in 2012.

Nicks was the No. 2 ranked guard by <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>, yielding only eight pressures all season.  He had the second-highest pass blocking efficiency in the NFL, allowing a sack, hit or pressure on just 1.4% of pass plays.  Nicks is a dominant run blocker as well.  Saints running backs averaged a ridiculous 5.96 yards-per-carry when Nicks was at the point-of-attack this season.  Compare those numbers with the Cowboys' interior linemen (above).  Dallas backs averaged less than four yards per carry when running behind Holland in 2011, and he's a player whose run blocking I praised as solid.

Personally, I don't think the acquisition of Nicks means the team should automatically forget about switching Free's position.  A tackle-to-guard transition might not seem as appealing with Nicks in town, but an offensive line of Smith, Nicks, Kosier (who can play center), Free, and a rookie right tackle looks pretty damn good to me.  Throw in Holland and Phil Costa as backups, and you're all set.

Either way, Nicks is a player who the Cowboys should seriously consider.  He will demand a pretty penny, but guards are repeatedly undervalued.  He's a player on whom to break the bank this offseason.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is an elite quarterback, the Cowboys' running backs need to improve in pass pro, Montrae Holland played very well in 2011, and Phil Costa shouldn't start in 2012


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/how-dallas-cowboys-player-rankings-should-affect-2011-draft-prep/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Player and position rankings for the Dallas Cowboys in 2010,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-skill-position-grades-through-week-7/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7'>Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7</a> <small>Grades for Tony Romo, DeMarco Murray, Miles Austin and others...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

I am going to begin my 2012 Draft coverage early this year, and you can expect it to be superb. . .<strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/draft/">as per usual</a></strong>.  Between those articles you can also expect to find stat analysis of the Cowboys 2011 season.  Below, I have pasted some interesting numbers from both <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/signature.php?tab=signature&amp;pos=qbr" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a> and my own Excel spreadsheets.  Similar defensive statistics to come.

<strong style="color: #000080;">Tony Romo</strong>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo finished the season fourth in the NFL in passer rating at 102.5, behind only Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees and Tom Brady.  That includes a 104.4 rating in the fourth quarter. . .not bad for a "choke artist." </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Taking away drops, spikes and throw aways, Romo's completion percentage was 73.5%. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>On deep passes of 20+ yards, Romo completed 54.8% of his attempts.  That was second in the league to Aaron Rodgers, but only 11.9% of Romo's passes traveled that long--good for only 13th in the league.  He threw 13 touchdowns and only two picks on deep throws.  I've been saying for years the <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tony-romo-directional-passing-why-dallas-should-throw-deep-more-often/">Cowboys would benefit immensely from more deep passes</a>. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo was under pressure on 30.7% of dropbacks, which was 13th highest in league, but completed 56.7% of his passes in these situations.  That was second-best in the NFL to only Drew Brees<span style="color: #000080;">.</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Dez Bryant, Miles Austin and Laurent Robinson</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys quarterbacks had a 110.8 passer rating when throwing to Dez Bryant, which was the 16th-highest of any receiver in the NFL.  Romo threw three of his interceptions when targeting Bryant.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>I have seen some criticisms of Miles Austin lately, even from "expert" Dallas-area writers.  Don't listen to it.  Austin's only problem has been staying healthy, as Romo posted a 117.8 rating when throwing to Austin, including zero interceptions.  That rating is good for 11th among all receivers.  Austin is an elite wide receiver who will have a monster 2012 season if he stays on the field.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Puzzling to me are Austin's drops.  After a 2010 season in which he struggled with dropping passes, Austin let four more get through his hands this season.  That isn't an enormous amount, but it was 8.5% of catchable passes and good for just 37th in the NFL.  I think this is a small sample size at work, though, as just one less drop would shoot Austin up to 23rd.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Meanwhile, Bryant tallied only one drop all season--second-best in the NFL of any receiver who played 25% of his team's snaps.  Only Golden Tate caught every pass possible.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Laurent Robinson caught 58.8% of deep passes (20+ yards) thrown his way, good for third in NFL.  Austin was 10th at 50.0%, and Bryant 29th at 36.8%.  These numbers are misleading, as Robinson is very rarely the first read on plays.  If he is thrown to, chances are he's fairly open.  Bryant gets balls in double-coverage, and so we'd expect his deep catch rate to be lower.  Larry Fitzgerald, for example, was just 24th in the NFL at 41.2%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Robinson tallied 2.18 yards per route--the top number on the Cowboys.</strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones were both solid at avoiding defenders in 2011, tallying 3.01 and 2.98 yards-after-contact/attempt.  Those rates were 10th and 11th in the league.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray had 36.8% of his yardage come on runs of 15+ yards, which was the 12th-highest rate in the NFL.  Jones was 31st at 26.4%.  Again, this stat can be misleading.  While you always want big plays, a really high "big run rate" can be an indicator that a running back will regress to the mean the following season, rushing for fewer big plays and seeing a decrease in both total yards and yards per attempt.  Murray and Jones are both breakaway players, and I'd expect both of them to be around 35% in any given season.  As an example of how much these numbers can fluctuate, consider that Jones saw 44.0% of his yards come on big plays in 2009, compared to just 15.3% last season.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones were 24th and 26th, respectively, in catch rate at 89.7% and 89.2%</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones both need to improve in pass protection.  Jones allowed a pressure, hit or sack on 6.3% of snaps he was in pass pro.  This was just the 41st-best mark in the NFL.  Murray's 9.7% number came in at 62nd in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Jason Witten dropped 3.61% of balls thrown his way (three total), good for 10th in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>13.5% of Witten's snaps came in the slot.  That was just the 17th-highest percentage for tight ends, and the rate was well behind the top 10 (all of whom played 25+% snaps in slot). </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten was 12th in yards per route at 1.69.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten blocked on only 9.4% of pass plays, well below his rate in past seasons.  He was 18th in the NFL with 3.9% of snaps resulting in a pressure, hit or sack.  Martellus Bennett was 17th, with 3.8% of his snaps resulting in some sort of pressure.  It confirms the notion that Witten and Bennett are similar in pass protection (although Bennett is far superior as a run blocker).  Bennett blocked on 20.1% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Offensive Line</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The entire offensive line was 14th overall in pass blocking efficiency, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on 18.5% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Tyron Smith was the league's 14th most efficient tackle in terms of pass protection, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on just 4.0% of pass plays.  Free was 48th with 6.3%.  He also allowed 10 sacks, which was sixth-worst in the NFL. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn't start in 2012, although he probably will. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Bill Nagy allowed pressure on 4.1% of pass plays, good for 41st in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyzing the Top Tier Offensive Tackles in 2012 NFL Draft</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scouting reports on Matt Kalil, Jonathan Martin and Riley Reiff


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/dallas-cowboys-draft-usc-ot-tyron-smith-no-9-overall/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Initial reactions to the Cowboys selecting USC offensive tackle Tyron...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-potential-draft-pick-in-2011-anthony-castonzo-ot-boston-college/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Scouting report on Boston College offensive tackle Anthony Castonzo, including...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Justin Shoemaker

<em>Editor's Note: A few days ago, we had an article published in the Dallas Observer which argued <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2012/01/cowboys-giants-recap.php" target="_blank">why Doug Free should be moved to guard</a></strong>.  In addition to his contract being a sunk cost and rookie right tackle Tyron Smith being ready to make the switch to the left side, there will also (likely) be a top tier offensive tackle available for Dallas with the 14th overall selection.  While the team needs all the help it can get on defense, selecting an OT in the first round would instantly upgrade two positions.  DCT contributor Justin Shoemaker took some time to analyze the top three offensive tackle prospects in the 2012 NFL Draft.</em>

<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Matt Kalil (USC)</strong></span>

- sole reason Tyron Smith played right tackle for USC

-incredible footwork and very nimble for a  6’7'' guy. . .has the size to dominate in the power running game but the quickness to get out on counters, tosses and screens

- very comparable to Joe Thomas and Jake Long. . .has tools to be All-Pro

- unless Dallas moves up, he will be out of reach (likely No. 2 overall)

- Note from Jonathan: When I began studying Tyron Smith last year, I just assumed he was a left tackle.  After a couple plays I realized the player I was reviewing was white, so I had a pretty good idea I wasn't watching Smith.  I kept watching, though, because that player (Kalil) was absolutely dominant.  I can say I wholeheartedly believe Kalil is the top offensive tackle prospect I have seen. . .ever.  He's superior to Thomas and Long, in my opinions, and he will be an All-Pro for a decade.

<strong><span style="color: #a93022;">Jonathan Martin (Stanford)</span></strong>

- has protected Andrew Luck, but may have looked better than reality due to Luck's quick release (in much the same way Peyton Manning has made his average line look elite)

- surprisingly better in run blocking than pass protection

- versatile enough to play RT or LT; can set the edge, but still has agility to get to second level

- can play aggressively and with an attitude at times, but then becomes defensive and gives up too much ground to the pass rusher.

- seems to struggle when matched up on nine-technique players or 3-4 outside linebackers; thrives against "power" seven or five-technique rushers

- still has plenty of room to improve technique; would be instant upgrade over Free, even at right tackle

<span style="color: #ffcc00;"><strong>Riley Reiff (Iowa)</strong></span>

-typical Big 10 lineman, which means everyone loves the run blocking ability. . .will have more knocks on his pass protection

-can get a little stiff and awkward in both run blocking and pass protection; not a natural athlete like Kalil or Martin

-great awareness of the pocket and pushing the defender beyond it; will let defenders rush themselves out of play

-could be beast in various run blocking schemes, but may not fit as well for the Cowboys if they plan to incorporate more "finesse" runs with Murray and Jones

- no quit attitude until the whistle blows, play contagious to teammates (he's a Marc Colombo with skill)

-very much like fellow Hawkeye Bryan Bulaga,

- probably not enough value at No. 14

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 17: How Dallas Can Win the NFC East</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas in Week 17


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup'>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</a> <small>The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In addition to my article for the Times on <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/how-dallas-should-attack-giants-pass-defense/" target="_blank">how Dallas can beat Cover 2 Man Under</a></strong> this weekend in the Meadowlands, I also did a piece for the <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">Dallas Observer</a></strong>.  Head over there to check out my <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas</a>. </strong>Along with more analysis of the coverage which irritated Dallas in Week 14, I add a full game plan for the 'Boys.  Here are some of the highlights:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Don't blitz often.  Eli Manning's passer rating against the blitz is very comparable to that when four or less defenders rush him, but the Cowboys do not have the talent in the secondary to deal with a blitz that fails.  The team should be in the business of playing aggressively while still allowing for a chance to win the game late, and yielding quick scores due to unsuccessful blitz attempts won't help.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The 'Boys should mimic the Giants' Week 14 game plan by playing a lot of Cover 2 Man Under.  By keeping everything in front of them, the defense can maximize their chances of halting Hakeem Nicks and Victor Cruz and force either a tight end or a running back to beat them.  Although Brandon Jacobs wore down Dallas in the teams' last meeting, Ahmad Bradshaw is the more likely of the two to give Dallas fits this week.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Giants pass a lot out of double-tight formations, so the Cowboys cannot sell out to defend the run when they see the look.  The G-Men used a double-tight set 34 times in Week 14, so the 'Boys better be ready for it.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Cowboys, on the other hand, do tip their play calls via their formation, personnel package, or down-and-distance.  Jason Garrett could benefit from being a bit less predictable this week.  Garrett's predictability could be utilized to get the ball downfield with play action. But since 2009, Dallas quarterbacks have thrown for 20-plus yards on only 8.7 percent of play-action passes. And in two-plus years of passes, Garrett has called a play-action pass only eight times with 1-4 yards-to-go for a first down -- the situations when faking a run would actually work. Instead, he's called for a play-action look on 11 plays with 20-plus yards-to-go, when showing a running play is either an obvious decoy or hopeless.</strong></li>
</ul>
For additional analysis, <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">head over to the Observer</a></strong> and leave your comments there.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Grading the 'Boys"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the remainder of the season


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-defensive-linelinebackers/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Sean Lee has played better than Jay Ratliff, and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-times-final-2010-player-position-rankings/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Victor Butler and Martellus Bennett over Dez Bryant? Orlando Scandrick...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Believe it or not, the Dallas Cowboys are going to see a dramatic downgrade at guard with the loss of Montrae Holland to a torn biceps.  I have been critical of Holland in the past, providing him with a C+ grade in my <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/01/grading-the-boys-in-2010-part-vii-offensive-line/" target="_blank">2010 Offensive Line Grades</a></strong>.  Holland is not an incredible athlete and can appear slow-footed at times, often struggling with quick defensive tackles.  Nonetheless, he outplayed every Cowboys offensive linemen not named Tyron Smith in 2011.  Here is why. . .

Holland participated in 641 snaps this season, 361 of which were in pass protection.  He yielded eight pressures, one hit and two sacks in those snaps, good for a pressure rate of 2.21%.  While not at an elite level, that rate is still quite good.  As a comparison, right guard Kyle Kosier has a pressure rate of 2.85% this season.  That falls right in line with his pressure rate of 2.82% from 2010, providing a statistically significant sample size.  You can see the overall 2010 numbers below.

[caption id="attachment_8652" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="  "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-8652" title="2010 OL Pass Pro" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1-300x192.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="192" /></a>[/caption]

Many of you know I often praise Kosier's pass protection ability, and Holland has been superior to the veteran in 2011.  To get a broader sense of Holland's 2011 success, I took a look at the numbers of some of the top-graded guards (and middle tier guards) on <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>.

[caption id="attachment_9372" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9372" title="Guard Pressure Rates 2011" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011-300x158.png" alt="" width="300" height="158" /></a>[/caption]

You can see Holland's pressure rate, although not elite, was well above-average.  The #32 and #33 ranked guards at PFF surrendered pressure rates up to 46% higher than Holland's.  On top of that, I would grade Holland as the Cowboys' second-best run blocker all season if I was turning in my grades today.  I would provide him with a 'B' in both run blocking and pass protection, and that run blocking grade will undoubtedly be higher than all non-rookie offensive linemen in Big D.

Whether Derrick Dockery or Kevin Kowalski replaces Holland, the Cowboys will see a decline in production.  Holland was having a really strong 2011 campaign. . .and one which was being overlooked even by me.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking Cowboys&#8217; Improvements Over Last Decade</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using EPA to track the historic performance of the Dallas Cowboys


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/rob-ryans-defensive-fronts-the-46-psycho-and-cloud/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing Rob Ryan's defensive fronts, including the "46," "Psycho," and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/03/rob-ryans-zone-blitzes-how-teams-attack-fire-zones-and-how-dallas-can-respond/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>The title says it all....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/11/predictability-remains-in-jason-garretts-play-calling/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling'>Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling</a> <small>Analyzing predictability within Jason Garrett's play-calling and how the Cowboys...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Over at <strong><a href="http://wp.advancednflstats.com/yearstatvisualization.php" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a></strong>, a new feature has taken the world (my world) by storm.  If you click on the link, you can see the offensive and defensive "Expected Points Added" (a metric used to grade each play of a football game--a touchdown obviously has an EPA of six, while a 1st and Goal at the one-yard line is very close that number).  By tracking EPA, you can determine which teams are playing well, even if it is not reflected in their record, and which have simply been lucky.  For us here at DCT, we can take a look at the improvements of the Cowboys over the past decade.  Click on the link above to check out the graphs, or just scroll below.

[caption id="attachment_9304" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9304" title="DAL EPA per game" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-300x216.png" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a>[/caption]

In the first graph, you can see the Cowboys' historic offensive performance as compared to their defensive efficiency.  A few notes:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Since Jason Garrett has taken over as the offensive coordinator, the Cowboys have had well above-average offensive efficiency in every year except for 2008. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Their best season over the last decade, as you might guess, was in 2007.  This season has fallen right in line with 2006 and 2009. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Somewhat surprisingly, the best defenses in Dallas were in the first part of the 2000s.  Since Garrett has been in town, the Cowboys have been below-average on defense, in terms of EPA, every year.</strong></li>
</ul>
[caption id="attachment_9305" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9305" title="DAL EPA per game offense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense-300x105.png" alt="" width="300" height="105" /></a>[/caption]

Above, you can track the Cowboys' offensive improvements over the last 10+ years.  The most important aspect of this graph, in my view, is the fact that offensive performance is leveling out under Garrett.  Yes, the offense has been really solid during Garrett's tenure, but we see the team was moving in that direction since 2002.  There are two ways to look at this. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>The first is that Garrett is overrated as an offensive coordinator because the offense improved for multiple years since 2002 and their play has been stagnant since Garrett took over.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The other way to view the graph is that the Cowboys were bound to improve since their horrible 2002 campaign, and Garrett's ability to keep the offense around the 5.0 EPA/G mark is a testament to his ability. </strong></li>
</ul>
I think we are seeing more of the second explanation than the first.  If the Cowboys were consistently ranked No. 1 in offense each year, we wouldn't say Garrett has shown an inability to improve as a coordinator.  When teams are playing at either a very high or very low level, we are sure to see their play regress to the mean.  This is one reason why it should be a coach's dream to take over a 1-15 team.  Even if the coach does absolutely nothing right, the team will likely win more games the following season, and the coach will be viewed as "improving" his squad.  The fact that the offensive EPA has "leveled out" with Garrett here is a good thing.

Onto the defense. . .

[caption id="attachment_9306" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9306" title="DAL EPA per game defense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense-300x100.png" alt="" width="300" height="100" /></a>[/caption]

This is where the Cowboys need to improve to become a Championship-caliber football team.  Still, the "decline" in defensive production since the early part of the decade is not as drastic as it seems.  The Cowboys have become a far better offensive football team over the last five years because they have been able to throw the ball well.  In the early part of the 2000s, that wasn't the case.  The team opted to shorten games under head coach Bill Parcells, and that resulted in a superior EPA/G as compared to the current defense.

It is not the job of a coach to maximize offensive or defensive EPA, however, but rather to create the largest gap between their team and the opposition.  EPA is not an efficiency stat as we are using it here, so the "superior" EPA/G displayed by the early-2000s Cowboys does not <em>necessarily </em>represent a better defensive football team.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Film Obervations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14 loss to the Giants


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/assessing-football-strategy-is-running-the-football-often-necessary/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing the merits of short kickoffs, rushing the ball often,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/another-epic-collapse-thoughts-on-cowboys-week-14-loss-to-giants/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants'>Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants</a> <small>Why the Cowboys should have let the Giants score late,...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

One of my favorite things to do when I watch the Cowboys' games at home is track the team's win probability throughout the night using <a href="http://live.advancednflstats.com/index.php?gameid1=2011121113" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>' win probability charts.  Using a model which takes the down-and-distance, score, and time into account, ANS is able to determine the probability of a team winning a game at any point in time.  This information doesn't stem from estimates, but rather years of NFL data.

It is always fascinating to see how certain plays can influence a team's chances of winning.  Punts, for example, often result in a fairly significant drop in win probability because giving away possession is generally detrimental to a team.  Near the beginning of games, it takes a huge play to swing win probability in a major way.  A 4th and Goal defensive stop while up six points with 45 minutes to play might result in a big bump in win probability, but that same play would be much larger--perhaps from around 50% to 100%--if the play was the final one of the game.

Using the graph from Sunday night's game, I thought it would be fun to take a look at which plays affected the Cowboys' win probability most significantly.  Below, you can see the chart, along with 10 plays (or short sequences) which I have labeled as the most important. . .

[caption id="attachment_9270" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="CLICK TO ENLARGE "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9270 " title="Cowboys Giants Week 14 Win Probability" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability-300x191.png" alt="" width="300" height="191" /></a>[/caption]

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 1: 64-yard pass to Hakeem Nicks on 3rd and 7 at NYG 32; 53:44 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP (win probability) drops from 42 to 25 (-17%)</strong></li>
</ul>
A 17% drop in win probability in the middle of the first quarter is a big one.  This wouldn't have been much higher even if Nicks scored.  Poor coverage by Alan Ball.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 2: 26-yard gain by Felix Jones on 1st and 10 at NYG 42; 48:19 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 42 to 52 (+10%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The touchdown pass to John Phillips put Dallas on top, but Jones and a subsequent defensive holding penalty put the 'Boys in position to score.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 3: Felix Jones fumbles on 1st and 10 and ball recovered by NYG at DAL 14; 31:38 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 57 to 38 (-19%)</strong></li>
</ul>
This had the potential to be devastating to Dallas but they made the best of the situation by holding New York to a field goal and kicking one of their own before halftime.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 4: 47-yard touchdown pass to Mario Manningham on 3rd and 5 at DAL 47; 19:39 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 70 to 45 (-25%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Yielding a 47-yard score on a crucial 3rd down due to a broken coverage is heartbreaking.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 5: 74-yard pass to Laurent Robinson on 3rd and 10 at DAL 20; 13:17 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 38 to 66 (+28%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Other than the blocked field goal to end the game, this pass to Robinson was the most important one of the contest for Dallas.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 6: 15-yard completion to Mario Manningham on 4th and 3 at DAL 37; 8:24 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 78 to 56 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Here, you can see how game situation affects win probability.  The pass was only 15 yards long, but it came on a crucial 4th and 3 with just over eight minutes left to play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 7: Sean Lee interception on 3rd and 9 at DAL 21; 6:50 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 62 to 89 (+27%)</strong></li>
</ul>
I actually thought this would be more valuable to Dallas, but the fact that it came on a difficult 3rd and 9 (when New York's chances of converting were low) likely affected the jump in WP.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 8: Cowboys' three-and-out; 2:20 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 88 to 67 (-21%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Romo's infamous incompletion to Austin hurt Dallas in a big way.  If you assume Romo hits that pass 90% of the time and Dallas' wins 99% of games following a completion, the actual dip in WP would be closer to -31%.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 9: Holding on Abram Elam and 18-yard completion to Jake Ballard on 1st and 10 at DAL 19; 1:21 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 49 to 27 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The holding penalty on Elam has been overlooked.  DeMarcus Ware's offside penalty was also costly, but the full extent of it isn't factored into the WP chart because the errant snap and loss by the Giants isn't reflected in the play-by-play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 10: Blocked FG; 0:06 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 44 to &lt;1 (-43%)</strong></li>
</ul>
And the Cowboys' playoff chances drop from potentially around 90% with a win to now around 40% .

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Watch (Game Preview)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-review-romo-at-fault/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Thoughts on the Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with the New...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/cowboys-must-capitalize-on-takeaways/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why the Cowboys must capitalize when they force turnovers, and...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it (everyone, I'm assuming), I had an article published on The New York Times' football blog <em>The Fifth Down </em>titled <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/keys-to-defeating-dallas-from-a-cowboys-writer/" target="_blank">Keys to Defeating Dallas, From a Cowboys Writer</a></strong>.  You can (and should) click on the link to read it.

Before I receive the inevitable backlash for writing such blasphemous content, let me point out that this article is not much different than my traditional "DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas" weekly post.  Instead of explaining what Dallas needs to do for a win, however, I simply flipped the script.  "Protect Doug Free" would have been sound advice for Dallas this week, and you will find a corresponding "Attack Doug Free" bullet point in my New York Times piece.

You can find all of my thoughts on the Week 14 matchup in that post.  Here, I wanted to take a look at the broader picture, assessing both the Cowboys' and Giants' odds of making the playoffs after the contest.  There are a number of ways to do that.  In this article, I will conduct a schedule analysis, estimating the odds of each team winning their remaining games and determining how that relates to the subsequent importance of this particular matchup for each squad.

In the beginning of the season, the importance of the strength of a team's schedule is very overblown, and for a variety of reasons.  First, when comparing the schedules of two division opponents, the 14 games which are not head-to-head contain just two dissimilarities, i.e. the Giants and Cowboys had just two opponents which differed.  Secondly, the constant talent flux in the NFL makes preseason predictions in regards to a team's strength of schedule almost useless.  Who wold have thought the Raiders, Bengals, Bills, Lions, etc. would not be "easy wins" in 2011?  Lastly, the overall strength of a schedule tends to even out over the course of a 16-game season.  Simply put, preseason strength of schedule sucks as a method by which to analyze a team's playoff hopes.

By Week 14, however, a team's remaining schedule has a huge influence in their odds of making the playoffs.  Over the course of four games, it is certainly possible to have three or four strong/weak opponents, meaning the schedule doesn't necessarily have time to "even out."  Plus, we already know the relative strength of each NFL team, so estimating each team's win probability for a single game is far easier.

With all of that said, let's take a look at the Giants' and Cowboys' remaining schedules, along with the probability they win each game. . .

[caption id="attachment_9257" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9257" title="Dallas Cowboys New York Giants 2011 WP" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP-300x164.png" alt="" width="300" height="164" /></a>[/caption]

While the probabilities I used are "just" estimates, they are well-researched, solid estimates using advanced statistics gathered from <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/team-rankings-week-fourteen.html" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>.  Using their Generic Win Probability (the odds a team will win a game against a league-average opponent at a neutral site), we can estimate the chances of Dallas and New York winning each remaining game by combining the teams' GWP and factoring in home field advantage.  Thus, while I am "guessing" the odds of wins for the teams in their remaining contests, those probabilities are likely not too far from reality.

If we give each team a win total that directly correlates with their probabilities, i.e. the Cowboys' 54% chance of winning this week's matchup equates to ".54 wins," you can see the Cowboys' theoretical win total for the rest of the 2011 season is 2.37, while the Giants' is 2.40.  That difference is obviously not statistically significant, meaning the small errors which are undoubtedly contained within my win probability projections are surely enough to "make up for" this difference.

In other words, the Cowboys and Giants can be expected to win the same number of games moving forward.  Note that this conclusion does not mean the teams <em>will</em> win the same number of games, but rather that their chances of doing so are the most likely of all possible outcomes.

So what does this all mean for their playoff chances?  The incredible similarity between the teams and their win probability moving forward means that each's respective chances of making the playoffs, even after we factor in the schedule, are roughly the same as if they were both of league-average quality.

Think of it this way: if a team of the same quality of the Colts was 7-5 (like Dallas) and one with a talent level comparable to that of Green Bay was 6-6 (like New York), we'd still expect Green Bay's odds of making the playoffs to be greater due to their far higher win probability in each game.  The role of chance in that situation is less powerful than in the case of the 'Boys and G-Men.

In the latter comparison, we have two teams whose win probabilities for the remainder of the season are roughly equal.  This means that the chances of the Giants making the playoffs, taking their one-game deficit into account, are roughly the same as if we flipped a coin to determine the outcome of each contest.  Perform 10,000 coin flip simulations to allow the numbers to regress to the mean, and you will be left with each team's playoff chances.

Luckily, we have computers which can simulate seasons, so we don't need to waste time flipping a coin.  Over at <a href="http://files.nfl-forecast.com/archives/120" target="_blank">NFL-Forecast.com</a>, they have determined each team's chances of making the playoffs based on thousands of simulations with the GWP provided by Advanced NFL Stats.  If you head over there, you will see the odds of Dallas winning the NFC East are around 64%, with their overall playoff chances adding up to nearly 69% (meaning there is little chance they earn a Wild Card spot).  The Giants' odds are 35% to win the division and 36% to make the playoffs.

In terms of particular scenarios, the Cowboys will win the division if they beat the Giants in both of the clubs' remaining games.  If the Giants perform the same task, they will win the division as long as they do not lose both of their other two games <em>or</em> the Cowboys do not win both of their other games.  Simply put, if one squad wins both head-to-head games, they are effectively the NFC East champs.

If the more probable splitting of head-to-head games occurs, the Cowboys are in with one more win.  Let me break it down for you.  If the teams split and the Cowboys lose to Philly and beat Tampa Bay, for example, they would finish 9-7 and possess the same record as the Giants if they beat both the Redskins and Jets. Then, intricate tiebreakers would come into play.  As shown on <a href="http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures" target="_blank">NFL.com</a>, those are:
<ol>
	<li>Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference</li>
</ol>
The first tiebreaker would obviously end in a tie following a split.  If the Cowboys lose to either the Eagles and Bucs (and the Giants win against the 'Skins and Jets), the teams would finish 9-7 and both have a division record of 3-3, meaning the third tiebreaker would be a factor.  In common games (all but two, remember), the Giants and Cowboys would again be tied at 9-5 (including their head-to-head split).  Thus, the <em>fourth</em> tiebreaker is needed.  Here, the Cowboys have the advantage, as they will have a superior conference record following a split, no matter how the other games shake out.

Let's recap. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are in the playoffs.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Giants sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are almost assuredly in the playoffs.  They would miss out if they lose both remaining games and the Cowboys win both.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the teams split, the Cowboys are in if they win one of their other games.  If the Cowboys lose both of those games, the Giants are in if they win both of their remaining contests.</strong></li>
</ul>
For Dallas, all of the math equates to one simple conclusion: win this week, and you will almost certainly be NFC East champs.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Jason Garrett&#8217;s Late-Game Clock Management</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Jason Garrett deserves even more blame than he is receiving for his late-game clock management 


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/why-jason-garrett-was-wrong-to-run-late-vs-new-england/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why calling three straight runs in the fourth quarter against...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command'>Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command</a> <small>The title is self-explanatory. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/more-on-jason-garretts-decision-to-run-late-vs-pats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Responding to some reader comments on Jason Garrett's late-game play-calling...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it, I published a rather <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/">harsh criticism of Jason Garrett</a></strong> last night, explaining why his lack of courage is a hindrance to the Dallas Cowboys.  As long as Garrett is punting on 4th and 1 at the opponent's 35-yard line or displaying atrocious (if there was a word that was worse, I would us that) clock management skills, this team will cease to capitalize on their potential.

After time to contemplate the value of his decision to not call a timeout late in the fourth quarter of Sunday's loss, Garrett must surely see the error of his ways, right?  Nope.  <a href="http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/_/id/7317155/dallas-cowboys-jason-garrett-explains-late-game-clock-management-loss-arizona-cardinals" target="_blank">Said Garrett</a>:
<blockquote>We very well could have taken a timeout there. We felt like we were in field-goal range. We have yard lines that we use as guidelines before the game. We felt like we were in range at that point.  Tony had them on the line of scrimmage quickly, so we went ahead and clocked it and used that as a timeout. You see so many situations where you have negative plays in those situations. We felt like we were in (Dan Bailey's) range to give him a chance to kick the game-winner. . .We felt pretty good about where we were. Once you get to that 30-yard line we felt like that was a pretty good opportunity for us.</blockquote>
You cannot be serious, Jason.  There were 23 seconds left on the clock when the Cowboys obtained a first down at the Cardinals' 31-yard line, so Garrett's insinuation that the offense clocked the ball "quickly" is erroneous.  On top of that, spiking the ball "as a timeout" is the entire reason no one in their right mind can understand what was going through your own yesterday.

With two timeouts in hand, how in the world do you not use one with 23 seconds on the clock?  Even if you decide you do not want to try to advance the ball down the field, why not at least give yourself the option?  If you (mistakenly) want to settle for a 49-yard field goal attempt, why not run Romo to the middle of the field, let the clock run down, then attempt the field goal with your kicker in a better spot?

Of course, the no-brainer coaching decision is to immediately call timeout and work harder to get the ball downfield.  Instead, Garrett coached scared, disregarding the numbers in favor of not risking a big loss.  But what are "the numbers"?  Let's see. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>On average, a kicker has a <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/11/just-for-kicks.html" target="_blank">65% chance of converting</a> a 49-yard field goal try.
</strong></li>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys gained six more yards, those odds increase to 75%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys had passed the football, there chances of giving up a sack (based on season averages) were 4.0%.  In reality, they were lower because this wasn't a "normal" game situation and Romo would be more willing to throw the ball away at the first sign of trouble than on, say, a 1st and 10 in the first quarter.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>A loss of six yards would equate to a field goal try on which kickers have displayed around 50% accuracy. </strong></li>
</ul>
For Garrett's decision to let the clock tick down to be correct, we would have to assume the Cowboys' offense has less than a 6% chance of gaining six yards on a passing play.  Anyone think that is the case?  Me neither.

One of the major mistakes Garrett made was in his binary thinking regarding field goals.  Brian Burke of Advanced NFL Stats<a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/unicorns-tooth-fairy-cowboys-and-field.html" target="_blank"> pointed that out</a>, discussing Garrett's black-and-white ideas:
<blockquote>Also, note Garrett's conception of "field goal range." He has a yard line established before the game. That kind of thinking assumes a yes-or-no, black-and-white idea of a field goal attempt. Either you're in range or you're not. If we're in "range", and the kicker misses, well, that's his fault. This is a failure to think in probabilistic terms.</blockquote>
The sort of false dichotomy Garrett displayed with his thinking shows he either does not understand statistics at a fundamental level, or he understands them and coaches to limit the blame which could be placed upon him after defeat, instead exposing his players to it.  I think it is the latter.  Unfortunately for Dallas, cowards don't win Super Bowls.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tony Romo Directional Passing: Why Dallas Should Throw Deep More Often</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scouting reports on Matt Kalil, Jonathan Martin and Riley Reiff


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/dallas-cowboys-draft-usc-ot-tyron-smith-no-9-overall/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Initial reactions to the Cowboys selecting USC offensive tackle Tyron...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-potential-draft-pick-in-2011-anthony-castonzo-ot-boston-college/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Scouting report on Boston College offensive tackle Anthony Castonzo, including...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Justin Shoemaker

<em>Editor's Note: A few days ago, we had an article published in the Dallas Observer which argued <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2012/01/cowboys-giants-recap.php" target="_blank">why Doug Free should be moved to guard</a></strong>.  In addition to his contract being a sunk cost and rookie right tackle Tyron Smith being ready to make the switch to the left side, there will also (likely) be a top tier offensive tackle available for Dallas with the 14th overall selection.  While the team needs all the help it can get on defense, selecting an OT in the first round would instantly upgrade two positions.  DCT contributor Justin Shoemaker took some time to analyze the top three offensive tackle prospects in the 2012 NFL Draft.</em>

<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Matt Kalil (USC)</strong></span>

- sole reason Tyron Smith played right tackle for USC

-incredible footwork and very nimble for a  6’7'' guy. . .has the size to dominate in the power running game but the quickness to get out on counters, tosses and screens

- very comparable to Joe Thomas and Jake Long. . .has tools to be All-Pro

- unless Dallas moves up, he will be out of reach (likely No. 2 overall)

- Note from Jonathan: When I began studying Tyron Smith last year, I just assumed he was a left tackle.  After a couple plays I realized the player I was reviewing was white, so I had a pretty good idea I wasn't watching Smith.  I kept watching, though, because that player (Kalil) was absolutely dominant.  I can say I wholeheartedly believe Kalil is the top offensive tackle prospect I have seen. . .ever.  He's superior to Thomas and Long, in my opinions, and he will be an All-Pro for a decade.

<strong><span style="color: #a93022;">Jonathan Martin (Stanford)</span></strong>

- has protected Andrew Luck, but may have looked better than reality due to Luck's quick release (in much the same way Peyton Manning has made his average line look elite)

- surprisingly better in run blocking than pass protection

- versatile enough to play RT or LT; can set the edge, but still has agility to get to second level

- can play aggressively and with an attitude at times, but then becomes defensive and gives up too much ground to the pass rusher.

- seems to struggle when matched up on nine-technique players or 3-4 outside linebackers; thrives against "power" seven or five-technique rushers

- still has plenty of room to improve technique; would be instant upgrade over Free, even at right tackle

<span style="color: #ffcc00;"><strong>Riley Reiff (Iowa)</strong></span>

-typical Big 10 lineman, which means everyone loves the run blocking ability. . .will have more knocks on his pass protection

-can get a little stiff and awkward in both run blocking and pass protection; not a natural athlete like Kalil or Martin

-great awareness of the pocket and pushing the defender beyond it; will let defenders rush themselves out of play

-could be beast in various run blocking schemes, but may not fit as well for the Cowboys if they plan to incorporate more "finesse" runs with Murray and Jones

- no quit attitude until the whistle blows, play contagious to teammates (he's a Marc Colombo with skill)

-very much like fellow Hawkeye Bryan Bulaga,

- probably not enough value at No. 14

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys Times &#187; Film Study/Stat Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/film-studystats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com</link>
	<description>Unrivaled Dallas Cowboys Info 24/7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should the Cowboys Make a Run at G Carl Nicks?</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl Nicks will be the top free agent guard on the market this offseason.  Should Dallas jump on him?


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think'>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</a> <small>Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats'>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</a> <small>Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In the past week or so, I have written extensively on the Cowboys' offensive line.  In my last post (a look at some <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/">interesting offensive statistics</a></strong> from 2011), I hit you with these numbers:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn’t start in 2012, although he probably will.</strong></li>
</ul>
It is pretty clear the interior line is in disarray in Dallas, and something needs to be done to fix it.  I suggested <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-where-should-doug-free-play/">moving Doug Free to right guard</a></strong> and drafting a right tackle in the first round (with Tyron Smith obviously kicking to the left side).  There are some pros and cons to that plan, but I like it because it instantly upgrades two spots.

Others have suggested the Cowboys might make a run at impending <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4689477/could-cowboys-make-play-for-carl-nicks?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">free agent guard Carl Nicks</a>, though.  Although Jerry Jones has refrained from signing big-money free agents since Jason Garrett has taken over as head coach, this is one I actually believe the 'Boys should jump all over.  Here's why.

Nicks will command a hefty contract, but guards are continually underpaid in the NFL.  He won't garner nearly as much money as an elite left tackle, but his impact (for Dallas, especially) isn't that much less than his tackle counterpart.  We saw how much a weak interior line can affect an offense in 2011.  Don't let it happen again in 2012.

Nicks was the No. 2 ranked guard by <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>, yielding only eight pressures all season.  He had the second-highest pass blocking efficiency in the NFL, allowing a sack, hit or pressure on just 1.4% of pass plays.  Nicks is a dominant run blocker as well.  Saints running backs averaged a ridiculous 5.96 yards-per-carry when Nicks was at the point-of-attack this season.  Compare those numbers with the Cowboys' interior linemen (above).  Dallas backs averaged less than four yards per carry when running behind Holland in 2011, and he's a player whose run blocking I praised as solid.

Personally, I don't think the acquisition of Nicks means the team should automatically forget about switching Free's position.  A tackle-to-guard transition might not seem as appealing with Nicks in town, but an offensive line of Smith, Nicks, Kosier (who can play center), Free, and a rookie right tackle looks pretty damn good to me.  Throw in Holland and Phil Costa as backups, and you're all set.

Either way, Nicks is a player who the Cowboys should seriously consider.  He will demand a pretty penny, but guards are repeatedly undervalued.  He's a player on whom to break the bank this offseason.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is an elite quarterback, the Cowboys' running backs need to improve in pass pro, Montrae Holland played very well in 2011, and Phil Costa shouldn't start in 2012


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/how-dallas-cowboys-player-rankings-should-affect-2011-draft-prep/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Player and position rankings for the Dallas Cowboys in 2010,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-skill-position-grades-through-week-7/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7'>Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7</a> <small>Grades for Tony Romo, DeMarco Murray, Miles Austin and others...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

I am going to begin my 2012 Draft coverage early this year, and you can expect it to be superb. . .<strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/draft/">as per usual</a></strong>.  Between those articles you can also expect to find stat analysis of the Cowboys 2011 season.  Below, I have pasted some interesting numbers from both <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/signature.php?tab=signature&amp;pos=qbr" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a> and my own Excel spreadsheets.  Similar defensive statistics to come.

<strong style="color: #000080;">Tony Romo</strong>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo finished the season fourth in the NFL in passer rating at 102.5, behind only Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees and Tom Brady.  That includes a 104.4 rating in the fourth quarter. . .not bad for a "choke artist." </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Taking away drops, spikes and throw aways, Romo's completion percentage was 73.5%. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>On deep passes of 20+ yards, Romo completed 54.8% of his attempts.  That was second in the league to Aaron Rodgers, but only 11.9% of Romo's passes traveled that long--good for only 13th in the league.  He threw 13 touchdowns and only two picks on deep throws.  I've been saying for years the <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tony-romo-directional-passing-why-dallas-should-throw-deep-more-often/">Cowboys would benefit immensely from more deep passes</a>. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo was under pressure on 30.7% of dropbacks, which was 13th highest in league, but completed 56.7% of his passes in these situations.  That was second-best in the NFL to only Drew Brees<span style="color: #000080;">.</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Dez Bryant, Miles Austin and Laurent Robinson</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys quarterbacks had a 110.8 passer rating when throwing to Dez Bryant, which was the 16th-highest of any receiver in the NFL.  Romo threw three of his interceptions when targeting Bryant.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>I have seen some criticisms of Miles Austin lately, even from "expert" Dallas-area writers.  Don't listen to it.  Austin's only problem has been staying healthy, as Romo posted a 117.8 rating when throwing to Austin, including zero interceptions.  That rating is good for 11th among all receivers.  Austin is an elite wide receiver who will have a monster 2012 season if he stays on the field.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Puzzling to me are Austin's drops.  After a 2010 season in which he struggled with dropping passes, Austin let four more get through his hands this season.  That isn't an enormous amount, but it was 8.5% of catchable passes and good for just 37th in the NFL.  I think this is a small sample size at work, though, as just one less drop would shoot Austin up to 23rd.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Meanwhile, Bryant tallied only one drop all season--second-best in the NFL of any receiver who played 25% of his team's snaps.  Only Golden Tate caught every pass possible.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Laurent Robinson caught 58.8% of deep passes (20+ yards) thrown his way, good for third in NFL.  Austin was 10th at 50.0%, and Bryant 29th at 36.8%.  These numbers are misleading, as Robinson is very rarely the first read on plays.  If he is thrown to, chances are he's fairly open.  Bryant gets balls in double-coverage, and so we'd expect his deep catch rate to be lower.  Larry Fitzgerald, for example, was just 24th in the NFL at 41.2%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Robinson tallied 2.18 yards per route--the top number on the Cowboys.</strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones were both solid at avoiding defenders in 2011, tallying 3.01 and 2.98 yards-after-contact/attempt.  Those rates were 10th and 11th in the league.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray had 36.8% of his yardage come on runs of 15+ yards, which was the 12th-highest rate in the NFL.  Jones was 31st at 26.4%.  Again, this stat can be misleading.  While you always want big plays, a really high "big run rate" can be an indicator that a running back will regress to the mean the following season, rushing for fewer big plays and seeing a decrease in both total yards and yards per attempt.  Murray and Jones are both breakaway players, and I'd expect both of them to be around 35% in any given season.  As an example of how much these numbers can fluctuate, consider that Jones saw 44.0% of his yards come on big plays in 2009, compared to just 15.3% last season.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones were 24th and 26th, respectively, in catch rate at 89.7% and 89.2%</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones both need to improve in pass protection.  Jones allowed a pressure, hit or sack on 6.3% of snaps he was in pass pro.  This was just the 41st-best mark in the NFL.  Murray's 9.7% number came in at 62nd in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Jason Witten dropped 3.61% of balls thrown his way (three total), good for 10th in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>13.5% of Witten's snaps came in the slot.  That was just the 17th-highest percentage for tight ends, and the rate was well behind the top 10 (all of whom played 25+% snaps in slot). </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten was 12th in yards per route at 1.69.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten blocked on only 9.4% of pass plays, well below his rate in past seasons.  He was 18th in the NFL with 3.9% of snaps resulting in a pressure, hit or sack.  Martellus Bennett was 17th, with 3.8% of his snaps resulting in some sort of pressure.  It confirms the notion that Witten and Bennett are similar in pass protection (although Bennett is far superior as a run blocker).  Bennett blocked on 20.1% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Offensive Line</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The entire offensive line was 14th overall in pass blocking efficiency, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on 18.5% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Tyron Smith was the league's 14th most efficient tackle in terms of pass protection, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on just 4.0% of pass plays.  Free was 48th with 6.3%.  He also allowed 10 sacks, which was sixth-worst in the NFL. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn't start in 2012, although he probably will. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Bill Nagy allowed pressure on 4.1% of pass plays, good for 41st in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyzing the Top Tier Offensive Tackles in 2012 NFL Draft</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scouting reports on Matt Kalil, Jonathan Martin and Riley Reiff


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/dallas-cowboys-draft-usc-ot-tyron-smith-no-9-overall/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Initial reactions to the Cowboys selecting USC offensive tackle Tyron...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-potential-draft-pick-in-2011-anthony-castonzo-ot-boston-college/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Scouting report on Boston College offensive tackle Anthony Castonzo, including...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Justin Shoemaker

<em>Editor's Note: A few days ago, we had an article published in the Dallas Observer which argued <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2012/01/cowboys-giants-recap.php" target="_blank">why Doug Free should be moved to guard</a></strong>.  In addition to his contract being a sunk cost and rookie right tackle Tyron Smith being ready to make the switch to the left side, there will also (likely) be a top tier offensive tackle available for Dallas with the 14th overall selection.  While the team needs all the help it can get on defense, selecting an OT in the first round would instantly upgrade two positions.  DCT contributor Justin Shoemaker took some time to analyze the top three offensive tackle prospects in the 2012 NFL Draft.</em>

<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Matt Kalil (USC)</strong></span>

- sole reason Tyron Smith played right tackle for USC

-incredible footwork and very nimble for a  6’7'' guy. . .has the size to dominate in the power running game but the quickness to get out on counters, tosses and screens

- very comparable to Joe Thomas and Jake Long. . .has tools to be All-Pro

- unless Dallas moves up, he will be out of reach (likely No. 2 overall)

- Note from Jonathan: When I began studying Tyron Smith last year, I just assumed he was a left tackle.  After a couple plays I realized the player I was reviewing was white, so I had a pretty good idea I wasn't watching Smith.  I kept watching, though, because that player (Kalil) was absolutely dominant.  I can say I wholeheartedly believe Kalil is the top offensive tackle prospect I have seen. . .ever.  He's superior to Thomas and Long, in my opinions, and he will be an All-Pro for a decade.

<strong><span style="color: #a93022;">Jonathan Martin (Stanford)</span></strong>

- has protected Andrew Luck, but may have looked better than reality due to Luck's quick release (in much the same way Peyton Manning has made his average line look elite)

- surprisingly better in run blocking than pass protection

- versatile enough to play RT or LT; can set the edge, but still has agility to get to second level

- can play aggressively and with an attitude at times, but then becomes defensive and gives up too much ground to the pass rusher.

- seems to struggle when matched up on nine-technique players or 3-4 outside linebackers; thrives against "power" seven or five-technique rushers

- still has plenty of room to improve technique; would be instant upgrade over Free, even at right tackle

<span style="color: #ffcc00;"><strong>Riley Reiff (Iowa)</strong></span>

-typical Big 10 lineman, which means everyone loves the run blocking ability. . .will have more knocks on his pass protection

-can get a little stiff and awkward in both run blocking and pass protection; not a natural athlete like Kalil or Martin

-great awareness of the pocket and pushing the defender beyond it; will let defenders rush themselves out of play

-could be beast in various run blocking schemes, but may not fit as well for the Cowboys if they plan to incorporate more "finesse" runs with Murray and Jones

- no quit attitude until the whistle blows, play contagious to teammates (he's a Marc Colombo with skill)

-very much like fellow Hawkeye Bryan Bulaga,

- probably not enough value at No. 14

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 17: How Dallas Can Win the NFC East</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas in Week 17


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup'>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</a> <small>The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In addition to my article for the Times on <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/how-dallas-should-attack-giants-pass-defense/" target="_blank">how Dallas can beat Cover 2 Man Under</a></strong> this weekend in the Meadowlands, I also did a piece for the <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">Dallas Observer</a></strong>.  Head over there to check out my <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas</a>. </strong>Along with more analysis of the coverage which irritated Dallas in Week 14, I add a full game plan for the 'Boys.  Here are some of the highlights:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Don't blitz often.  Eli Manning's passer rating against the blitz is very comparable to that when four or less defenders rush him, but the Cowboys do not have the talent in the secondary to deal with a blitz that fails.  The team should be in the business of playing aggressively while still allowing for a chance to win the game late, and yielding quick scores due to unsuccessful blitz attempts won't help.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The 'Boys should mimic the Giants' Week 14 game plan by playing a lot of Cover 2 Man Under.  By keeping everything in front of them, the defense can maximize their chances of halting Hakeem Nicks and Victor Cruz and force either a tight end or a running back to beat them.  Although Brandon Jacobs wore down Dallas in the teams' last meeting, Ahmad Bradshaw is the more likely of the two to give Dallas fits this week.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Giants pass a lot out of double-tight formations, so the Cowboys cannot sell out to defend the run when they see the look.  The G-Men used a double-tight set 34 times in Week 14, so the 'Boys better be ready for it.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Cowboys, on the other hand, do tip their play calls via their formation, personnel package, or down-and-distance.  Jason Garrett could benefit from being a bit less predictable this week.  Garrett's predictability could be utilized to get the ball downfield with play action. But since 2009, Dallas quarterbacks have thrown for 20-plus yards on only 8.7 percent of play-action passes. And in two-plus years of passes, Garrett has called a play-action pass only eight times with 1-4 yards-to-go for a first down -- the situations when faking a run would actually work. Instead, he's called for a play-action look on 11 plays with 20-plus yards-to-go, when showing a running play is either an obvious decoy or hopeless.</strong></li>
</ul>
For additional analysis, <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">head over to the Observer</a></strong> and leave your comments there.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Grading the 'Boys"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the remainder of the season


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-defensive-linelinebackers/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Sean Lee has played better than Jay Ratliff, and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-times-final-2010-player-position-rankings/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Victor Butler and Martellus Bennett over Dez Bryant? Orlando Scandrick...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Believe it or not, the Dallas Cowboys are going to see a dramatic downgrade at guard with the loss of Montrae Holland to a torn biceps.  I have been critical of Holland in the past, providing him with a C+ grade in my <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/01/grading-the-boys-in-2010-part-vii-offensive-line/" target="_blank">2010 Offensive Line Grades</a></strong>.  Holland is not an incredible athlete and can appear slow-footed at times, often struggling with quick defensive tackles.  Nonetheless, he outplayed every Cowboys offensive linemen not named Tyron Smith in 2011.  Here is why. . .

Holland participated in 641 snaps this season, 361 of which were in pass protection.  He yielded eight pressures, one hit and two sacks in those snaps, good for a pressure rate of 2.21%.  While not at an elite level, that rate is still quite good.  As a comparison, right guard Kyle Kosier has a pressure rate of 2.85% this season.  That falls right in line with his pressure rate of 2.82% from 2010, providing a statistically significant sample size.  You can see the overall 2010 numbers below.

[caption id="attachment_8652" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="  "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-8652" title="2010 OL Pass Pro" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1-300x192.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="192" /></a>[/caption]

Many of you know I often praise Kosier's pass protection ability, and Holland has been superior to the veteran in 2011.  To get a broader sense of Holland's 2011 success, I took a look at the numbers of some of the top-graded guards (and middle tier guards) on <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>.

[caption id="attachment_9372" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9372" title="Guard Pressure Rates 2011" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011-300x158.png" alt="" width="300" height="158" /></a>[/caption]

You can see Holland's pressure rate, although not elite, was well above-average.  The #32 and #33 ranked guards at PFF surrendered pressure rates up to 46% higher than Holland's.  On top of that, I would grade Holland as the Cowboys' second-best run blocker all season if I was turning in my grades today.  I would provide him with a 'B' in both run blocking and pass protection, and that run blocking grade will undoubtedly be higher than all non-rookie offensive linemen in Big D.

Whether Derrick Dockery or Kevin Kowalski replaces Holland, the Cowboys will see a decline in production.  Holland was having a really strong 2011 campaign. . .and one which was being overlooked even by me.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking Cowboys&#8217; Improvements Over Last Decade</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using EPA to track the historic performance of the Dallas Cowboys


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/rob-ryans-defensive-fronts-the-46-psycho-and-cloud/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing Rob Ryan's defensive fronts, including the "46," "Psycho," and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/03/rob-ryans-zone-blitzes-how-teams-attack-fire-zones-and-how-dallas-can-respond/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>The title says it all....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/11/predictability-remains-in-jason-garretts-play-calling/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling'>Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling</a> <small>Analyzing predictability within Jason Garrett's play-calling and how the Cowboys...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Over at <strong><a href="http://wp.advancednflstats.com/yearstatvisualization.php" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a></strong>, a new feature has taken the world (my world) by storm.  If you click on the link, you can see the offensive and defensive "Expected Points Added" (a metric used to grade each play of a football game--a touchdown obviously has an EPA of six, while a 1st and Goal at the one-yard line is very close that number).  By tracking EPA, you can determine which teams are playing well, even if it is not reflected in their record, and which have simply been lucky.  For us here at DCT, we can take a look at the improvements of the Cowboys over the past decade.  Click on the link above to check out the graphs, or just scroll below.

[caption id="attachment_9304" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9304" title="DAL EPA per game" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-300x216.png" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a>[/caption]

In the first graph, you can see the Cowboys' historic offensive performance as compared to their defensive efficiency.  A few notes:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Since Jason Garrett has taken over as the offensive coordinator, the Cowboys have had well above-average offensive efficiency in every year except for 2008. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Their best season over the last decade, as you might guess, was in 2007.  This season has fallen right in line with 2006 and 2009. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Somewhat surprisingly, the best defenses in Dallas were in the first part of the 2000s.  Since Garrett has been in town, the Cowboys have been below-average on defense, in terms of EPA, every year.</strong></li>
</ul>
[caption id="attachment_9305" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9305" title="DAL EPA per game offense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense-300x105.png" alt="" width="300" height="105" /></a>[/caption]

Above, you can track the Cowboys' offensive improvements over the last 10+ years.  The most important aspect of this graph, in my view, is the fact that offensive performance is leveling out under Garrett.  Yes, the offense has been really solid during Garrett's tenure, but we see the team was moving in that direction since 2002.  There are two ways to look at this. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>The first is that Garrett is overrated as an offensive coordinator because the offense improved for multiple years since 2002 and their play has been stagnant since Garrett took over.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The other way to view the graph is that the Cowboys were bound to improve since their horrible 2002 campaign, and Garrett's ability to keep the offense around the 5.0 EPA/G mark is a testament to his ability. </strong></li>
</ul>
I think we are seeing more of the second explanation than the first.  If the Cowboys were consistently ranked No. 1 in offense each year, we wouldn't say Garrett has shown an inability to improve as a coordinator.  When teams are playing at either a very high or very low level, we are sure to see their play regress to the mean.  This is one reason why it should be a coach's dream to take over a 1-15 team.  Even if the coach does absolutely nothing right, the team will likely win more games the following season, and the coach will be viewed as "improving" his squad.  The fact that the offensive EPA has "leveled out" with Garrett here is a good thing.

Onto the defense. . .

[caption id="attachment_9306" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9306" title="DAL EPA per game defense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense-300x100.png" alt="" width="300" height="100" /></a>[/caption]

This is where the Cowboys need to improve to become a Championship-caliber football team.  Still, the "decline" in defensive production since the early part of the decade is not as drastic as it seems.  The Cowboys have become a far better offensive football team over the last five years because they have been able to throw the ball well.  In the early part of the 2000s, that wasn't the case.  The team opted to shorten games under head coach Bill Parcells, and that resulted in a superior EPA/G as compared to the current defense.

It is not the job of a coach to maximize offensive or defensive EPA, however, but rather to create the largest gap between their team and the opposition.  EPA is not an efficiency stat as we are using it here, so the "superior" EPA/G displayed by the early-2000s Cowboys does not <em>necessarily </em>represent a better defensive football team.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Film Obervations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14 loss to the Giants


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/assessing-football-strategy-is-running-the-football-often-necessary/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing the merits of short kickoffs, rushing the ball often,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/another-epic-collapse-thoughts-on-cowboys-week-14-loss-to-giants/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants'>Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants</a> <small>Why the Cowboys should have let the Giants score late,...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

One of my favorite things to do when I watch the Cowboys' games at home is track the team's win probability throughout the night using <a href="http://live.advancednflstats.com/index.php?gameid1=2011121113" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>' win probability charts.  Using a model which takes the down-and-distance, score, and time into account, ANS is able to determine the probability of a team winning a game at any point in time.  This information doesn't stem from estimates, but rather years of NFL data.

It is always fascinating to see how certain plays can influence a team's chances of winning.  Punts, for example, often result in a fairly significant drop in win probability because giving away possession is generally detrimental to a team.  Near the beginning of games, it takes a huge play to swing win probability in a major way.  A 4th and Goal defensive stop while up six points with 45 minutes to play might result in a big bump in win probability, but that same play would be much larger--perhaps from around 50% to 100%--if the play was the final one of the game.

Using the graph from Sunday night's game, I thought it would be fun to take a look at which plays affected the Cowboys' win probability most significantly.  Below, you can see the chart, along with 10 plays (or short sequences) which I have labeled as the most important. . .

[caption id="attachment_9270" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="CLICK TO ENLARGE "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9270 " title="Cowboys Giants Week 14 Win Probability" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability-300x191.png" alt="" width="300" height="191" /></a>[/caption]

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 1: 64-yard pass to Hakeem Nicks on 3rd and 7 at NYG 32; 53:44 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP (win probability) drops from 42 to 25 (-17%)</strong></li>
</ul>
A 17% drop in win probability in the middle of the first quarter is a big one.  This wouldn't have been much higher even if Nicks scored.  Poor coverage by Alan Ball.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 2: 26-yard gain by Felix Jones on 1st and 10 at NYG 42; 48:19 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 42 to 52 (+10%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The touchdown pass to John Phillips put Dallas on top, but Jones and a subsequent defensive holding penalty put the 'Boys in position to score.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 3: Felix Jones fumbles on 1st and 10 and ball recovered by NYG at DAL 14; 31:38 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 57 to 38 (-19%)</strong></li>
</ul>
This had the potential to be devastating to Dallas but they made the best of the situation by holding New York to a field goal and kicking one of their own before halftime.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 4: 47-yard touchdown pass to Mario Manningham on 3rd and 5 at DAL 47; 19:39 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 70 to 45 (-25%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Yielding a 47-yard score on a crucial 3rd down due to a broken coverage is heartbreaking.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 5: 74-yard pass to Laurent Robinson on 3rd and 10 at DAL 20; 13:17 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 38 to 66 (+28%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Other than the blocked field goal to end the game, this pass to Robinson was the most important one of the contest for Dallas.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 6: 15-yard completion to Mario Manningham on 4th and 3 at DAL 37; 8:24 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 78 to 56 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Here, you can see how game situation affects win probability.  The pass was only 15 yards long, but it came on a crucial 4th and 3 with just over eight minutes left to play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 7: Sean Lee interception on 3rd and 9 at DAL 21; 6:50 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 62 to 89 (+27%)</strong></li>
</ul>
I actually thought this would be more valuable to Dallas, but the fact that it came on a difficult 3rd and 9 (when New York's chances of converting were low) likely affected the jump in WP.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 8: Cowboys' three-and-out; 2:20 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 88 to 67 (-21%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Romo's infamous incompletion to Austin hurt Dallas in a big way.  If you assume Romo hits that pass 90% of the time and Dallas' wins 99% of games following a completion, the actual dip in WP would be closer to -31%.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 9: Holding on Abram Elam and 18-yard completion to Jake Ballard on 1st and 10 at DAL 19; 1:21 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 49 to 27 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The holding penalty on Elam has been overlooked.  DeMarcus Ware's offside penalty was also costly, but the full extent of it isn't factored into the WP chart because the errant snap and loss by the Giants isn't reflected in the play-by-play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 10: Blocked FG; 0:06 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 44 to &lt;1 (-43%)</strong></li>
</ul>
And the Cowboys' playoff chances drop from potentially around 90% with a win to now around 40% .

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Watch (Game Preview)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-review-romo-at-fault/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Thoughts on the Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with the New...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/cowboys-must-capitalize-on-takeaways/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why the Cowboys must capitalize when they force turnovers, and...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it (everyone, I'm assuming), I had an article published on The New York Times' football blog <em>The Fifth Down </em>titled <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/keys-to-defeating-dallas-from-a-cowboys-writer/" target="_blank">Keys to Defeating Dallas, From a Cowboys Writer</a></strong>.  You can (and should) click on the link to read it.

Before I receive the inevitable backlash for writing such blasphemous content, let me point out that this article is not much different than my traditional "DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas" weekly post.  Instead of explaining what Dallas needs to do for a win, however, I simply flipped the script.  "Protect Doug Free" would have been sound advice for Dallas this week, and you will find a corresponding "Attack Doug Free" bullet point in my New York Times piece.

You can find all of my thoughts on the Week 14 matchup in that post.  Here, I wanted to take a look at the broader picture, assessing both the Cowboys' and Giants' odds of making the playoffs after the contest.  There are a number of ways to do that.  In this article, I will conduct a schedule analysis, estimating the odds of each team winning their remaining games and determining how that relates to the subsequent importance of this particular matchup for each squad.

In the beginning of the season, the importance of the strength of a team's schedule is very overblown, and for a variety of reasons.  First, when comparing the schedules of two division opponents, the 14 games which are not head-to-head contain just two dissimilarities, i.e. the Giants and Cowboys had just two opponents which differed.  Secondly, the constant talent flux in the NFL makes preseason predictions in regards to a team's strength of schedule almost useless.  Who wold have thought the Raiders, Bengals, Bills, Lions, etc. would not be "easy wins" in 2011?  Lastly, the overall strength of a schedule tends to even out over the course of a 16-game season.  Simply put, preseason strength of schedule sucks as a method by which to analyze a team's playoff hopes.

By Week 14, however, a team's remaining schedule has a huge influence in their odds of making the playoffs.  Over the course of four games, it is certainly possible to have three or four strong/weak opponents, meaning the schedule doesn't necessarily have time to "even out."  Plus, we already know the relative strength of each NFL team, so estimating each team's win probability for a single game is far easier.

With all of that said, let's take a look at the Giants' and Cowboys' remaining schedules, along with the probability they win each game. . .

[caption id="attachment_9257" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9257" title="Dallas Cowboys New York Giants 2011 WP" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP-300x164.png" alt="" width="300" height="164" /></a>[/caption]

While the probabilities I used are "just" estimates, they are well-researched, solid estimates using advanced statistics gathered from <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/team-rankings-week-fourteen.html" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>.  Using their Generic Win Probability (the odds a team will win a game against a league-average opponent at a neutral site), we can estimate the chances of Dallas and New York winning each remaining game by combining the teams' GWP and factoring in home field advantage.  Thus, while I am "guessing" the odds of wins for the teams in their remaining contests, those probabilities are likely not too far from reality.

If we give each team a win total that directly correlates with their probabilities, i.e. the Cowboys' 54% chance of winning this week's matchup equates to ".54 wins," you can see the Cowboys' theoretical win total for the rest of the 2011 season is 2.37, while the Giants' is 2.40.  That difference is obviously not statistically significant, meaning the small errors which are undoubtedly contained within my win probability projections are surely enough to "make up for" this difference.

In other words, the Cowboys and Giants can be expected to win the same number of games moving forward.  Note that this conclusion does not mean the teams <em>will</em> win the same number of games, but rather that their chances of doing so are the most likely of all possible outcomes.

So what does this all mean for their playoff chances?  The incredible similarity between the teams and their win probability moving forward means that each's respective chances of making the playoffs, even after we factor in the schedule, are roughly the same as if they were both of league-average quality.

Think of it this way: if a team of the same quality of the Colts was 7-5 (like Dallas) and one with a talent level comparable to that of Green Bay was 6-6 (like New York), we'd still expect Green Bay's odds of making the playoffs to be greater due to their far higher win probability in each game.  The role of chance in that situation is less powerful than in the case of the 'Boys and G-Men.

In the latter comparison, we have two teams whose win probabilities for the remainder of the season are roughly equal.  This means that the chances of the Giants making the playoffs, taking their one-game deficit into account, are roughly the same as if we flipped a coin to determine the outcome of each contest.  Perform 10,000 coin flip simulations to allow the numbers to regress to the mean, and you will be left with each team's playoff chances.

Luckily, we have computers which can simulate seasons, so we don't need to waste time flipping a coin.  Over at <a href="http://files.nfl-forecast.com/archives/120" target="_blank">NFL-Forecast.com</a>, they have determined each team's chances of making the playoffs based on thousands of simulations with the GWP provided by Advanced NFL Stats.  If you head over there, you will see the odds of Dallas winning the NFC East are around 64%, with their overall playoff chances adding up to nearly 69% (meaning there is little chance they earn a Wild Card spot).  The Giants' odds are 35% to win the division and 36% to make the playoffs.

In terms of particular scenarios, the Cowboys will win the division if they beat the Giants in both of the clubs' remaining games.  If the Giants perform the same task, they will win the division as long as they do not lose both of their other two games <em>or</em> the Cowboys do not win both of their other games.  Simply put, if one squad wins both head-to-head games, they are effectively the NFC East champs.

If the more probable splitting of head-to-head games occurs, the Cowboys are in with one more win.  Let me break it down for you.  If the teams split and the Cowboys lose to Philly and beat Tampa Bay, for example, they would finish 9-7 and possess the same record as the Giants if they beat both the Redskins and Jets. Then, intricate tiebreakers would come into play.  As shown on <a href="http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures" target="_blank">NFL.com</a>, those are:
<ol>
	<li>Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference</li>
</ol>
The first tiebreaker would obviously end in a tie following a split.  If the Cowboys lose to either the Eagles and Bucs (and the Giants win against the 'Skins and Jets), the teams would finish 9-7 and both have a division record of 3-3, meaning the third tiebreaker would be a factor.  In common games (all but two, remember), the Giants and Cowboys would again be tied at 9-5 (including their head-to-head split).  Thus, the <em>fourth</em> tiebreaker is needed.  Here, the Cowboys have the advantage, as they will have a superior conference record following a split, no matter how the other games shake out.

Let's recap. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are in the playoffs.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Giants sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are almost assuredly in the playoffs.  They would miss out if they lose both remaining games and the Cowboys win both.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the teams split, the Cowboys are in if they win one of their other games.  If the Cowboys lose both of those games, the Giants are in if they win both of their remaining contests.</strong></li>
</ul>
For Dallas, all of the math equates to one simple conclusion: win this week, and you will almost certainly be NFC East champs.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Jason Garrett&#8217;s Late-Game Clock Management</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Jason Garrett deserves even more blame than he is receiving for his late-game clock management 


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/why-jason-garrett-was-wrong-to-run-late-vs-new-england/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why calling three straight runs in the fourth quarter against...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command'>Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command</a> <small>The title is self-explanatory. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/more-on-jason-garretts-decision-to-run-late-vs-pats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Responding to some reader comments on Jason Garrett's late-game play-calling...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it, I published a rather <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/">harsh criticism of Jason Garrett</a></strong> last night, explaining why his lack of courage is a hindrance to the Dallas Cowboys.  As long as Garrett is punting on 4th and 1 at the opponent's 35-yard line or displaying atrocious (if there was a word that was worse, I would us that) clock management skills, this team will cease to capitalize on their potential.

After time to contemplate the value of his decision to not call a timeout late in the fourth quarter of Sunday's loss, Garrett must surely see the error of his ways, right?  Nope.  <a href="http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/_/id/7317155/dallas-cowboys-jason-garrett-explains-late-game-clock-management-loss-arizona-cardinals" target="_blank">Said Garrett</a>:
<blockquote>We very well could have taken a timeout there. We felt like we were in field-goal range. We have yard lines that we use as guidelines before the game. We felt like we were in range at that point.  Tony had them on the line of scrimmage quickly, so we went ahead and clocked it and used that as a timeout. You see so many situations where you have negative plays in those situations. We felt like we were in (Dan Bailey's) range to give him a chance to kick the game-winner. . .We felt pretty good about where we were. Once you get to that 30-yard line we felt like that was a pretty good opportunity for us.</blockquote>
You cannot be serious, Jason.  There were 23 seconds left on the clock when the Cowboys obtained a first down at the Cardinals' 31-yard line, so Garrett's insinuation that the offense clocked the ball "quickly" is erroneous.  On top of that, spiking the ball "as a timeout" is the entire reason no one in their right mind can understand what was going through your own yesterday.

With two timeouts in hand, how in the world do you not use one with 23 seconds on the clock?  Even if you decide you do not want to try to advance the ball down the field, why not at least give yourself the option?  If you (mistakenly) want to settle for a 49-yard field goal attempt, why not run Romo to the middle of the field, let the clock run down, then attempt the field goal with your kicker in a better spot?

Of course, the no-brainer coaching decision is to immediately call timeout and work harder to get the ball downfield.  Instead, Garrett coached scared, disregarding the numbers in favor of not risking a big loss.  But what are "the numbers"?  Let's see. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>On average, a kicker has a <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/11/just-for-kicks.html" target="_blank">65% chance of converting</a> a 49-yard field goal try.
</strong></li>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys gained six more yards, those odds increase to 75%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys had passed the football, there chances of giving up a sack (based on season averages) were 4.0%.  In reality, they were lower because this wasn't a "normal" game situation and Romo would be more willing to throw the ball away at the first sign of trouble than on, say, a 1st and 10 in the first quarter.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>A loss of six yards would equate to a field goal try on which kickers have displayed around 50% accuracy. </strong></li>
</ul>
For Garrett's decision to let the clock tick down to be correct, we would have to assume the Cowboys' offense has less than a 6% chance of gaining six yards on a passing play.  Anyone think that is the case?  Me neither.

One of the major mistakes Garrett made was in his binary thinking regarding field goals.  Brian Burke of Advanced NFL Stats<a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/unicorns-tooth-fairy-cowboys-and-field.html" target="_blank"> pointed that out</a>, discussing Garrett's black-and-white ideas:
<blockquote>Also, note Garrett's conception of "field goal range." He has a yard line established before the game. That kind of thinking assumes a yes-or-no, black-and-white idea of a field goal attempt. Either you're in range or you're not. If we're in "range", and the kicker misses, well, that's his fault. This is a failure to think in probabilistic terms.</blockquote>
The sort of false dichotomy Garrett displayed with his thinking shows he either does not understand statistics at a fundamental level, or he understands them and coaches to limit the blame which could be placed upon him after defeat, instead exposing his players to it.  I think it is the latter.  Unfortunately for Dallas, cowards don't win Super Bowls.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tony Romo Directional Passing: Why Dallas Should Throw Deep More Often</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas in Week 17


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup'>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</a> <small>The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In addition to my article for the Times on <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/how-dallas-should-attack-giants-pass-defense/" target="_blank">how Dallas can beat Cover 2 Man Under</a></strong> this weekend in the Meadowlands, I also did a piece for the <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">Dallas Observer</a></strong>.  Head over there to check out my <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas</a>. </strong>Along with more analysis of the coverage which irritated Dallas in Week 14, I add a full game plan for the 'Boys.  Here are some of the highlights:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Don't blitz often.  Eli Manning's passer rating against the blitz is very comparable to that when four or less defenders rush him, but the Cowboys do not have the talent in the secondary to deal with a blitz that fails.  The team should be in the business of playing aggressively while still allowing for a chance to win the game late, and yielding quick scores due to unsuccessful blitz attempts won't help.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The 'Boys should mimic the Giants' Week 14 game plan by playing a lot of Cover 2 Man Under.  By keeping everything in front of them, the defense can maximize their chances of halting Hakeem Nicks and Victor Cruz and force either a tight end or a running back to beat them.  Although Brandon Jacobs wore down Dallas in the teams' last meeting, Ahmad Bradshaw is the more likely of the two to give Dallas fits this week.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Giants pass a lot out of double-tight formations, so the Cowboys cannot sell out to defend the run when they see the look.  The G-Men used a double-tight set 34 times in Week 14, so the 'Boys better be ready for it.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Cowboys, on the other hand, do tip their play calls via their formation, personnel package, or down-and-distance.  Jason Garrett could benefit from being a bit less predictable this week.  Garrett's predictability could be utilized to get the ball downfield with play action. But since 2009, Dallas quarterbacks have thrown for 20-plus yards on only 8.7 percent of play-action passes. And in two-plus years of passes, Garrett has called a play-action pass only eight times with 1-4 yards-to-go for a first down -- the situations when faking a run would actually work. Instead, he's called for a play-action look on 11 plays with 20-plus yards-to-go, when showing a running play is either an obvious decoy or hopeless.</strong></li>
</ul>
For additional analysis, <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">head over to the Observer</a></strong> and leave your comments there.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys Times &#187; Film Study/Stat Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/film-studystats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com</link>
	<description>Unrivaled Dallas Cowboys Info 24/7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should the Cowboys Make a Run at G Carl Nicks?</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl Nicks will be the top free agent guard on the market this offseason.  Should Dallas jump on him?


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think'>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</a> <small>Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats'>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</a> <small>Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In the past week or so, I have written extensively on the Cowboys' offensive line.  In my last post (a look at some <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/">interesting offensive statistics</a></strong> from 2011), I hit you with these numbers:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn’t start in 2012, although he probably will.</strong></li>
</ul>
It is pretty clear the interior line is in disarray in Dallas, and something needs to be done to fix it.  I suggested <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-where-should-doug-free-play/">moving Doug Free to right guard</a></strong> and drafting a right tackle in the first round (with Tyron Smith obviously kicking to the left side).  There are some pros and cons to that plan, but I like it because it instantly upgrades two spots.

Others have suggested the Cowboys might make a run at impending <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4689477/could-cowboys-make-play-for-carl-nicks?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">free agent guard Carl Nicks</a>, though.  Although Jerry Jones has refrained from signing big-money free agents since Jason Garrett has taken over as head coach, this is one I actually believe the 'Boys should jump all over.  Here's why.

Nicks will command a hefty contract, but guards are continually underpaid in the NFL.  He won't garner nearly as much money as an elite left tackle, but his impact (for Dallas, especially) isn't that much less than his tackle counterpart.  We saw how much a weak interior line can affect an offense in 2011.  Don't let it happen again in 2012.

Nicks was the No. 2 ranked guard by <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>, yielding only eight pressures all season.  He had the second-highest pass blocking efficiency in the NFL, allowing a sack, hit or pressure on just 1.4% of pass plays.  Nicks is a dominant run blocker as well.  Saints running backs averaged a ridiculous 5.96 yards-per-carry when Nicks was at the point-of-attack this season.  Compare those numbers with the Cowboys' interior linemen (above).  Dallas backs averaged less than four yards per carry when running behind Holland in 2011, and he's a player whose run blocking I praised as solid.

Personally, I don't think the acquisition of Nicks means the team should automatically forget about switching Free's position.  A tackle-to-guard transition might not seem as appealing with Nicks in town, but an offensive line of Smith, Nicks, Kosier (who can play center), Free, and a rookie right tackle looks pretty damn good to me.  Throw in Holland and Phil Costa as backups, and you're all set.

Either way, Nicks is a player who the Cowboys should seriously consider.  He will demand a pretty penny, but guards are repeatedly undervalued.  He's a player on whom to break the bank this offseason.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is an elite quarterback, the Cowboys' running backs need to improve in pass pro, Montrae Holland played very well in 2011, and Phil Costa shouldn't start in 2012


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/how-dallas-cowboys-player-rankings-should-affect-2011-draft-prep/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Player and position rankings for the Dallas Cowboys in 2010,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-skill-position-grades-through-week-7/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7'>Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7</a> <small>Grades for Tony Romo, DeMarco Murray, Miles Austin and others...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

I am going to begin my 2012 Draft coverage early this year, and you can expect it to be superb. . .<strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/draft/">as per usual</a></strong>.  Between those articles you can also expect to find stat analysis of the Cowboys 2011 season.  Below, I have pasted some interesting numbers from both <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/signature.php?tab=signature&amp;pos=qbr" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a> and my own Excel spreadsheets.  Similar defensive statistics to come.

<strong style="color: #000080;">Tony Romo</strong>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo finished the season fourth in the NFL in passer rating at 102.5, behind only Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees and Tom Brady.  That includes a 104.4 rating in the fourth quarter. . .not bad for a "choke artist." </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Taking away drops, spikes and throw aways, Romo's completion percentage was 73.5%. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>On deep passes of 20+ yards, Romo completed 54.8% of his attempts.  That was second in the league to Aaron Rodgers, but only 11.9% of Romo's passes traveled that long--good for only 13th in the league.  He threw 13 touchdowns and only two picks on deep throws.  I've been saying for years the <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tony-romo-directional-passing-why-dallas-should-throw-deep-more-often/">Cowboys would benefit immensely from more deep passes</a>. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo was under pressure on 30.7% of dropbacks, which was 13th highest in league, but completed 56.7% of his passes in these situations.  That was second-best in the NFL to only Drew Brees<span style="color: #000080;">.</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Dez Bryant, Miles Austin and Laurent Robinson</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys quarterbacks had a 110.8 passer rating when throwing to Dez Bryant, which was the 16th-highest of any receiver in the NFL.  Romo threw three of his interceptions when targeting Bryant.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>I have seen some criticisms of Miles Austin lately, even from "expert" Dallas-area writers.  Don't listen to it.  Austin's only problem has been staying healthy, as Romo posted a 117.8 rating when throwing to Austin, including zero interceptions.  That rating is good for 11th among all receivers.  Austin is an elite wide receiver who will have a monster 2012 season if he stays on the field.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Puzzling to me are Austin's drops.  After a 2010 season in which he struggled with dropping passes, Austin let four more get through his hands this season.  That isn't an enormous amount, but it was 8.5% of catchable passes and good for just 37th in the NFL.  I think this is a small sample size at work, though, as just one less drop would shoot Austin up to 23rd.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Meanwhile, Bryant tallied only one drop all season--second-best in the NFL of any receiver who played 25% of his team's snaps.  Only Golden Tate caught every pass possible.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Laurent Robinson caught 58.8% of deep passes (20+ yards) thrown his way, good for third in NFL.  Austin was 10th at 50.0%, and Bryant 29th at 36.8%.  These numbers are misleading, as Robinson is very rarely the first read on plays.  If he is thrown to, chances are he's fairly open.  Bryant gets balls in double-coverage, and so we'd expect his deep catch rate to be lower.  Larry Fitzgerald, for example, was just 24th in the NFL at 41.2%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Robinson tallied 2.18 yards per route--the top number on the Cowboys.</strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones were both solid at avoiding defenders in 2011, tallying 3.01 and 2.98 yards-after-contact/attempt.  Those rates were 10th and 11th in the league.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray had 36.8% of his yardage come on runs of 15+ yards, which was the 12th-highest rate in the NFL.  Jones was 31st at 26.4%.  Again, this stat can be misleading.  While you always want big plays, a really high "big run rate" can be an indicator that a running back will regress to the mean the following season, rushing for fewer big plays and seeing a decrease in both total yards and yards per attempt.  Murray and Jones are both breakaway players, and I'd expect both of them to be around 35% in any given season.  As an example of how much these numbers can fluctuate, consider that Jones saw 44.0% of his yards come on big plays in 2009, compared to just 15.3% last season.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones were 24th and 26th, respectively, in catch rate at 89.7% and 89.2%</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones both need to improve in pass protection.  Jones allowed a pressure, hit or sack on 6.3% of snaps he was in pass pro.  This was just the 41st-best mark in the NFL.  Murray's 9.7% number came in at 62nd in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Jason Witten dropped 3.61% of balls thrown his way (three total), good for 10th in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>13.5% of Witten's snaps came in the slot.  That was just the 17th-highest percentage for tight ends, and the rate was well behind the top 10 (all of whom played 25+% snaps in slot). </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten was 12th in yards per route at 1.69.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten blocked on only 9.4% of pass plays, well below his rate in past seasons.  He was 18th in the NFL with 3.9% of snaps resulting in a pressure, hit or sack.  Martellus Bennett was 17th, with 3.8% of his snaps resulting in some sort of pressure.  It confirms the notion that Witten and Bennett are similar in pass protection (although Bennett is far superior as a run blocker).  Bennett blocked on 20.1% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Offensive Line</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The entire offensive line was 14th overall in pass blocking efficiency, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on 18.5% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Tyron Smith was the league's 14th most efficient tackle in terms of pass protection, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on just 4.0% of pass plays.  Free was 48th with 6.3%.  He also allowed 10 sacks, which was sixth-worst in the NFL. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn't start in 2012, although he probably will. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Bill Nagy allowed pressure on 4.1% of pass plays, good for 41st in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyzing the Top Tier Offensive Tackles in 2012 NFL Draft</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scouting reports on Matt Kalil, Jonathan Martin and Riley Reiff


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/dallas-cowboys-draft-usc-ot-tyron-smith-no-9-overall/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Initial reactions to the Cowboys selecting USC offensive tackle Tyron...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-potential-draft-pick-in-2011-anthony-castonzo-ot-boston-college/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Scouting report on Boston College offensive tackle Anthony Castonzo, including...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Justin Shoemaker

<em>Editor's Note: A few days ago, we had an article published in the Dallas Observer which argued <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2012/01/cowboys-giants-recap.php" target="_blank">why Doug Free should be moved to guard</a></strong>.  In addition to his contract being a sunk cost and rookie right tackle Tyron Smith being ready to make the switch to the left side, there will also (likely) be a top tier offensive tackle available for Dallas with the 14th overall selection.  While the team needs all the help it can get on defense, selecting an OT in the first round would instantly upgrade two positions.  DCT contributor Justin Shoemaker took some time to analyze the top three offensive tackle prospects in the 2012 NFL Draft.</em>

<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Matt Kalil (USC)</strong></span>

- sole reason Tyron Smith played right tackle for USC

-incredible footwork and very nimble for a  6’7'' guy. . .has the size to dominate in the power running game but the quickness to get out on counters, tosses and screens

- very comparable to Joe Thomas and Jake Long. . .has tools to be All-Pro

- unless Dallas moves up, he will be out of reach (likely No. 2 overall)

- Note from Jonathan: When I began studying Tyron Smith last year, I just assumed he was a left tackle.  After a couple plays I realized the player I was reviewing was white, so I had a pretty good idea I wasn't watching Smith.  I kept watching, though, because that player (Kalil) was absolutely dominant.  I can say I wholeheartedly believe Kalil is the top offensive tackle prospect I have seen. . .ever.  He's superior to Thomas and Long, in my opinions, and he will be an All-Pro for a decade.

<strong><span style="color: #a93022;">Jonathan Martin (Stanford)</span></strong>

- has protected Andrew Luck, but may have looked better than reality due to Luck's quick release (in much the same way Peyton Manning has made his average line look elite)

- surprisingly better in run blocking than pass protection

- versatile enough to play RT or LT; can set the edge, but still has agility to get to second level

- can play aggressively and with an attitude at times, but then becomes defensive and gives up too much ground to the pass rusher.

- seems to struggle when matched up on nine-technique players or 3-4 outside linebackers; thrives against "power" seven or five-technique rushers

- still has plenty of room to improve technique; would be instant upgrade over Free, even at right tackle

<span style="color: #ffcc00;"><strong>Riley Reiff (Iowa)</strong></span>

-typical Big 10 lineman, which means everyone loves the run blocking ability. . .will have more knocks on his pass protection

-can get a little stiff and awkward in both run blocking and pass protection; not a natural athlete like Kalil or Martin

-great awareness of the pocket and pushing the defender beyond it; will let defenders rush themselves out of play

-could be beast in various run blocking schemes, but may not fit as well for the Cowboys if they plan to incorporate more "finesse" runs with Murray and Jones

- no quit attitude until the whistle blows, play contagious to teammates (he's a Marc Colombo with skill)

-very much like fellow Hawkeye Bryan Bulaga,

- probably not enough value at No. 14

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 17: How Dallas Can Win the NFC East</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas in Week 17


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup'>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</a> <small>The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In addition to my article for the Times on <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/how-dallas-should-attack-giants-pass-defense/" target="_blank">how Dallas can beat Cover 2 Man Under</a></strong> this weekend in the Meadowlands, I also did a piece for the <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">Dallas Observer</a></strong>.  Head over there to check out my <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas</a>. </strong>Along with more analysis of the coverage which irritated Dallas in Week 14, I add a full game plan for the 'Boys.  Here are some of the highlights:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Don't blitz often.  Eli Manning's passer rating against the blitz is very comparable to that when four or less defenders rush him, but the Cowboys do not have the talent in the secondary to deal with a blitz that fails.  The team should be in the business of playing aggressively while still allowing for a chance to win the game late, and yielding quick scores due to unsuccessful blitz attempts won't help.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The 'Boys should mimic the Giants' Week 14 game plan by playing a lot of Cover 2 Man Under.  By keeping everything in front of them, the defense can maximize their chances of halting Hakeem Nicks and Victor Cruz and force either a tight end or a running back to beat them.  Although Brandon Jacobs wore down Dallas in the teams' last meeting, Ahmad Bradshaw is the more likely of the two to give Dallas fits this week.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Giants pass a lot out of double-tight formations, so the Cowboys cannot sell out to defend the run when they see the look.  The G-Men used a double-tight set 34 times in Week 14, so the 'Boys better be ready for it.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Cowboys, on the other hand, do tip their play calls via their formation, personnel package, or down-and-distance.  Jason Garrett could benefit from being a bit less predictable this week.  Garrett's predictability could be utilized to get the ball downfield with play action. But since 2009, Dallas quarterbacks have thrown for 20-plus yards on only 8.7 percent of play-action passes. And in two-plus years of passes, Garrett has called a play-action pass only eight times with 1-4 yards-to-go for a first down -- the situations when faking a run would actually work. Instead, he's called for a play-action look on 11 plays with 20-plus yards-to-go, when showing a running play is either an obvious decoy or hopeless.</strong></li>
</ul>
For additional analysis, <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">head over to the Observer</a></strong> and leave your comments there.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Grading the 'Boys"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the remainder of the season


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-defensive-linelinebackers/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Sean Lee has played better than Jay Ratliff, and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-times-final-2010-player-position-rankings/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Victor Butler and Martellus Bennett over Dez Bryant? Orlando Scandrick...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Believe it or not, the Dallas Cowboys are going to see a dramatic downgrade at guard with the loss of Montrae Holland to a torn biceps.  I have been critical of Holland in the past, providing him with a C+ grade in my <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/01/grading-the-boys-in-2010-part-vii-offensive-line/" target="_blank">2010 Offensive Line Grades</a></strong>.  Holland is not an incredible athlete and can appear slow-footed at times, often struggling with quick defensive tackles.  Nonetheless, he outplayed every Cowboys offensive linemen not named Tyron Smith in 2011.  Here is why. . .

Holland participated in 641 snaps this season, 361 of which were in pass protection.  He yielded eight pressures, one hit and two sacks in those snaps, good for a pressure rate of 2.21%.  While not at an elite level, that rate is still quite good.  As a comparison, right guard Kyle Kosier has a pressure rate of 2.85% this season.  That falls right in line with his pressure rate of 2.82% from 2010, providing a statistically significant sample size.  You can see the overall 2010 numbers below.

[caption id="attachment_8652" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="  "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-8652" title="2010 OL Pass Pro" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1-300x192.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="192" /></a>[/caption]

Many of you know I often praise Kosier's pass protection ability, and Holland has been superior to the veteran in 2011.  To get a broader sense of Holland's 2011 success, I took a look at the numbers of some of the top-graded guards (and middle tier guards) on <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>.

[caption id="attachment_9372" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9372" title="Guard Pressure Rates 2011" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011-300x158.png" alt="" width="300" height="158" /></a>[/caption]

You can see Holland's pressure rate, although not elite, was well above-average.  The #32 and #33 ranked guards at PFF surrendered pressure rates up to 46% higher than Holland's.  On top of that, I would grade Holland as the Cowboys' second-best run blocker all season if I was turning in my grades today.  I would provide him with a 'B' in both run blocking and pass protection, and that run blocking grade will undoubtedly be higher than all non-rookie offensive linemen in Big D.

Whether Derrick Dockery or Kevin Kowalski replaces Holland, the Cowboys will see a decline in production.  Holland was having a really strong 2011 campaign. . .and one which was being overlooked even by me.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking Cowboys&#8217; Improvements Over Last Decade</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using EPA to track the historic performance of the Dallas Cowboys


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/rob-ryans-defensive-fronts-the-46-psycho-and-cloud/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing Rob Ryan's defensive fronts, including the "46," "Psycho," and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/03/rob-ryans-zone-blitzes-how-teams-attack-fire-zones-and-how-dallas-can-respond/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>The title says it all....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/11/predictability-remains-in-jason-garretts-play-calling/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling'>Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling</a> <small>Analyzing predictability within Jason Garrett's play-calling and how the Cowboys...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Over at <strong><a href="http://wp.advancednflstats.com/yearstatvisualization.php" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a></strong>, a new feature has taken the world (my world) by storm.  If you click on the link, you can see the offensive and defensive "Expected Points Added" (a metric used to grade each play of a football game--a touchdown obviously has an EPA of six, while a 1st and Goal at the one-yard line is very close that number).  By tracking EPA, you can determine which teams are playing well, even if it is not reflected in their record, and which have simply been lucky.  For us here at DCT, we can take a look at the improvements of the Cowboys over the past decade.  Click on the link above to check out the graphs, or just scroll below.

[caption id="attachment_9304" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9304" title="DAL EPA per game" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-300x216.png" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a>[/caption]

In the first graph, you can see the Cowboys' historic offensive performance as compared to their defensive efficiency.  A few notes:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Since Jason Garrett has taken over as the offensive coordinator, the Cowboys have had well above-average offensive efficiency in every year except for 2008. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Their best season over the last decade, as you might guess, was in 2007.  This season has fallen right in line with 2006 and 2009. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Somewhat surprisingly, the best defenses in Dallas were in the first part of the 2000s.  Since Garrett has been in town, the Cowboys have been below-average on defense, in terms of EPA, every year.</strong></li>
</ul>
[caption id="attachment_9305" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9305" title="DAL EPA per game offense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense-300x105.png" alt="" width="300" height="105" /></a>[/caption]

Above, you can track the Cowboys' offensive improvements over the last 10+ years.  The most important aspect of this graph, in my view, is the fact that offensive performance is leveling out under Garrett.  Yes, the offense has been really solid during Garrett's tenure, but we see the team was moving in that direction since 2002.  There are two ways to look at this. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>The first is that Garrett is overrated as an offensive coordinator because the offense improved for multiple years since 2002 and their play has been stagnant since Garrett took over.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The other way to view the graph is that the Cowboys were bound to improve since their horrible 2002 campaign, and Garrett's ability to keep the offense around the 5.0 EPA/G mark is a testament to his ability. </strong></li>
</ul>
I think we are seeing more of the second explanation than the first.  If the Cowboys were consistently ranked No. 1 in offense each year, we wouldn't say Garrett has shown an inability to improve as a coordinator.  When teams are playing at either a very high or very low level, we are sure to see their play regress to the mean.  This is one reason why it should be a coach's dream to take over a 1-15 team.  Even if the coach does absolutely nothing right, the team will likely win more games the following season, and the coach will be viewed as "improving" his squad.  The fact that the offensive EPA has "leveled out" with Garrett here is a good thing.

Onto the defense. . .

[caption id="attachment_9306" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9306" title="DAL EPA per game defense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense-300x100.png" alt="" width="300" height="100" /></a>[/caption]

This is where the Cowboys need to improve to become a Championship-caliber football team.  Still, the "decline" in defensive production since the early part of the decade is not as drastic as it seems.  The Cowboys have become a far better offensive football team over the last five years because they have been able to throw the ball well.  In the early part of the 2000s, that wasn't the case.  The team opted to shorten games under head coach Bill Parcells, and that resulted in a superior EPA/G as compared to the current defense.

It is not the job of a coach to maximize offensive or defensive EPA, however, but rather to create the largest gap between their team and the opposition.  EPA is not an efficiency stat as we are using it here, so the "superior" EPA/G displayed by the early-2000s Cowboys does not <em>necessarily </em>represent a better defensive football team.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Film Obervations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14 loss to the Giants


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/assessing-football-strategy-is-running-the-football-often-necessary/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing the merits of short kickoffs, rushing the ball often,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/another-epic-collapse-thoughts-on-cowboys-week-14-loss-to-giants/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants'>Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants</a> <small>Why the Cowboys should have let the Giants score late,...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

One of my favorite things to do when I watch the Cowboys' games at home is track the team's win probability throughout the night using <a href="http://live.advancednflstats.com/index.php?gameid1=2011121113" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>' win probability charts.  Using a model which takes the down-and-distance, score, and time into account, ANS is able to determine the probability of a team winning a game at any point in time.  This information doesn't stem from estimates, but rather years of NFL data.

It is always fascinating to see how certain plays can influence a team's chances of winning.  Punts, for example, often result in a fairly significant drop in win probability because giving away possession is generally detrimental to a team.  Near the beginning of games, it takes a huge play to swing win probability in a major way.  A 4th and Goal defensive stop while up six points with 45 minutes to play might result in a big bump in win probability, but that same play would be much larger--perhaps from around 50% to 100%--if the play was the final one of the game.

Using the graph from Sunday night's game, I thought it would be fun to take a look at which plays affected the Cowboys' win probability most significantly.  Below, you can see the chart, along with 10 plays (or short sequences) which I have labeled as the most important. . .

[caption id="attachment_9270" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="CLICK TO ENLARGE "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9270 " title="Cowboys Giants Week 14 Win Probability" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability-300x191.png" alt="" width="300" height="191" /></a>[/caption]

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 1: 64-yard pass to Hakeem Nicks on 3rd and 7 at NYG 32; 53:44 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP (win probability) drops from 42 to 25 (-17%)</strong></li>
</ul>
A 17% drop in win probability in the middle of the first quarter is a big one.  This wouldn't have been much higher even if Nicks scored.  Poor coverage by Alan Ball.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 2: 26-yard gain by Felix Jones on 1st and 10 at NYG 42; 48:19 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 42 to 52 (+10%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The touchdown pass to John Phillips put Dallas on top, but Jones and a subsequent defensive holding penalty put the 'Boys in position to score.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 3: Felix Jones fumbles on 1st and 10 and ball recovered by NYG at DAL 14; 31:38 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 57 to 38 (-19%)</strong></li>
</ul>
This had the potential to be devastating to Dallas but they made the best of the situation by holding New York to a field goal and kicking one of their own before halftime.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 4: 47-yard touchdown pass to Mario Manningham on 3rd and 5 at DAL 47; 19:39 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 70 to 45 (-25%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Yielding a 47-yard score on a crucial 3rd down due to a broken coverage is heartbreaking.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 5: 74-yard pass to Laurent Robinson on 3rd and 10 at DAL 20; 13:17 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 38 to 66 (+28%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Other than the blocked field goal to end the game, this pass to Robinson was the most important one of the contest for Dallas.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 6: 15-yard completion to Mario Manningham on 4th and 3 at DAL 37; 8:24 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 78 to 56 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Here, you can see how game situation affects win probability.  The pass was only 15 yards long, but it came on a crucial 4th and 3 with just over eight minutes left to play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 7: Sean Lee interception on 3rd and 9 at DAL 21; 6:50 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 62 to 89 (+27%)</strong></li>
</ul>
I actually thought this would be more valuable to Dallas, but the fact that it came on a difficult 3rd and 9 (when New York's chances of converting were low) likely affected the jump in WP.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 8: Cowboys' three-and-out; 2:20 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 88 to 67 (-21%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Romo's infamous incompletion to Austin hurt Dallas in a big way.  If you assume Romo hits that pass 90% of the time and Dallas' wins 99% of games following a completion, the actual dip in WP would be closer to -31%.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 9: Holding on Abram Elam and 18-yard completion to Jake Ballard on 1st and 10 at DAL 19; 1:21 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 49 to 27 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The holding penalty on Elam has been overlooked.  DeMarcus Ware's offside penalty was also costly, but the full extent of it isn't factored into the WP chart because the errant snap and loss by the Giants isn't reflected in the play-by-play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 10: Blocked FG; 0:06 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 44 to &lt;1 (-43%)</strong></li>
</ul>
And the Cowboys' playoff chances drop from potentially around 90% with a win to now around 40% .

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Watch (Game Preview)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-review-romo-at-fault/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Thoughts on the Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with the New...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/cowboys-must-capitalize-on-takeaways/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why the Cowboys must capitalize when they force turnovers, and...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it (everyone, I'm assuming), I had an article published on The New York Times' football blog <em>The Fifth Down </em>titled <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/keys-to-defeating-dallas-from-a-cowboys-writer/" target="_blank">Keys to Defeating Dallas, From a Cowboys Writer</a></strong>.  You can (and should) click on the link to read it.

Before I receive the inevitable backlash for writing such blasphemous content, let me point out that this article is not much different than my traditional "DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas" weekly post.  Instead of explaining what Dallas needs to do for a win, however, I simply flipped the script.  "Protect Doug Free" would have been sound advice for Dallas this week, and you will find a corresponding "Attack Doug Free" bullet point in my New York Times piece.

You can find all of my thoughts on the Week 14 matchup in that post.  Here, I wanted to take a look at the broader picture, assessing both the Cowboys' and Giants' odds of making the playoffs after the contest.  There are a number of ways to do that.  In this article, I will conduct a schedule analysis, estimating the odds of each team winning their remaining games and determining how that relates to the subsequent importance of this particular matchup for each squad.

In the beginning of the season, the importance of the strength of a team's schedule is very overblown, and for a variety of reasons.  First, when comparing the schedules of two division opponents, the 14 games which are not head-to-head contain just two dissimilarities, i.e. the Giants and Cowboys had just two opponents which differed.  Secondly, the constant talent flux in the NFL makes preseason predictions in regards to a team's strength of schedule almost useless.  Who wold have thought the Raiders, Bengals, Bills, Lions, etc. would not be "easy wins" in 2011?  Lastly, the overall strength of a schedule tends to even out over the course of a 16-game season.  Simply put, preseason strength of schedule sucks as a method by which to analyze a team's playoff hopes.

By Week 14, however, a team's remaining schedule has a huge influence in their odds of making the playoffs.  Over the course of four games, it is certainly possible to have three or four strong/weak opponents, meaning the schedule doesn't necessarily have time to "even out."  Plus, we already know the relative strength of each NFL team, so estimating each team's win probability for a single game is far easier.

With all of that said, let's take a look at the Giants' and Cowboys' remaining schedules, along with the probability they win each game. . .

[caption id="attachment_9257" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9257" title="Dallas Cowboys New York Giants 2011 WP" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP-300x164.png" alt="" width="300" height="164" /></a>[/caption]

While the probabilities I used are "just" estimates, they are well-researched, solid estimates using advanced statistics gathered from <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/team-rankings-week-fourteen.html" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>.  Using their Generic Win Probability (the odds a team will win a game against a league-average opponent at a neutral site), we can estimate the chances of Dallas and New York winning each remaining game by combining the teams' GWP and factoring in home field advantage.  Thus, while I am "guessing" the odds of wins for the teams in their remaining contests, those probabilities are likely not too far from reality.

If we give each team a win total that directly correlates with their probabilities, i.e. the Cowboys' 54% chance of winning this week's matchup equates to ".54 wins," you can see the Cowboys' theoretical win total for the rest of the 2011 season is 2.37, while the Giants' is 2.40.  That difference is obviously not statistically significant, meaning the small errors which are undoubtedly contained within my win probability projections are surely enough to "make up for" this difference.

In other words, the Cowboys and Giants can be expected to win the same number of games moving forward.  Note that this conclusion does not mean the teams <em>will</em> win the same number of games, but rather that their chances of doing so are the most likely of all possible outcomes.

So what does this all mean for their playoff chances?  The incredible similarity between the teams and their win probability moving forward means that each's respective chances of making the playoffs, even after we factor in the schedule, are roughly the same as if they were both of league-average quality.

Think of it this way: if a team of the same quality of the Colts was 7-5 (like Dallas) and one with a talent level comparable to that of Green Bay was 6-6 (like New York), we'd still expect Green Bay's odds of making the playoffs to be greater due to their far higher win probability in each game.  The role of chance in that situation is less powerful than in the case of the 'Boys and G-Men.

In the latter comparison, we have two teams whose win probabilities for the remainder of the season are roughly equal.  This means that the chances of the Giants making the playoffs, taking their one-game deficit into account, are roughly the same as if we flipped a coin to determine the outcome of each contest.  Perform 10,000 coin flip simulations to allow the numbers to regress to the mean, and you will be left with each team's playoff chances.

Luckily, we have computers which can simulate seasons, so we don't need to waste time flipping a coin.  Over at <a href="http://files.nfl-forecast.com/archives/120" target="_blank">NFL-Forecast.com</a>, they have determined each team's chances of making the playoffs based on thousands of simulations with the GWP provided by Advanced NFL Stats.  If you head over there, you will see the odds of Dallas winning the NFC East are around 64%, with their overall playoff chances adding up to nearly 69% (meaning there is little chance they earn a Wild Card spot).  The Giants' odds are 35% to win the division and 36% to make the playoffs.

In terms of particular scenarios, the Cowboys will win the division if they beat the Giants in both of the clubs' remaining games.  If the Giants perform the same task, they will win the division as long as they do not lose both of their other two games <em>or</em> the Cowboys do not win both of their other games.  Simply put, if one squad wins both head-to-head games, they are effectively the NFC East champs.

If the more probable splitting of head-to-head games occurs, the Cowboys are in with one more win.  Let me break it down for you.  If the teams split and the Cowboys lose to Philly and beat Tampa Bay, for example, they would finish 9-7 and possess the same record as the Giants if they beat both the Redskins and Jets. Then, intricate tiebreakers would come into play.  As shown on <a href="http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures" target="_blank">NFL.com</a>, those are:
<ol>
	<li>Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference</li>
</ol>
The first tiebreaker would obviously end in a tie following a split.  If the Cowboys lose to either the Eagles and Bucs (and the Giants win against the 'Skins and Jets), the teams would finish 9-7 and both have a division record of 3-3, meaning the third tiebreaker would be a factor.  In common games (all but two, remember), the Giants and Cowboys would again be tied at 9-5 (including their head-to-head split).  Thus, the <em>fourth</em> tiebreaker is needed.  Here, the Cowboys have the advantage, as they will have a superior conference record following a split, no matter how the other games shake out.

Let's recap. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are in the playoffs.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Giants sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are almost assuredly in the playoffs.  They would miss out if they lose both remaining games and the Cowboys win both.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the teams split, the Cowboys are in if they win one of their other games.  If the Cowboys lose both of those games, the Giants are in if they win both of their remaining contests.</strong></li>
</ul>
For Dallas, all of the math equates to one simple conclusion: win this week, and you will almost certainly be NFC East champs.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Jason Garrett&#8217;s Late-Game Clock Management</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Jason Garrett deserves even more blame than he is receiving for his late-game clock management 


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/why-jason-garrett-was-wrong-to-run-late-vs-new-england/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why calling three straight runs in the fourth quarter against...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command'>Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command</a> <small>The title is self-explanatory. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/more-on-jason-garretts-decision-to-run-late-vs-pats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Responding to some reader comments on Jason Garrett's late-game play-calling...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it, I published a rather <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/">harsh criticism of Jason Garrett</a></strong> last night, explaining why his lack of courage is a hindrance to the Dallas Cowboys.  As long as Garrett is punting on 4th and 1 at the opponent's 35-yard line or displaying atrocious (if there was a word that was worse, I would us that) clock management skills, this team will cease to capitalize on their potential.

After time to contemplate the value of his decision to not call a timeout late in the fourth quarter of Sunday's loss, Garrett must surely see the error of his ways, right?  Nope.  <a href="http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/_/id/7317155/dallas-cowboys-jason-garrett-explains-late-game-clock-management-loss-arizona-cardinals" target="_blank">Said Garrett</a>:
<blockquote>We very well could have taken a timeout there. We felt like we were in field-goal range. We have yard lines that we use as guidelines before the game. We felt like we were in range at that point.  Tony had them on the line of scrimmage quickly, so we went ahead and clocked it and used that as a timeout. You see so many situations where you have negative plays in those situations. We felt like we were in (Dan Bailey's) range to give him a chance to kick the game-winner. . .We felt pretty good about where we were. Once you get to that 30-yard line we felt like that was a pretty good opportunity for us.</blockquote>
You cannot be serious, Jason.  There were 23 seconds left on the clock when the Cowboys obtained a first down at the Cardinals' 31-yard line, so Garrett's insinuation that the offense clocked the ball "quickly" is erroneous.  On top of that, spiking the ball "as a timeout" is the entire reason no one in their right mind can understand what was going through your own yesterday.

With two timeouts in hand, how in the world do you not use one with 23 seconds on the clock?  Even if you decide you do not want to try to advance the ball down the field, why not at least give yourself the option?  If you (mistakenly) want to settle for a 49-yard field goal attempt, why not run Romo to the middle of the field, let the clock run down, then attempt the field goal with your kicker in a better spot?

Of course, the no-brainer coaching decision is to immediately call timeout and work harder to get the ball downfield.  Instead, Garrett coached scared, disregarding the numbers in favor of not risking a big loss.  But what are "the numbers"?  Let's see. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>On average, a kicker has a <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/11/just-for-kicks.html" target="_blank">65% chance of converting</a> a 49-yard field goal try.
</strong></li>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys gained six more yards, those odds increase to 75%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys had passed the football, there chances of giving up a sack (based on season averages) were 4.0%.  In reality, they were lower because this wasn't a "normal" game situation and Romo would be more willing to throw the ball away at the first sign of trouble than on, say, a 1st and 10 in the first quarter.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>A loss of six yards would equate to a field goal try on which kickers have displayed around 50% accuracy. </strong></li>
</ul>
For Garrett's decision to let the clock tick down to be correct, we would have to assume the Cowboys' offense has less than a 6% chance of gaining six yards on a passing play.  Anyone think that is the case?  Me neither.

One of the major mistakes Garrett made was in his binary thinking regarding field goals.  Brian Burke of Advanced NFL Stats<a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/unicorns-tooth-fairy-cowboys-and-field.html" target="_blank"> pointed that out</a>, discussing Garrett's black-and-white ideas:
<blockquote>Also, note Garrett's conception of "field goal range." He has a yard line established before the game. That kind of thinking assumes a yes-or-no, black-and-white idea of a field goal attempt. Either you're in range or you're not. If we're in "range", and the kicker misses, well, that's his fault. This is a failure to think in probabilistic terms.</blockquote>
The sort of false dichotomy Garrett displayed with his thinking shows he either does not understand statistics at a fundamental level, or he understands them and coaches to limit the blame which could be placed upon him after defeat, instead exposing his players to it.  I think it is the latter.  Unfortunately for Dallas, cowards don't win Super Bowls.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tony Romo Directional Passing: Why Dallas Should Throw Deep More Often</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Grading the 'Boys"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the remainder of the season


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-defensive-linelinebackers/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Sean Lee has played better than Jay Ratliff, and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-times-final-2010-player-position-rankings/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Victor Butler and Martellus Bennett over Dez Bryant? Orlando Scandrick...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Believe it or not, the Dallas Cowboys are going to see a dramatic downgrade at guard with the loss of Montrae Holland to a torn biceps.  I have been critical of Holland in the past, providing him with a C+ grade in my <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/01/grading-the-boys-in-2010-part-vii-offensive-line/" target="_blank">2010 Offensive Line Grades</a></strong>.  Holland is not an incredible athlete and can appear slow-footed at times, often struggling with quick defensive tackles.  Nonetheless, he outplayed every Cowboys offensive linemen not named Tyron Smith in 2011.  Here is why. . .

Holland participated in 641 snaps this season, 361 of which were in pass protection.  He yielded eight pressures, one hit and two sacks in those snaps, good for a pressure rate of 2.21%.  While not at an elite level, that rate is still quite good.  As a comparison, right guard Kyle Kosier has a pressure rate of 2.85% this season.  That falls right in line with his pressure rate of 2.82% from 2010, providing a statistically significant sample size.  You can see the overall 2010 numbers below.

[caption id="attachment_8652" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="  "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-8652" title="2010 OL Pass Pro" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1-300x192.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="192" /></a>[/caption]

Many of you know I often praise Kosier's pass protection ability, and Holland has been superior to the veteran in 2011.  To get a broader sense of Holland's 2011 success, I took a look at the numbers of some of the top-graded guards (and middle tier guards) on <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>.

[caption id="attachment_9372" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9372" title="Guard Pressure Rates 2011" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011-300x158.png" alt="" width="300" height="158" /></a>[/caption]

You can see Holland's pressure rate, although not elite, was well above-average.  The #32 and #33 ranked guards at PFF surrendered pressure rates up to 46% higher than Holland's.  On top of that, I would grade Holland as the Cowboys' second-best run blocker all season if I was turning in my grades today.  I would provide him with a 'B' in both run blocking and pass protection, and that run blocking grade will undoubtedly be higher than all non-rookie offensive linemen in Big D.

Whether Derrick Dockery or Kevin Kowalski replaces Holland, the Cowboys will see a decline in production.  Holland was having a really strong 2011 campaign. . .and one which was being overlooked even by me.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys Times &#187; Film Study/Stat Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/film-studystats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com</link>
	<description>Unrivaled Dallas Cowboys Info 24/7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should the Cowboys Make a Run at G Carl Nicks?</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl Nicks will be the top free agent guard on the market this offseason.  Should Dallas jump on him?


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think'>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</a> <small>Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats'>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</a> <small>Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In the past week or so, I have written extensively on the Cowboys' offensive line.  In my last post (a look at some <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/">interesting offensive statistics</a></strong> from 2011), I hit you with these numbers:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn’t start in 2012, although he probably will.</strong></li>
</ul>
It is pretty clear the interior line is in disarray in Dallas, and something needs to be done to fix it.  I suggested <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-where-should-doug-free-play/">moving Doug Free to right guard</a></strong> and drafting a right tackle in the first round (with Tyron Smith obviously kicking to the left side).  There are some pros and cons to that plan, but I like it because it instantly upgrades two spots.

Others have suggested the Cowboys might make a run at impending <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4689477/could-cowboys-make-play-for-carl-nicks?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">free agent guard Carl Nicks</a>, though.  Although Jerry Jones has refrained from signing big-money free agents since Jason Garrett has taken over as head coach, this is one I actually believe the 'Boys should jump all over.  Here's why.

Nicks will command a hefty contract, but guards are continually underpaid in the NFL.  He won't garner nearly as much money as an elite left tackle, but his impact (for Dallas, especially) isn't that much less than his tackle counterpart.  We saw how much a weak interior line can affect an offense in 2011.  Don't let it happen again in 2012.

Nicks was the No. 2 ranked guard by <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>, yielding only eight pressures all season.  He had the second-highest pass blocking efficiency in the NFL, allowing a sack, hit or pressure on just 1.4% of pass plays.  Nicks is a dominant run blocker as well.  Saints running backs averaged a ridiculous 5.96 yards-per-carry when Nicks was at the point-of-attack this season.  Compare those numbers with the Cowboys' interior linemen (above).  Dallas backs averaged less than four yards per carry when running behind Holland in 2011, and he's a player whose run blocking I praised as solid.

Personally, I don't think the acquisition of Nicks means the team should automatically forget about switching Free's position.  A tackle-to-guard transition might not seem as appealing with Nicks in town, but an offensive line of Smith, Nicks, Kosier (who can play center), Free, and a rookie right tackle looks pretty damn good to me.  Throw in Holland and Phil Costa as backups, and you're all set.

Either way, Nicks is a player who the Cowboys should seriously consider.  He will demand a pretty penny, but guards are repeatedly undervalued.  He's a player on whom to break the bank this offseason.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/should-the-cowboys-make-a-run-at-g-carl-nicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys 2011 Recap: Interesting Offensive Stats</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stats which back up the ideas that Tony Romo is an elite quarterback, the Cowboys' running backs need to improve in pass pro, Montrae Holland played very well in 2011, and Phil Costa shouldn't start in 2012


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/how-dallas-cowboys-player-rankings-should-affect-2011-draft-prep/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Mefenamic Cap. ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Player and position rankings for the Dallas Cowboys in 2010,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-skill-position-grades-through-week-7/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7'>Dallas Cowboys Skill Position Grades Through Week 7</a> <small>Grades for Tony Romo, DeMarco Murray, Miles Austin and others...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

I am going to begin my 2012 Draft coverage early this year, and you can expect it to be superb. . .<strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/category/draft/">as per usual</a></strong>.  Between those articles you can also expect to find stat analysis of the Cowboys 2011 season.  Below, I have pasted some interesting numbers from both <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/signature.php?tab=signature&amp;pos=qbr" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a> and my own Excel spreadsheets.  Similar defensive statistics to come.

<strong style="color: #000080;">Tony Romo</strong>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo finished the season fourth in the NFL in passer rating at 102.5, behind only Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees and Tom Brady.  That includes a 104.4 rating in the fourth quarter. . .not bad for a "choke artist." </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Taking away drops, spikes and throw aways, Romo's completion percentage was 73.5%. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>On deep passes of 20+ yards, Romo completed 54.8% of his attempts.  That was second in the league to Aaron Rodgers, but only 11.9% of Romo's passes traveled that long--good for only 13th in the league.  He threw 13 touchdowns and only two picks on deep throws.  I've been saying for years the <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tony-romo-directional-passing-why-dallas-should-throw-deep-more-often/">Cowboys would benefit immensely from more deep passes</a>. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Romo was under pressure on 30.7% of dropbacks, which was 13th highest in league, but completed 56.7% of his passes in these situations.  That was second-best in the NFL to only Drew Brees<span style="color: #000080;">.</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Dez Bryant, Miles Austin and Laurent Robinson</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys quarterbacks had a 110.8 passer rating when throwing to Dez Bryant, which was the 16th-highest of any receiver in the NFL.  Romo threw three of his interceptions when targeting Bryant.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>I have seen some criticisms of Miles Austin lately, even from "expert" Dallas-area writers.  Don't listen to it.  Austin's only problem has been staying healthy, as Romo posted a 117.8 rating when throwing to Austin, including zero interceptions.  That rating is good for 11th among all receivers.  Austin is an elite wide receiver who will have a monster 2012 season if he stays on the field.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Puzzling to me are Austin's drops.  After a 2010 season in which he struggled with dropping passes, Austin let four more get through his hands this season.  That isn't an enormous amount, but it was 8.5% of catchable passes and good for just 37th in the NFL.  I think this is a small sample size at work, though, as just one less drop would shoot Austin up to 23rd.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Meanwhile, Bryant tallied only one drop all season--second-best in the NFL of any receiver who played 25% of his team's snaps.  Only Golden Tate caught every pass possible.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Laurent Robinson caught 58.8% of deep passes (20+ yards) thrown his way, good for third in NFL.  Austin was 10th at 50.0%, and Bryant 29th at 36.8%.  These numbers are misleading, as Robinson is very rarely the first read on plays.  If he is thrown to, chances are he's fairly open.  Bryant gets balls in double-coverage, and so we'd expect his deep catch rate to be lower.  Larry Fitzgerald, for example, was just 24th in the NFL at 41.2%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Robinson tallied 2.18 yards per route--the top number on the Cowboys.</strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>DeMarco Murray and Felix Jones were both solid at avoiding defenders in 2011, tallying 3.01 and 2.98 yards-after-contact/attempt.  Those rates were 10th and 11th in the league.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray had 36.8% of his yardage come on runs of 15+ yards, which was the 12th-highest rate in the NFL.  Jones was 31st at 26.4%.  Again, this stat can be misleading.  While you always want big plays, a really high "big run rate" can be an indicator that a running back will regress to the mean the following season, rushing for fewer big plays and seeing a decrease in both total yards and yards per attempt.  Murray and Jones are both breakaway players, and I'd expect both of them to be around 35% in any given season.  As an example of how much these numbers can fluctuate, consider that Jones saw 44.0% of his yards come on big plays in 2009, compared to just 15.3% last season.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones were 24th and 26th, respectively, in catch rate at 89.7% and 89.2%</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Murray and Jones both need to improve in pass protection.  Jones allowed a pressure, hit or sack on 6.3% of snaps he was in pass pro.  This was just the 41st-best mark in the NFL.  Murray's 9.7% number came in at 62nd in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Jason Witten dropped 3.61% of balls thrown his way (three total), good for 10th in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>13.5% of Witten's snaps came in the slot.  That was just the 17th-highest percentage for tight ends, and the rate was well behind the top 10 (all of whom played 25+% snaps in slot). </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten was 12th in yards per route at 1.69.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Witten blocked on only 9.4% of pass plays, well below his rate in past seasons.  He was 18th in the NFL with 3.9% of snaps resulting in a pressure, hit or sack.  Martellus Bennett was 17th, with 3.8% of his snaps resulting in some sort of pressure.  It confirms the notion that Witten and Bennett are similar in pass protection (although Bennett is far superior as a run blocker).  Bennett blocked on 20.1% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Offensive Line</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The entire offensive line was 14th overall in pass blocking efficiency, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on 18.5% of pass plays. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Tyron Smith was the league's 14th most efficient tackle in terms of pass protection, allowing a pressure, hit or sack on just 4.0% of pass plays.  Free was 48th with 6.3%.  He also allowed 10 sacks, which was sixth-worst in the NFL. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Montrae Holland checked in at 20th among all guards in terms of pass protection efficiency, allowing some sort of pressure on 2.5% of pass plays.  This confirms my thought that <a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/">Holland was very underrated this year</a>. Kyle Kosier was 33rd at 3.2%.  He was just a league-average guard in 2011.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Phil Costa was 29th in the NFL among centers with 2.7% pass protection efficiency.  He really shouldn't start in 2012, although he probably will. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Bill Nagy allowed pressure on 4.1% of pass plays, good for 41st in the league. </strong></li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/dallas-cowboys-2011-recap-interesting-offensive-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyzing the Top Tier Offensive Tackles in 2012 NFL Draft</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scouting reports on Matt Kalil, Jonathan Martin and Riley Reiff


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/04/dallas-cowboys-draft-usc-ot-tyron-smith-no-9-overall/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lexapro ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Initial reactions to the Cowboys selecting USC offensive tackle Tyron...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-potential-draft-pick-in-2011-anthony-castonzo-ot-boston-college/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Renova ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Scouting report on Boston College offensive tackle Anthony Castonzo, including...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Justin Shoemaker

<em>Editor's Note: A few days ago, we had an article published in the Dallas Observer which argued <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2012/01/cowboys-giants-recap.php" target="_blank">why Doug Free should be moved to guard</a></strong>.  In addition to his contract being a sunk cost and rookie right tackle Tyron Smith being ready to make the switch to the left side, there will also (likely) be a top tier offensive tackle available for Dallas with the 14th overall selection.  While the team needs all the help it can get on defense, selecting an OT in the first round would instantly upgrade two positions.  DCT contributor Justin Shoemaker took some time to analyze the top three offensive tackle prospects in the 2012 NFL Draft.</em>

<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Matt Kalil (USC)</strong></span>

- sole reason Tyron Smith played right tackle for USC

-incredible footwork and very nimble for a  6’7'' guy. . .has the size to dominate in the power running game but the quickness to get out on counters, tosses and screens

- very comparable to Joe Thomas and Jake Long. . .has tools to be All-Pro

- unless Dallas moves up, he will be out of reach (likely No. 2 overall)

- Note from Jonathan: When I began studying Tyron Smith last year, I just assumed he was a left tackle.  After a couple plays I realized the player I was reviewing was white, so I had a pretty good idea I wasn't watching Smith.  I kept watching, though, because that player (Kalil) was absolutely dominant.  I can say I wholeheartedly believe Kalil is the top offensive tackle prospect I have seen. . .ever.  He's superior to Thomas and Long, in my opinions, and he will be an All-Pro for a decade.

<strong><span style="color: #a93022;">Jonathan Martin (Stanford)</span></strong>

- has protected Andrew Luck, but may have looked better than reality due to Luck's quick release (in much the same way Peyton Manning has made his average line look elite)

- surprisingly better in run blocking than pass protection

- versatile enough to play RT or LT; can set the edge, but still has agility to get to second level

- can play aggressively and with an attitude at times, but then becomes defensive and gives up too much ground to the pass rusher.

- seems to struggle when matched up on nine-technique players or 3-4 outside linebackers; thrives against "power" seven or five-technique rushers

- still has plenty of room to improve technique; would be instant upgrade over Free, even at right tackle

<span style="color: #ffcc00;"><strong>Riley Reiff (Iowa)</strong></span>

-typical Big 10 lineman, which means everyone loves the run blocking ability. . .will have more knocks on his pass protection

-can get a little stiff and awkward in both run blocking and pass protection; not a natural athlete like Kalil or Martin

-great awareness of the pocket and pushing the defender beyond it; will let defenders rush themselves out of play

-could be beast in various run blocking schemes, but may not fit as well for the Cowboys if they plan to incorporate more "finesse" runs with Murray and Jones

- no quit attitude until the whistle blows, play contagious to teammates (he's a Marc Colombo with skill)

-very much like fellow Hawkeye Bryan Bulaga,

- probably not enough value at No. 14

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2012/01/analyzing-the-top-tier-offensive-tackles-in-2012-nfl-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 17: How Dallas Can Win the NFC East</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas in Week 17


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup'>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</a> <small>The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

In addition to my article for the Times on <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/how-dallas-should-attack-giants-pass-defense/" target="_blank">how Dallas can beat Cover 2 Man Under</a></strong> this weekend in the Meadowlands, I also did a piece for the <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">Dallas Observer</a></strong>.  Head over there to check out my <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas</a>. </strong>Along with more analysis of the coverage which irritated Dallas in Week 14, I add a full game plan for the 'Boys.  Here are some of the highlights:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Don't blitz often.  Eli Manning's passer rating against the blitz is very comparable to that when four or less defenders rush him, but the Cowboys do not have the talent in the secondary to deal with a blitz that fails.  The team should be in the business of playing aggressively while still allowing for a chance to win the game late, and yielding quick scores due to unsuccessful blitz attempts won't help.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The 'Boys should mimic the Giants' Week 14 game plan by playing a lot of Cover 2 Man Under.  By keeping everything in front of them, the defense can maximize their chances of halting Hakeem Nicks and Victor Cruz and force either a tight end or a running back to beat them.  Although Brandon Jacobs wore down Dallas in the teams' last meeting, Ahmad Bradshaw is the more likely of the two to give Dallas fits this week.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Giants pass a lot out of double-tight formations, so the Cowboys cannot sell out to defend the run when they see the look.  The G-Men used a double-tight set 34 times in Week 14, so the 'Boys better be ready for it.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The Cowboys, on the other hand, do tip their play calls via their formation, personnel package, or down-and-distance.  Jason Garrett could benefit from being a bit less predictable this week.  Garrett's predictability could be utilized to get the ball downfield with play action. But since 2009, Dallas quarterbacks have thrown for 20-plus yards on only 8.7 percent of play-action passes. And in two-plus years of passes, Garrett has called a play-action pass only eight times with 1-4 yards-to-go for a first down -- the situations when faking a run would actually work. Instead, he's called for a play-action look on 11 plays with 20-plus yards-to-go, when showing a running play is either an obvious decoy or hopeless.</strong></li>
</ul>
For additional analysis, <strong><a href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/12/how_the_cowboys_can_beat_the_g.php" target="_blank">head over to the Observer</a></strong> and leave your comments there.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-17-how-dallas-can-win-the-nfc-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Cowboys&#8217; Montrae Holland More Valuable Than You Think</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Grading the 'Boys"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Cowboys will miss guard Montrae Holland for the remainder of the season


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-offensive-line/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Invega ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Tyron Smith has been the best offensive lineman for...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/dallas-cowboys-quarter-season-grades-defensive-linelinebackers/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Liv.52 Capsules ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why Sean Lee has played better than Jay Ratliff, and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/dallas-cowboys-times-final-2010-player-position-rankings/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Trivastal ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Victor Butler and Martellus Bennett over Dez Bryant? Orlando Scandrick...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Believe it or not, the Dallas Cowboys are going to see a dramatic downgrade at guard with the loss of Montrae Holland to a torn biceps.  I have been critical of Holland in the past, providing him with a C+ grade in my <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/01/grading-the-boys-in-2010-part-vii-offensive-line/" target="_blank">2010 Offensive Line Grades</a></strong>.  Holland is not an incredible athlete and can appear slow-footed at times, often struggling with quick defensive tackles.  Nonetheless, he outplayed every Cowboys offensive linemen not named Tyron Smith in 2011.  Here is why. . .

Holland participated in 641 snaps this season, 361 of which were in pass protection.  He yielded eight pressures, one hit and two sacks in those snaps, good for a pressure rate of 2.21%.  While not at an elite level, that rate is still quite good.  As a comparison, right guard Kyle Kosier has a pressure rate of 2.85% this season.  That falls right in line with his pressure rate of 2.82% from 2010, providing a statistically significant sample size.  You can see the overall 2010 numbers below.

[caption id="attachment_8652" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="  "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-8652" title="2010 OL Pass Pro" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2010-OL-Pass-Pro1-300x192.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="192" /></a>[/caption]

Many of you know I often praise Kosier's pass protection ability, and Holland has been superior to the veteran in 2011.  To get a broader sense of Holland's 2011 success, I took a look at the numbers of some of the top-graded guards (and middle tier guards) on <a href="https://www.profootballfocus.com/data/by_position.php?tab=by_position&amp;season=2011&amp;pos=G&amp;stype=r&amp;runpass=&amp;teamid=-1&amp;numsnaps=25&amp;numgames=1" target="_blank">Pro Football Focus</a>.

[caption id="attachment_9372" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9372" title="Guard Pressure Rates 2011" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Guard-Pressure-Rates-2011-300x158.png" alt="" width="300" height="158" /></a>[/caption]

You can see Holland's pressure rate, although not elite, was well above-average.  The #32 and #33 ranked guards at PFF surrendered pressure rates up to 46% higher than Holland's.  On top of that, I would grade Holland as the Cowboys' second-best run blocker all season if I was turning in my grades today.  I would provide him with a 'B' in both run blocking and pass protection, and that run blocking grade will undoubtedly be higher than all non-rookie offensive linemen in Big D.

Whether Derrick Dockery or Kevin Kowalski replaces Holland, the Cowboys will see a decline in production.  Holland was having a really strong 2011 campaign. . .and one which was being overlooked even by me.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-cowboys-montrae-holland-more-valuable-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking Cowboys&#8217; Improvements Over Last Decade</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using EPA to track the historic performance of the Dallas Cowboys


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/rob-ryans-defensive-fronts-the-46-psycho-and-cloud/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing Rob Ryan's defensive fronts, including the "46," "Psycho," and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/03/rob-ryans-zone-blitzes-how-teams-attack-fire-zones-and-how-dallas-can-respond/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>The title says it all....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/11/predictability-remains-in-jason-garretts-play-calling/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling'>Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling</a> <small>Analyzing predictability within Jason Garrett's play-calling and how the Cowboys...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Over at <strong><a href="http://wp.advancednflstats.com/yearstatvisualization.php" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a></strong>, a new feature has taken the world (my world) by storm.  If you click on the link, you can see the offensive and defensive "Expected Points Added" (a metric used to grade each play of a football game--a touchdown obviously has an EPA of six, while a 1st and Goal at the one-yard line is very close that number).  By tracking EPA, you can determine which teams are playing well, even if it is not reflected in their record, and which have simply been lucky.  For us here at DCT, we can take a look at the improvements of the Cowboys over the past decade.  Click on the link above to check out the graphs, or just scroll below.

[caption id="attachment_9304" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9304" title="DAL EPA per game" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-300x216.png" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a>[/caption]

In the first graph, you can see the Cowboys' historic offensive performance as compared to their defensive efficiency.  A few notes:
<ul>
	<li><strong>Since Jason Garrett has taken over as the offensive coordinator, the Cowboys have had well above-average offensive efficiency in every year except for 2008. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Their best season over the last decade, as you might guess, was in 2007.  This season has fallen right in line with 2006 and 2009. </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Somewhat surprisingly, the best defenses in Dallas were in the first part of the 2000s.  Since Garrett has been in town, the Cowboys have been below-average on defense, in terms of EPA, every year.</strong></li>
</ul>
[caption id="attachment_9305" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9305" title="DAL EPA per game offense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-offense-300x105.png" alt="" width="300" height="105" /></a>[/caption]

Above, you can track the Cowboys' offensive improvements over the last 10+ years.  The most important aspect of this graph, in my view, is the fact that offensive performance is leveling out under Garrett.  Yes, the offense has been really solid during Garrett's tenure, but we see the team was moving in that direction since 2002.  There are two ways to look at this. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>The first is that Garrett is overrated as an offensive coordinator because the offense improved for multiple years since 2002 and their play has been stagnant since Garrett took over.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>The other way to view the graph is that the Cowboys were bound to improve since their horrible 2002 campaign, and Garrett's ability to keep the offense around the 5.0 EPA/G mark is a testament to his ability. </strong></li>
</ul>
I think we are seeing more of the second explanation than the first.  If the Cowboys were consistently ranked No. 1 in offense each year, we wouldn't say Garrett has shown an inability to improve as a coordinator.  When teams are playing at either a very high or very low level, we are sure to see their play regress to the mean.  This is one reason why it should be a coach's dream to take over a 1-15 team.  Even if the coach does absolutely nothing right, the team will likely win more games the following season, and the coach will be viewed as "improving" his squad.  The fact that the offensive EPA has "leveled out" with Garrett here is a good thing.

Onto the defense. . .

[caption id="attachment_9306" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9306" title="DAL EPA per game defense" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DAL-EPA-per-game-defense-300x100.png" alt="" width="300" height="100" /></a>[/caption]

This is where the Cowboys need to improve to become a Championship-caliber football team.  Still, the "decline" in defensive production since the early part of the decade is not as drastic as it seems.  The Cowboys have become a far better offensive football team over the last five years because they have been able to throw the ball well.  In the early part of the 2000s, that wasn't the case.  The team opted to shorten games under head coach Bill Parcells, and that resulted in a superior EPA/G as compared to the current defense.

It is not the job of a coach to maximize offensive or defensive EPA, however, but rather to create the largest gap between their team and the opposition.  EPA is not an efficiency stat as we are using it here, so the "superior" EPA/G displayed by the early-2000s Cowboys does not <em>necessarily </em>represent a better defensive football team.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assessing Pivotal Plays in Cowboys-Giants Week 14 Matchup</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Times Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Film Obervations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 10 most important plays in the Cowboys' Week 14 loss to the Giants


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes'>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</a> <small>Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/assessing-football-strategy-is-running-the-football-often-necessary/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Female Cialis ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing the merits of short kickoffs, rushing the ball often,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/another-epic-collapse-thoughts-on-cowboys-week-14-loss-to-giants/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants'>Another Epic Collapse: Thoughts on Cowboys&#8217; Week 14 Loss to Giants</a> <small>Why the Cowboys should have let the Giants score late,...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

One of my favorite things to do when I watch the Cowboys' games at home is track the team's win probability throughout the night using <a href="http://live.advancednflstats.com/index.php?gameid1=2011121113" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>' win probability charts.  Using a model which takes the down-and-distance, score, and time into account, ANS is able to determine the probability of a team winning a game at any point in time.  This information doesn't stem from estimates, but rather years of NFL data.

It is always fascinating to see how certain plays can influence a team's chances of winning.  Punts, for example, often result in a fairly significant drop in win probability because giving away possession is generally detrimental to a team.  Near the beginning of games, it takes a huge play to swing win probability in a major way.  A 4th and Goal defensive stop while up six points with 45 minutes to play might result in a big bump in win probability, but that same play would be much larger--perhaps from around 50% to 100%--if the play was the final one of the game.

Using the graph from Sunday night's game, I thought it would be fun to take a look at which plays affected the Cowboys' win probability most significantly.  Below, you can see the chart, along with 10 plays (or short sequences) which I have labeled as the most important. . .

[caption id="attachment_9270" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="CLICK TO ENLARGE "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9270 " title="Cowboys Giants Week 14 Win Probability" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cowboys-Giants-Week-14-Win-Probability-300x191.png" alt="" width="300" height="191" /></a>[/caption]

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 1: 64-yard pass to Hakeem Nicks on 3rd and 7 at NYG 32; 53:44 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP (win probability) drops from 42 to 25 (-17%)</strong></li>
</ul>
A 17% drop in win probability in the middle of the first quarter is a big one.  This wouldn't have been much higher even if Nicks scored.  Poor coverage by Alan Ball.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 2: 26-yard gain by Felix Jones on 1st and 10 at NYG 42; 48:19 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 42 to 52 (+10%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The touchdown pass to John Phillips put Dallas on top, but Jones and a subsequent defensive holding penalty put the 'Boys in position to score.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 3: Felix Jones fumbles on 1st and 10 and ball recovered by NYG at DAL 14; 31:38 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 57 to 38 (-19%)</strong></li>
</ul>
This had the potential to be devastating to Dallas but they made the best of the situation by holding New York to a field goal and kicking one of their own before halftime.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 4: 47-yard touchdown pass to Mario Manningham on 3rd and 5 at DAL 47; 19:39 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 70 to 45 (-25%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Yielding a 47-yard score on a crucial 3rd down due to a broken coverage is heartbreaking.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 5: 74-yard pass to Laurent Robinson on 3rd and 10 at DAL 20; 13:17 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 38 to 66 (+28%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Other than the blocked field goal to end the game, this pass to Robinson was the most important one of the contest for Dallas.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 6: 15-yard completion to Mario Manningham on 4th and 3 at DAL 37; 8:24 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 78 to 56 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Here, you can see how game situation affects win probability.  The pass was only 15 yards long, but it came on a crucial 4th and 3 with just over eight minutes left to play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 7: Sean Lee interception on 3rd and 9 at DAL 21; 6:50 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP jumps from 62 to 89 (+27%)</strong></li>
</ul>
I actually thought this would be more valuable to Dallas, but the fact that it came on a difficult 3rd and 9 (when New York's chances of converting were low) likely affected the jump in WP.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 8: Cowboys' three-and-out; 2:20 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 88 to 67 (-21%)</strong></li>
</ul>
Romo's infamous incompletion to Austin hurt Dallas in a big way.  If you assume Romo hits that pass 90% of the time and Dallas' wins 99% of games following a completion, the actual dip in WP would be closer to -31%.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 9: Holding on Abram Elam and 18-yard completion to Jake Ballard on 1st and 10 at DAL 19; 1:21 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 49 to 27 (-22%)</strong></li>
</ul>
The holding penalty on Elam has been overlooked.  DeMarcus Ware's offside penalty was also costly, but the full extent of it isn't factored into the WP chart because the errant snap and loss by the Giants isn't reflected in the play-by-play.

<span style="color: #333399;"><strong>Play 10: Blocked FG; 0:06 to play</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li><strong>Cowboys' WP drops from 44 to &lt;1 (-43%)</strong></li>
</ul>
And the Cowboys' playoff chances drop from potentially around 90% with a win to now around 40% .

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/assessing-pivotal-plays-in-cowboys-giants-week-14-matchup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Cowboys vs. New York Giants, Week 14: How a Loss Affects Each Team&#8217;s Playoff Hopes</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gameday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Watch (Game Preview)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Statistical analysis of the Cowboys' playoff hopes


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-review-romo-at-fault/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Diltiazem Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Thoughts on the Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with the New...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/09/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-jets-week-1-what-to-watch-for-dallas-on-911/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Lasix (Brand) ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>1700 words on the Dallas Cowboys' Week 1 matchup with...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/cowboys-must-capitalize-on-takeaways/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Accutane ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why the Cowboys must capitalize when they force turnovers, and...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it (everyone, I'm assuming), I had an article published on The New York Times' football blog <em>The Fifth Down </em>titled <strong><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/keys-to-defeating-dallas-from-a-cowboys-writer/" target="_blank">Keys to Defeating Dallas, From a Cowboys Writer</a></strong>.  You can (and should) click on the link to read it.

Before I receive the inevitable backlash for writing such blasphemous content, let me point out that this article is not much different than my traditional "DOs and DON'Ts for Dallas" weekly post.  Instead of explaining what Dallas needs to do for a win, however, I simply flipped the script.  "Protect Doug Free" would have been sound advice for Dallas this week, and you will find a corresponding "Attack Doug Free" bullet point in my New York Times piece.

You can find all of my thoughts on the Week 14 matchup in that post.  Here, I wanted to take a look at the broader picture, assessing both the Cowboys' and Giants' odds of making the playoffs after the contest.  There are a number of ways to do that.  In this article, I will conduct a schedule analysis, estimating the odds of each team winning their remaining games and determining how that relates to the subsequent importance of this particular matchup for each squad.

In the beginning of the season, the importance of the strength of a team's schedule is very overblown, and for a variety of reasons.  First, when comparing the schedules of two division opponents, the 14 games which are not head-to-head contain just two dissimilarities, i.e. the Giants and Cowboys had just two opponents which differed.  Secondly, the constant talent flux in the NFL makes preseason predictions in regards to a team's strength of schedule almost useless.  Who wold have thought the Raiders, Bengals, Bills, Lions, etc. would not be "easy wins" in 2011?  Lastly, the overall strength of a schedule tends to even out over the course of a 16-game season.  Simply put, preseason strength of schedule sucks as a method by which to analyze a team's playoff hopes.

By Week 14, however, a team's remaining schedule has a huge influence in their odds of making the playoffs.  Over the course of four games, it is certainly possible to have three or four strong/weak opponents, meaning the schedule doesn't necessarily have time to "even out."  Plus, we already know the relative strength of each NFL team, so estimating each team's win probability for a single game is far easier.

With all of that said, let's take a look at the Giants' and Cowboys' remaining schedules, along with the probability they win each game. . .

[caption id="attachment_9257" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption=" "]<a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9257" title="Dallas Cowboys New York Giants 2011 WP" src="http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Dallas-Cowboys-New-York-Giants-2011-WP-300x164.png" alt="" width="300" height="164" /></a>[/caption]

While the probabilities I used are "just" estimates, they are well-researched, solid estimates using advanced statistics gathered from <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/team-rankings-week-fourteen.html" target="_blank">Advanced NFL Stats</a>.  Using their Generic Win Probability (the odds a team will win a game against a league-average opponent at a neutral site), we can estimate the chances of Dallas and New York winning each remaining game by combining the teams' GWP and factoring in home field advantage.  Thus, while I am "guessing" the odds of wins for the teams in their remaining contests, those probabilities are likely not too far from reality.

If we give each team a win total that directly correlates with their probabilities, i.e. the Cowboys' 54% chance of winning this week's matchup equates to ".54 wins," you can see the Cowboys' theoretical win total for the rest of the 2011 season is 2.37, while the Giants' is 2.40.  That difference is obviously not statistically significant, meaning the small errors which are undoubtedly contained within my win probability projections are surely enough to "make up for" this difference.

In other words, the Cowboys and Giants can be expected to win the same number of games moving forward.  Note that this conclusion does not mean the teams <em>will</em> win the same number of games, but rather that their chances of doing so are the most likely of all possible outcomes.

So what does this all mean for their playoff chances?  The incredible similarity between the teams and their win probability moving forward means that each's respective chances of making the playoffs, even after we factor in the schedule, are roughly the same as if they were both of league-average quality.

Think of it this way: if a team of the same quality of the Colts was 7-5 (like Dallas) and one with a talent level comparable to that of Green Bay was 6-6 (like New York), we'd still expect Green Bay's odds of making the playoffs to be greater due to their far higher win probability in each game.  The role of chance in that situation is less powerful than in the case of the 'Boys and G-Men.

In the latter comparison, we have two teams whose win probabilities for the remainder of the season are roughly equal.  This means that the chances of the Giants making the playoffs, taking their one-game deficit into account, are roughly the same as if we flipped a coin to determine the outcome of each contest.  Perform 10,000 coin flip simulations to allow the numbers to regress to the mean, and you will be left with each team's playoff chances.

Luckily, we have computers which can simulate seasons, so we don't need to waste time flipping a coin.  Over at <a href="http://files.nfl-forecast.com/archives/120" target="_blank">NFL-Forecast.com</a>, they have determined each team's chances of making the playoffs based on thousands of simulations with the GWP provided by Advanced NFL Stats.  If you head over there, you will see the odds of Dallas winning the NFC East are around 64%, with their overall playoff chances adding up to nearly 69% (meaning there is little chance they earn a Wild Card spot).  The Giants' odds are 35% to win the division and 36% to make the playoffs.

In terms of particular scenarios, the Cowboys will win the division if they beat the Giants in both of the clubs' remaining games.  If the Giants perform the same task, they will win the division as long as they do not lose both of their other two games <em>or</em> the Cowboys do not win both of their other games.  Simply put, if one squad wins both head-to-head games, they are effectively the NFC East champs.

If the more probable splitting of head-to-head games occurs, the Cowboys are in with one more win.  Let me break it down for you.  If the teams split and the Cowboys lose to Philly and beat Tampa Bay, for example, they would finish 9-7 and possess the same record as the Giants if they beat both the Redskins and Jets. Then, intricate tiebreakers would come into play.  As shown on <a href="http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures" target="_blank">NFL.com</a>, those are:
<ol>
	<li>Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.</li>
	<li>Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference</li>
</ol>
The first tiebreaker would obviously end in a tie following a split.  If the Cowboys lose to either the Eagles and Bucs (and the Giants win against the 'Skins and Jets), the teams would finish 9-7 and both have a division record of 3-3, meaning the third tiebreaker would be a factor.  In common games (all but two, remember), the Giants and Cowboys would again be tied at 9-5 (including their head-to-head split).  Thus, the <em>fourth</em> tiebreaker is needed.  Here, the Cowboys have the advantage, as they will have a superior conference record following a split, no matter how the other games shake out.

Let's recap. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are in the playoffs.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Giants sweep the head-to-head matchups, they are almost assuredly in the playoffs.  They would miss out if they lose both remaining games and the Cowboys win both.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the teams split, the Cowboys are in if they win one of their other games.  If the Cowboys lose both of those games, the Giants are in if they win both of their remaining contests.</strong></li>
</ul>
For Dallas, all of the math equates to one simple conclusion: win this week, and you will almost certainly be NFC East champs.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/dallas-cowboys-vs-new-york-giants-week-14-how-a-loss-affects-each-teams-playoff-hopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Jason Garrett&#8217;s Late-Game Clock Management</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Jason Garrett deserves even more blame than he is receiving for his late-game clock management 


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/why-jason-garrett-was-wrong-to-run-late-vs-new-england/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Isoniazid ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Why calling three straight runs in the fourth quarter against...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command'>Why Jason Garrett&#8217;s Ineptitude and Inability to Evolve as Head Coach Show Cowboys Will Never Win Championship Under His Command</a> <small>The title is self-explanatory. ...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/10/more-on-jason-garretts-decision-to-run-late-vs-pats/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Coreg ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Responding to some reader comments on Jason Garrett's late-game play-calling...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

For those who missed it, I published a rather <strong><a href="http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/why-jason-garretts-ineptitude-and-inability-to-evolve-as-head-coach-show-cowboys-will-never-win-championship-under-his-command/">harsh criticism of Jason Garrett</a></strong> last night, explaining why his lack of courage is a hindrance to the Dallas Cowboys.  As long as Garrett is punting on 4th and 1 at the opponent's 35-yard line or displaying atrocious (if there was a word that was worse, I would us that) clock management skills, this team will cease to capitalize on their potential.

After time to contemplate the value of his decision to not call a timeout late in the fourth quarter of Sunday's loss, Garrett must surely see the error of his ways, right?  Nope.  <a href="http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/_/id/7317155/dallas-cowboys-jason-garrett-explains-late-game-clock-management-loss-arizona-cardinals" target="_blank">Said Garrett</a>:
<blockquote>We very well could have taken a timeout there. We felt like we were in field-goal range. We have yard lines that we use as guidelines before the game. We felt like we were in range at that point.  Tony had them on the line of scrimmage quickly, so we went ahead and clocked it and used that as a timeout. You see so many situations where you have negative plays in those situations. We felt like we were in (Dan Bailey's) range to give him a chance to kick the game-winner. . .We felt pretty good about where we were. Once you get to that 30-yard line we felt like that was a pretty good opportunity for us.</blockquote>
You cannot be serious, Jason.  There were 23 seconds left on the clock when the Cowboys obtained a first down at the Cardinals' 31-yard line, so Garrett's insinuation that the offense clocked the ball "quickly" is erroneous.  On top of that, spiking the ball "as a timeout" is the entire reason no one in their right mind can understand what was going through your own yesterday.

With two timeouts in hand, how in the world do you not use one with 23 seconds on the clock?  Even if you decide you do not want to try to advance the ball down the field, why not at least give yourself the option?  If you (mistakenly) want to settle for a 49-yard field goal attempt, why not run Romo to the middle of the field, let the clock run down, then attempt the field goal with your kicker in a better spot?

Of course, the no-brainer coaching decision is to immediately call timeout and work harder to get the ball downfield.  Instead, Garrett coached scared, disregarding the numbers in favor of not risking a big loss.  But what are "the numbers"?  Let's see. . .
<ul>
	<li><strong>On average, a kicker has a <a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/11/just-for-kicks.html" target="_blank">65% chance of converting</a> a 49-yard field goal try.
</strong></li>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys gained six more yards, those odds increase to 75%.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>If the Cowboys had passed the football, there chances of giving up a sack (based on season averages) were 4.0%.  In reality, they were lower because this wasn't a "normal" game situation and Romo would be more willing to throw the ball away at the first sign of trouble than on, say, a 1st and 10 in the first quarter.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li><strong>A loss of six yards would equate to a field goal try on which kickers have displayed around 50% accuracy. </strong></li>
</ul>
For Garrett's decision to let the clock tick down to be correct, we would have to assume the Cowboys' offense has less than a 6% chance of gaining six yards on a passing play.  Anyone think that is the case?  Me neither.

One of the major mistakes Garrett made was in his binary thinking regarding field goals.  Brian Burke of Advanced NFL Stats<a href="http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/12/unicorns-tooth-fairy-cowboys-and-field.html" target="_blank"> pointed that out</a>, discussing Garrett's black-and-white ideas:
<blockquote>Also, note Garrett's conception of "field goal range." He has a yard line established before the game. That kind of thinking assumes a yes-or-no, black-and-white idea of a field goal attempt. Either you're in range or you're not. If we're in "range", and the kicker misses, well, that's his fault. This is a failure to think in probabilistic terms.</blockquote>
The sort of false dichotomy Garrett displayed with his thinking shows he either does not understand statistics at a fundamental level, or he understands them and coaches to limit the blame which could be placed upon him after defeat, instead exposing his players to it.  I think it is the latter.  Unfortunately for Dallas, cowards don't win Super Bowls.

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dallas-Cowboys-Times/117780151566006" target="_blank"><strong>Like Dallas Cowboys Times on Facebook</strong></a>

<strong><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheCowboysTimes" target="_blank">Follow Dallas Cowboys Times on Twitter</a></strong>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/more-on-jason-garretts-late-game-clock-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tony Romo Directional Passing: Why Dallas Should Throw Deep More Often</title>
		<link>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/12/tracking-cowboys-improvements-over-last-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Film/Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Study/Stat Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dallascowboystimes.com/?p=9303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using EPA to track the historic performance of the Dallas Cowboys


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/rob-ryans-defensive-fronts-the-46-psycho-and-cloud/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Bayer ASA Aspirin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>Analyzing Rob Ryan's defensive fronts, including the "46," "Psycho," and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/03/rob-ryans-zone-blitzes-how-teams-attack-fire-zones-and-how-dallas-can-respond/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION'>BUY Celecoxib ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</a> <small>The title says it all....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/11/predictability-remains-in-jason-garretts-play-calling/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling'>Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett&#8217;s Play-Calling</a> <small>Analyzing predictability within Jason Garrett's play-calling and how the Cowboys...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jonathan Bales

Over at <strong><a href="http://wp.advancednflstats.c
